Today's Top Space Headline: "Alien Civilizations May Not Be Technologically Advanced"
The Unknown Signal from a Star System 200 Light Years Away --Stephen Hawking: "A Serious Scientific Problem" (Today's Most Popular)

The Red Queen Phenomenon --"No One Species has an Advantage on a Planet Where 99% Have Gone Extinct"



"The fact that all organisms are nearly equally fit has profound implications for the evolution and persistence of life on Earth," says James H. Brown, a physiological ecologist at the University of New Mexico.

In a new study, a trio of scientists from universities in the United States and the United Kingdom describe the dynamic that began with the origin of life on Earth 4 billion years ago. They report that regardless of vastly different body size, location and life history, most plant, animal and microbial species are equally "fit" in the struggle for existence. This is because each transmits approximately the same amount of energy over its lifetime to produce the next generation of its species.


"There is no single way of living and using energy that is best," said the researchers. "Given the array of environmental conditions on the planet, one kind of organism might gain a temporary advantage, but such gains will soon be countered by other, competing organisms. The result is what evolutionary biologist Leigh Van Valen called the 'Red Queen phenomenon,' an evolutionary hypothesis based on Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass: All species must keep running to keep up with others and stay in the evolutionary race." The hypothesis explains the constant extinction rates observed in the Earth's paleontological record caused by co-evolution between competing species.

There are more than 8 million species of living things on Earth, but none of them -- from 100-foot blue whales to microscopic bacteria -- has an advantage over the others in the universal struggle for existence. The bottom line is that all organisms are, on average, equally fit for survival.


"This means that each elephant or blue whale contributes no more energy per gram of parent to the next generation than a trout or even a bacterium," said co-author Charles A.S. Hall, a systems ecologist with the College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF) in Syracuse, New York. "We found, rather astonishingly, by examining the production rate and the generation time of thousands of plants, animals and microbes that each would pass on, on average, the same amount of energy to the next generation per gram of parent, regardless of size.

A single-celled aquatic alga recreates its own body mass in one day, but lives for only a day. A large female elephant takes years to produce her first baby, and lives much longer than the alga. For all plants and animals of all sizes these two factors - rate of biomass production and generation time - exactly balance each other, so each contributes the same energy per gram of parent to the next generation in their lifetime."

The third author on the paper, which was published online, is mathematical biologist Richard M. Sibly of the University of Reading in the United Kingdom.

The scientists tackled an intriguing question about life on the planet, beginning with some common knowledge. On one hand, they noted, microscopic, unicellular bacteria, algae and protists that weigh only a few micrograms live fast, generate much new biomass per day or even per minute, and die young, often within hours. On the other hand, mammals such as a 100-foot blue whale can live up to 100 years but generate new biomass, including babies, much more slowly.

The authors ask a sweeping question: How can such enormous variation in reproduction and survival allow persistence and coexistence of so many species? Their answer: Because there is a universal tradeoff in how organisms acquire, transform and expend energy for survival and production within constraints imposed by physics and biology.

In their research, the authors built a model of energy allocation, based on data involving rates of energy investment in growth and reproduction, generation times (commonly considered 22 to 32 years for humans) and body sizes of hundreds of species ranging from microbes to mammals and trees. They found an exactly equal but opposite relationship between growth rate and generation time among all these organisms.

The net result is what the authors call the "equal fitness paradigm." Species are nearly equally fit for survival because they all devote the same quantity of energy per unit of body weight to produce offspring in the next generation; the higher activity and shorter life of small organisms is exactly compensated for by the slower activity and greater longevity of large organisms.

Hall said the tradeoff between rate of living and generation time is one reason for the great diversity of life on Earth: No one size or life form has a built-in advantage over another. The apparent benefits of being larger (for example, bigger males are more likely to win in competition for mates) are compensated for by the fact that larger animals are typically less productive over time.

The Daily Galaxy via SUNY College of Environmental Science

Click Here to View Recent Most Popular Space & Science Headlines



A brilliant concept. The baseline might be the amount of solar energy reaching the surface, which has changed over time. There's no reference to secular change here however. Yet.

Given the severity of the various mass extinction events - the Permian Extinction 250 million years ago, the K-T extinction 66 million years ago and other, earlier ones that may be less well documented; I think it's more a matter of luck that any species survives for any extended period of time. H. Sapiens is still a relative newcomer on the scene; ask me again in a million years how well suited we are.

If humans have any advantage, it's that we are adaptable and flexible. We dress for the weather; we modify our environment with buildings to keep the heat in or out, as appropriate. If we can continue to do so and to expand beyond this one fragile planet, we might outlive the dinosaurs - and THEY were around for 100 million years!

Humans are the aliens on Earth. It was designed for dinosaur's; who would
live in harmony with the planet, not destroy it like humans are doing.

Humans were a freak accident by an exploding asteroid; wiping out the
indigenousness dino's roaming the world. Humans are freaks of nature.

Some one; should have killed that chimp, for walking upright!

Did the original study include tardigrades? I would be interested in knowing what their biomass production / generation time is.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)