Apollo 14 Mission Rocks Reveal Real Age of Moon --"Much Earlier Than Thought" (VIDEO)
"Physics is a Message from the Future" --It Tells Us Who We Are (Today's "Galaxy" Stream)

“Life on Earth May Have Started Almost Instantaneously" --Compelling Evidence Discovered (Video)




“Twenty years ago, this would have been heretical; finding evidence of life 3.8 billion years ago was shocking,” said Mark Harrison, co-author of the research and a professor of geochemistry at UCLA. “Life on Earth may have started almost instantaneously,” added co-author Harrison, a member of the National Academy of Sciences. “With the right ingredients, life seems to form very quickly.”

The research suggests life in the universe could be abundant, Harrison said. On Earth, simple life appears to have formed quickly, but it likely took many millions of years for very simple life to evolve the ability to photosynthesize.

“The early Earth certainly wasn’t a hellish, dry, boiling planet; we see absolutely no evidence for that,” said Harrison. “The planet was probably much more like it is today than previously thought.”

UCLA geochemists have found evidence that life likely existed on Earth at least 4.1 billion years ago — 300 million years earlier than previous research suggested. The discovery indicates that life may have begun shortly after the planet formed 4.54 billion years ago.

The new research suggests that life existed prior to the massive bombardment of the inner solar system that formed the moon’s large craters 3.9 billion years ago.

“If all life on Earth died during this bombardment, which some scientists have argued, then life must have restarted quickly,” said Patrick Boehnke, a co-author of the research and a graduate student in Harrison’s laboratory.




Scientists had long believed the Earth was dry and desolate during that time period. Harrison’s research — including a 2008 study in Nature he co-authored with Craig Manning, a professor of geology and geochemistry at UCLA, and former UCLA graduate student Michelle Hopkins — is proving otherwise.

The researchers, led by Elizabeth Bell — a postdoctoral scholar in Harrison’s laboratory — studied more than 10,000 zircons originally formed from molten rocks, or magmas, from Western Australia. Zircons are heavy, durable minerals related to the synthetic cubic zirconium used for imitation diamonds. They capture and preserve their immediate environment, meaning they can serve as time capsules.

The scientists identified 656 zircons containing dark specks that could be revealing and closely analyzed 79 of them with Raman spectroscopy, a technique that shows the molecular and chemical structure of ancient microorganisms in three dimensions.

Bell and Boehnke, who have pioneered chemical and mineralogical tests to determine the condition of ancient zircons, were searching for carbon, the key component for life.

One of the 79 zircons contained graphite — pure carbon — in two locations.

“The first time that the graphite ever got exposed in the last 4.1 billion years is when Beth Ann and Patrick made the measurements this year,” Harrison said.

How confident are they that their zircon represents 4.1 billion-year-old graphite?

“Very confident,” Harrison said. “There is no better case of a primary inclusion in a mineral ever documented, and nobody has offered a plausible alternative explanation for graphite of non-biological origin into a zircon.”

The graphite is older than the zircon containing it, the researchers said. They know the zircon is 4.1 billion years old, based on its ratio of uranium to lead; they don’t know how much older the graphite is.

The carbon contained in the zircon has a characteristic signature — a specific ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-13 — that indicates the presence of photosynthetic life.

“We need to think differently about the early Earth,” Bell said.

Wendy Mao, an associate professor of geological sciences and photon science at Stanford University, is the other co-author of the research. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation and a Simons Collaboration on the Origin of Life Postdoctoral Fellowship granted to Bell.

The Daily Galaxy via newsroom.ucla.edu

Image credit: With thanks to photographer and anthropologist, Charlotte Setijadi


. NASA consultant John Delaney brought this up years ago.

Interesting conjecture. Unprovable in any case, and unimportant regardless. It just does not at all matter if there was "life" on earth 4.1, or 3.8, or 2.5 billion years ago.

If it can ever be clearly demonstrated where all the water came from, and when, we will have something interesting. Still not important, but interesting.

And they call this science! They thing they find some free carbon in a crystal, therefore life spontaneously erupted. The chasm between a graphite molecule and ANY form of life is so vast you would need infinite universes of infinite size to have a chance of forming a single life related molecule by chance. If this theory is plausible, I request these guys perform a laboratory demonstration of life spontaneously popping up from ANY formulation of chemical building blocks they desire to use. I'll wait patiently for the result.

Fascinating. The isotopic ratio IS evidence of something, but it is not absolutely clear what.

Clearly, a fine piece of research, but I doubt if any definite conclusions about the when and how of the origin of life have yet been resolved firmly.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)