Today's "Galaxy" Stream: 'The Radio Species' --Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Probability of Life in the Cosmos (VIEW)
Today's "Galaxy" Stream --Dark Matter and Dinosaurs (VIEW)

Interstellar Human Hibernation --Science of Deep-Space Travel from From 'Aliens' to 'Arrival'



In "Passengers,"  a 2016 science-fiction thriller film two space travelers wake up 90 years too soon from an induced hibernation on board a spaceship bound for a new planet. From "Aliens" to "Interstellar," Hollywood has long used suspended animation to overcome the difficulties of deep space travel, but the once-fanciful sci-fi staple is becoming scientific fact. The theory is that a hibernating crew could stay alive over vast cosmic distances, requiring little food, hydration or living space, potentially slashing the costs of interstellar missions and eradicating the boredom of space travel.

But the technology has always been unattainable outside the fertile imaginations of filmmakers from Woody Allen and Ridley Scott to James Cameron and Christopher Nolan—until now.

Atlanta-based Spaceworks Enterprises is using a $500,000 grant from NASA to leverage techniques used on brain trauma and heart attack patients to develop "low metabolic stasis" for missions to Mars and the asteroid belt.
"It takes about six months to get out to Mars... There are a lot of demands, a lot of support equipment required to keep people alive even during that period," said SpaceWorks CEO John Bradford.




The aerospace engineer told a panel in Los Angeles marking the release Wednesday of "Passengers," the latest movie to explore suspended animation, that his company was adapting the medical technique of induced hypothermia to astronautics.

Hospitals lower the core temperature of trauma patients by around 10 degrees Farenheit (12C) to achieve a 70 percent reduction in metabolism, although they are "shut down" for a couple of days rather than the months astronauts would need.

"We're evaluating it. We think it's medically possible," Bradford told journalists.

Morten Tyldum's "Passengers" stars Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence as strangers on a 120-year journey to the distant colony of Homestead II when their hibernation pods wake them 90 years too early.

While the research being done by SpaceWorks could make 180-day journeys to Mars much more affordable, the technology is not capable—not yet—of extending human life to allow for the thousands of years required to reach our next nearest star.

Even at the relatively small Mars-like distances, "induced torpor" is not without its challenges, says Bradford, especially on short missions where astronauts have little time to recover after being woken from stasis.

For deep space travel to be possible the astronauts would need to be in some form of suspended animation as a hibernating crew would require little food, hydration or living space.

"You're going to be tired. In this process, you're not really sleeping, your body doesn't enter a (rapid eye movement) state," said Bradford. "If we look at animal hibernators, they will actually come out of hibernation to sleep and then go back into hibernation."

"Passengers" screenwriter Jon Spaihts says he found himself running into tensions between the dramatic requirements of the movie and "hard science" when it came to designing his hibernation pods.
Neither induced torpor nor any of its most realistic alternatives are "states in which Sleeping Beauty in her bed would look particularly gorgeous," he said.

"The hibernation in this movie is a little more magical just because we need people to look cute in those pods. People floating in a sea of sludge or frozen like popsicles are a little less romantic."
The idea of finding a sufficiently Earthlike planet or moon in the sterile vastness of space is another problem on which science has made giant progress in recent years.

Before 1989 humanity was aware of just nine planets in the universe—those orbiting our own sun—but scientists have since identified some 3,545 "exoplanets" in 2,660 solar systems.

"To have kids wake up these days and think there are thousands and thousands of planets out there, that's a crazy thing to grow up with—knowing there's probably life on these distant worlds," said Tiffany Kataria, a weather specialist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.

NASA says the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, launching in 12 months, will seek out yet more new worlds among the galaxy's brightest stars, where the discovery of Earthling-friendly planets is deemed more likely.
A year later, the James Webb Space Telescope will launch on a mission to provide the clearest picture yet of the chemical composition of interesting exoplanets.

So what are the odds of finding a planet with the right atmosphere, roughly the same gravity and protection from radiation—a real-life version of the Homestead II depicted in "Passengers?" "We simply don't know. It must be out there," says Kataria.

Explore further: NASA investigating deep-space hibernation technology

The Daily Galaxy via AFP , and


I think the only plausible form of space hibernation, is NONE!

If it is going to take y e a r ssssss to get to a distance star or planet, protect the occupants from the hard radiation of space by using heavy metals, then the only solution is not to have humans on board.

Instead; replace them with unfertilized human frozen eggs in an artificial embryo, protected by a low weight container.

20 years out from the destination, have the female egg fertilized and have robots raise the children, that will be born. Then by the time they reach the planet, they will be ready to explore. With knowledge implanted in their brain and various fields of learning.

They could have a million frozen embryo's ready for birth, after the first batch of humans evolve. More than enough to populate a planet.

Our 'bio-suits' are too fragile and short-lived to wear on interstellar exploratory trips. We have to get past the' bio-body-preservation' option and focus on cyber-storage of personality. An immediate solution might be advanced, cyber-hybrid 'bodies' enabling us to plan for centuries-long exploratory missions.

Dr. Burke: I once read a book that used an approach similar to that. My thought at the time was that the author clearly didn't have kids. An eight-year-old, even one that was raised by conscientious human parents, would find glee in the naughty sabotage of the robot tenders. No set of robots will be able to raise children successfully unless and until true AI is developed. But once that happens, the AIs will become the explorers and us humans will just be left at home.

God I wish I could find science web site that does not rely on some stupid sci fi crap to make their point.

How can we trust robots to drive a spaceship for thousands of years without error while we just sleep?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)