Trio of Ancient Galaxies Formed Shortly After the Big Bang (Weekend Feature)
NASA's Pleiades Searching Kepler Mission Database for Habitable Alien Moons

Deep-Ocean Volcanic Eruptions May Act as "Valves" on Earth's Climate





"Deep-seafloor volcanism, which is sort of out of sight, out of mind, may have a long-term feedback into our whole climate system," says Maya Tolstoy, an associate professor at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University. "If we are going to protect Earth we have to understand how the planet functions as a whole."

The intensity of volcanic activity at deeply submerged mid-ocean ridges waxes and wanes on a roughly 100,000-year cycle, according to a new study that might help explain poorly understood variations in Earth's climate that occur on approximately the same timetable.

Cyclical variations in Earth's tilt and orbit--occurring at 23,000-, 41,000- and 100,000-year intervals--are known to strongly influence our planet's long-term climate. They are associated with the coming and going of ice ages that also takes place about every 100,000 years.

In particular, changes in the roundness of Earth's orbit around the Sun unfold on approximately the same 100,000 year cycle as the planet's global swings between icy and temperate conditions. But, the variation in solar radiation reaching Earth due to temporarily larger and smaller distances between our planet and the Sun can't fully explain the magnitude of the climatic shifts.

The new research finds evidence in the profile of sea-floor elevation that volcanic activity at mid-ocean ridges, where molten rock emerges from Earth's interior and creates new planetary crust, coincides with these 100,000-year changes in Earth's orbit and climate. Given that volcanic eruptions release the climate-altering gas carbon-dioxide, significant emissions of the gas might take place during upswings of undersea volcanic activity, potentially affecting the climate at 100,000-year intervals.

"Generally, mid-ocean ridges are thought of as this tiny, not very significant contributor to the carbon cycle and that is true, but that's because they are thought of as a steady-state process. But, if they go through periods of significantly enhanced volcanism and significantly suppressed volcanism, then they may be more important than we thought," said Tolstoy, sole author of the new study accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

Tolstoy's study is complementary to new research published today in the journal Science that finds some glacial cycles are connected to the production of ocean crust.

Changes to the roundness of Earth's orbit, which alter the gravitational force on the planet from the Sun, may flex the planet's crust, intensifying volcanic activity when the already thin, undersea crust stretches out, the study explains. Changes in sea level from periodic melting and rebuilding of ice caps and glaciers could also contribute to a varying frequency of eruptions: When sea level is high, more water creates more pressure at the ocean bottom, which suppresses volcanism, and vice versa, when sea level declines again.

In her research, Tolstoy studied 10 present-day eruptions at mid-ocean ridges and the topography around one mid-ocean ridge where ancient volcanic eruptions had left traces. Because newly formed crust pushes outward from those ridges at a regular pace as it forms, the elevation of the sea floor, representing the buildup of new rock, provides a temporal record of how much outpouring of magma took place when.

From the recent eruptions and other researchers' seismic studies of them, Tolstoy finds that volcanic activity intensified when crust-compressing gravitational forces due to the Moon and Sun were low, underscoring that eruption rates are sensitive to forces of this type, which are also at play as the shape of Earth's orbit gradually changes.

As for the ancient eruptions and the topographic pattern they left behind, she finds that there were fewer or smaller eruptions coinciding with periods when there was less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and when Earth's orbit was closer to being a perfect circle. Also, there were more eruptions during periods of more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and Earth's orbit being more out-of-round. Tolstoy's analysis also shows a correspondence between periods of low sea level and high volcanism and the other way around.

The new findings suggest that changes in both sea level and the shape of Earth's orbit may influence the rate of eruption at these mid-ocean ridges. These changes in seafloor volcanic activity may, in turn, feed back into climate cycles, possibly contributing to glacial cycles, the abrupt end of ice ages and the dominance of the 100,000-year climate cycle, according to the new study.

This research does not put a number on how much carbon dioxide could be released by these undersea eruptions. However, the study suggests that these volcanic eruptions could be acting as a "climatic valve" that causes the flow of greenhouse gases to fluctuate, and that models of the Earth's climate system might be rendered more accurate by including them.

These findings could change the way scientists think about how to model Earth's climate's past behavior and could influence how they predict the planet's future climate, Tolstoy said.


The Daily Galaxy via American Geophysical Union

Image credit:


Deep-ocean Volcano eruptions not only release CO2 but add to the heat being dumped into the environment. Heat emissions from our
energy use may be more important than the CO2. Fossil fuels are 80% of our energy source and are burned for the sole purpose of producing HEAT. The heat emitted by fossil fuels and nuclear power are more than four times that which can be accounted for by the actual rise in air temperature. (Nuclear power emits twice as much waste heat as it converts to electricity). So just how much effect does CO2 actually have on global warming? Because of the focus on CO2 programs are being implemented which are wrong,costly and counter-productive. New licenses are being issued for nuclear plants, and technology is being sold to build more plants in India. Capture-and-storage of CO2 is absurd. To reduce the concentration of CO2 requires the removal of nine. billion tons. The companies who have facilities to remove 100,000 tons a year will have no impact on the CO2 level, much less any impact on global warming. However they expect to be compensated by an amount equal to the any CO2 tax penalty. Absorbing CO2 from stack gases after the heat has been released is like locking the barn door after the horse is gone.

Annual energy consumption increased 20-fold during the 20th century so it is only natural that CO2 would increase proportionately. Looking at the gradual rise from 300 to 400 ppm is there any point at which anyone could say this is where CO2 became the cause of global warming rather than an indicator of the amount of energy being consumed.(If CO2 is the cause there is now nothing which can stop it. On the other hand if it is not the cause we can stop worrying about the length of time that higher CO2 will be present in the atmosphere, because after fossil and nuclear are replaced with renewable sources which do not add to the heat, such as solar, wind, etc. the higher CO2 will be beneficial. Higher CO2 increases the rate of growth of crops and trees, and for every pound of CO2 converted by photosynthesis 4800 btus of solar energy are absorbed which otherwise would become heat. It is hard to know how fast cooling will take place after the excess heat has been eliminated. During the Paleo period temperatures dropped at a rate of 0.002 *F per year after the apex of the Malenkovitch cycle had been reached. This is also the rate of cooling between 1000 and 1900 A.D. after which the rise in temperature started.

@ Phillip Haddad: Greenhouse Gas theory is that CO2 and CH3 etc act as a blanket to retain heat in the atmosphere that would otherwise radiate into space. Therefore increasing GHG's have been strongly linked to the temperature rise that is well documented.

Therefore the primary measure to avoid further, deleterious rapid warming is cutting GHG emissions.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)