"Oldest Evidence for Life on Earth" --Life Form from First Two-Billion Years Discovered In the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area
Surprising Discovery --"Elements in the Massive Perseus Galaxy Cluster Nearly Identical to the Sun"

"Earth is Our Only Home, There's No Planet B" --World Scientists’ Issue a Second Urgent Warning

Main_1200 (1)

Some 15,000 scientists from 184 countries worldwide have signed a letter warning that Earth’s environment is on the road to destruction. The “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: Second Notice,” calls for action to avert irreversible damage to the planet.

The number of signatories may be the largest for any published scientific paper ever, said co-author Thomas Newsome, a research fellow at Deakin University and The University of Sydney.



The Letter --"World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice

[Selected excerpts from the letter below. Click above to read in it's entirety]

"To prevent widespread misery and catastrophic biodiversity loss, humanity must practice a more environmentally sustainable alternative to business as usual. This prescription was well articulated by the world’s leading scientists 25 years ago, but in most respects, we have not heeded their warning. Soon it will be too late to shift course away from our failing trajectory, and time is running out. We must recognize, in our day-to-day lives and in our governing institutions, that Earth with all its life is our only home."

Twenty-five years ago, the Union of Concerned Scientists and more than 1500 independent scientists, including the majority of living Nobel laureates in the sciences, penned the 1992 “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity."

These concerned professionals called on humankind to curtail environmental destruction and cautioned that “agreat change in our stewardship of the Earth and the life on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided.”

In their manifesto, they showed that humans were on a collision course with the natural world. They expressed concern about current, impending, or potential damage on planet Earth involving ozone depletion, freshwater availability, marine fishery collapses, ocean dead zones, forest loss, biodiversity destruction, climate change, and continued human population growth. They proclaimed that fundamental changes were urgently needed to avoid the consequences our present course would bring.

The authors of the 1992 declaration feared that humanity was pushing Earth’s ecosystems beyond their capacities to support the web of life. They described how we are fast approaching many of the limits of what the planet can tolerate without substantial and irreversible harm.

The scientists pleaded that we stabilize the human population, describing how our large numbers— swelled by another 2 billion people since 1992, a 35 percent increase—exert stresses on Earth that can overwhelm other efforts to realize a sustainable future. They implored that we cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and phase out fossil fuels, reduce deforestation, and reverse the trend of collapsing biodiversity.

On the 25th anniversary of their call, we look back at their warning and evaluate the human response by exploring available time-series data. Since 1992, with the exception of stabilizing the stratospheric ozone layer, humanity has failed to make sufficient progress in generally solving these foreseen environmental challenges, and alarmingly, most of them are getting far worse.


Image above, credit: climaterealityproject

Image top of page: The Earth straddling the limb of the moon, as seen from above Compton crater by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter on October 12, 2015. The large tan area in the upper right is the Sahara desert, and just beyond is Saudi Arabia. The Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America are visible to the left. 

Click Here to View Recent Most Popular Space & Science Posts


So, what do we have left? Maybe 200 years? So be it. Medical science has tripled our life span in the last 500 years and it will probably go up some more in the next 50 years. Our planet is being killed by the effects of over population.

@Dusty Rhodes Feels more like 75-100.

It's a shame we humans can wreak a planet in such a short time. Even if there were a planet B, it would face the same fate.

I estimate 2 more generations (if nuclear war, asteroid, virus don't come earlier) for humanity to go extinct.

Detailed research compile the facts, but facts and trends are often beyond the comprehension of most of humanity. Imagery is a bit easier to digest for most people. One such image is that of humanity being a biological fire, consuming the fossil fuel on the planet. Like a natural fire in a forest, the fire stops when the fuel is gone. That fire can not reoccur at that level until nature re-accumulates more fossil fuel, which will not occur with the coals of the human fire still slightly aglow.

Humanity will either create large-supply renewable energy technology, or collapse in a gradual decline to a much smaller population of subsistence agrarians with a much more challenging environment.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)