Largest Known Nebula in the Universe Reveals Cosmic Web for 1st Time
"Odd Couple" Galaxies Hint at Ubiquitous Nature of Dark Matter

New Discovery: Inner Regions of Milky Way's Disc Formed First


ESO-VLT-Laser-phot-33a-07 (2)


A breakthrough using data from the Gaia-ESO project has provided evidence backing up theoretically predicted divisions in the chemical composition of the stars that make up the Milky Way's disc – the vast collection of giant gas clouds and billions of stars that give our Galaxy its 'flying saucer' shape. By tracking the fast-produced elements, specifically magnesium, astronomers can determine how rapidly different parts of the Milky Way were formed. The research suggests that stars in the inner regions of the Galactic disc were the first to form, supporting ideas that our Galaxy grew from the inside-out.

Using data from the 8-m VLT in Chile, one of the world's largest telescopes, an international team of astronomers took detailed observations of stars with a wide range of ages and locations in the Galactic disc to accurately determine their 'metallicity': the amount of chemical elements in a star other than hydrogen and helium, the two elements most stars are made from.

Immediately after the Big Bang, the Universe consisted almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, with levels of "contaminant metals" growing over time. Consequently, older stars have fewer elements in their make-up - so have lower metallicity.

"The different chemical elements of which stars - and we - are made are created at different rates - some in massive stars which live fast and die young, and others in sun-like stars with more sedate multi-billion-year lifetimes," said Professor Gerry Gilmore, lead investigator on the Gaia-ESO Project.

Massive stars, which have short lives and die as 'core-collapse supernovae', produce huge amounts of magnesium during their explosive death throes. This catastrophic event can form a neutron star or a black hole, and even trigger the formation of new stars.

The team have shown that older, 'metal-poor' stars inside the Solar Circle – the orbit of our Sun around the centre of the Milky Way, which takes roughly 250 million years to complete – are far more likely to have high levels of magnesium. The higher level of the element inside the Solar Circle suggests this area contained more stars that "lived fast and die young" in the past.

The stars that lie in the outer regions of the Galactic disc - outside the Solar Circle - are predominantly younger, both 'metal-rich' and 'metal-poor', and have surprisingly low magnesium levels compared to their metallicity.




This discovery signifies important differences in stellar evolution across the Milky Way disc, with very efficient and short star formation timescales occurring inside the Solar Circle; whereas, outside the Sun's orbit, star formation took much longer.




"We have been able to shed new light on the timescale of chemical enrichment across the Milky Way disc, showing that outer regions of the disc take a much longer time to form," said Maria Bergemann from Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy, who led the study.

"This supports theoretical models for the formation of disc galaxies in the context of Cold Dark Matter cosmology, which predict that galaxy discs grow inside-out."

The findings offer new insights into the assembly history of our Galaxy, and are the part of the first wave of new observations from the Gaia-ESO survey, the ground-based extension to the Gaia space mission - launched by the European Space Agency at the end of last year - and the first large-scale survey conducted on one the world's largest telescopes: the 8-m VLT in Paranal, Chile.

The study is published online today through the astronomical database Astro-ph, and has been submitted to the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The new research also sheds further light on another much debated "double structure" in the Milky Way's disc – the so-called 'thin' and 'thick' discs.

"The thin disc hosts spiral arms, young stars, giant molecular clouds – all objects which are young, at least in the context of the Galaxy," explains Aldo Serenelli from the Institute of Space Sciences (Barcelona), a co-author of the study. "But astronomers have long suspected there is another disc, which is thicker, shorter and older. This thick disc hosts many old stars that have low metallicity."

During the latest research, the team found that:

Stars in the young, 'thin' disc aged between 0 – 8 billion years all have a similar degree of metallicity, regardless of age in that range, with many of them considered 'metal-rich'.
There is a "steep decline" in metallicity for stars aged over 9 billion years, typical of the 'thick' disc, with no detectable 'metal-rich' stars found at all over this age.

"From what we now know, the Galaxy is not an 'either-or' system. You can find stars of different ages and metal content everywhere!" said Bergemann. "There is no clear separation between the thin and thick disc. The proportion of stars with different properties is not the same in both discs - that's how we know these two discs probably exist – but they could have very different origins."

Added Gilmore: "This study provides exciting new evidence that the inner parts of the Milky Way's thick disc formed much more rapidly than did the thin disc stars, which dominate near our Solar neighbourhood."

In theory, say astronomers, the thick disc - first proposed by Gilmore 30 years ago - could have emerged in a variety of ways, from massive gravitational instabilities to consuming satellite galaxies in its formative years. "The Milky Way has cannibalised many small galaxies during its formation. Now, with the Gaia-ESO Survey, we can study the detailed tracers of these events, essentially dissecting the belly of the beast," said Greg Ruchti, a researcher at Lund Observatory in Sweden, who co-leads the project.

With upcoming releases of Gaia-ESO, an even better handle on the age-metallicity relation and the structure of the Galactic disc is expected, say the team. In a couple of years, these data will be complemented by positions and kinematics provided by the Gaia satellite and together will revolutionise the field of Galactic astronomy.

The Daily Galaxy via University of Cambridge


When Charles Darwin wrote Evolution of a Species he would have never have contemplated the effect it would have on the scientific community, now with mounting evidence of the structure and evolution of the universe, we are on the verge of the same cosmic shaking event. How did the universe begin and how did it evolve? In order to understand the present on must know of the past, and in order to see the future one must comprehend the present.

This is a confirmation of "The Universal Matrix of Natural Systems and Life's Cycles Theory" model for astronomical systems made 30 years ago when the academic Nebular Theory was suggesting the different model. There are two important details that astronomers today are ignoring:

1) the formation of galaxies were ruled by two different processes, like the formation of cell's systems had two processes: first, for original galaxies, the symbiotic process, and then, the later systems learned how to replicates themselves by self-recycling.

2) The Periodic Table of elements shows that the formation and evolution of those elements were ruled by the same process that rules the evolution of biological systems: the process of life's cycle. So, when at each 7 elements, the next one repeats the properties of the first one. ( ok, that's theory against theories)

DUH that was a no brainer for me. What happens when you pull the plug in the bathtub. The water nearest the drain starts to bunch up before anywhere else and get suck down the drain first. The black hole at the centre of the milkyway is the same as the drain in the tub. `


Quote: "The research suggests that stars in the inner regions of the Galactic disc were the first to form, supporting ideas that our Galaxy grew from the inside-out"

AD: For some decades I´ve been convinced that the formation in our galaxy really is a circuit of formation and our Solar System once was created right in the center of our galaxy and you can find many comments on this issue by googling "Ivar Nielsen+DailyGalaxy" and skim the 661 results.

- Spiral galaxies are not just galaxies. They can be categorized in 2 main types:

1. Galaxies with at very tight-spindled arms and an overall inwards turning motion with a very luminous center, suggesting a high velocity of a beginning star formation. (A young galaxy)

2: Galaxies with open spindled arms and a less luminous center and 2 (4) bars telling of a slower velocity of formation and an overall outgoing motion via the bars. (A mature galaxy)

It is obvious just by looking at the Milky Way structure and rotation that the formation takes place in the galactic center and that mini-galaxies; stars and planets are slung out from the center and out in the galactic arms.

It is impossible for the stars in the galactic arms to take a 90-degree abrupt turn from the arms and into the bars and further into the center if supposing an inwards going motion as assumed by the gravity ideas.

Here we now have the explanation of the "galactic rotation anomaly": The observed formation confirms the factual galactic rotation curve - and it contradicts a "heavy gravity mass" and a "black hole" in the galactic center. All stars are formed in the middle and have moved out in the galactic surroundings, all with a mutual speed, originated from the galactic center.

But the formation does not "begin from within" as stated in this article. We are talking of a cycle of formation where gas and matter in the first hand is assembled from the outer part when our galaxy was young and after a certain assembling, the formation "turns around" and goes outwards in a now "mature galaxy", thus showing a full cycle of galactic formation.

The galactic formation does not origin from the Milky Way "collisions" and "swallowing up" mini-galaxies and so on. The mini galaxies are also a Milky Way formation going from within and out in the galactic arms.

Regarding the gaseous and metallicity of starry and planetary compositions, this all depends of the overall and cyclical galactic composition and of the actual composition of the original assembling of gas and matter.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)