"Several Tens of Billions of Potentially Habitable, Earth-size Planets in the Milky Way"
Follow the Daily Galaxy
Add Daily Galaxy to igoogle page AddThis Feed Button Join The Daily Galaxy Group on Facebook Follow The Daily Galaxy Group on twitter
 

« "Our Understanding of Gravity is Fundamentally Wrong" --Two Conflicting Theories of the Universe | Main | 1st Black Holes Discovered in Milky Way Star Clusters --"May Produce 'Ripples' in Spacetime" »

November 05, 2013

"Several Tens of Billions of Potentially Habitable, Earth-size Planets in the Milky Way"

 

Alma-milky-way-panorama


“It’s been nearly 20 years since the discovery of the first extrasolar planet around a normal star. Since then, we have learned that most stars have planets of some size orbiting them, and that Earth-size planets are relatively common in close-in orbits that are too hot for life,” said Andrew Howard, a former UC Berkeley post-doctoral fellow who is now on the faculty of the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii. “With this result, we’ve come home, in a sense, by showing that planets like our Earth are relatively common throughout the Milky Way Galaxy.”

“Some may have thick atmospheres, making it so hot at the surface that DNA-like molecules would not survive. Others may have rocky surfaces that could harbor liquid water suitable for living organisms,” said Geoffrey Marcy, UC Berkeley professor of astronomy. “We don’t know what range of planet types and their environments are suitable for life.

“For NASA, this discovery is really important, because future missions will try to take an actual picture of a planet, and the size of the telescope they have to build depends on how close the nearest Earth-size planets are,” Howard said. “An abundance of planets orbiting nearby stars simplifies such follow-up missions.”

NASA’s Kepler space telescope, now crippled and its four-year mission at an end, nevertheless provided enough data to answer its main research question: How many of the 200 billion stars in our galaxy have potentially habitable planets?

 

Habitable-zone-illustration (1)


Analysis by UC Berkeley and University of Hawaii astronomers shows that one in five sun-like stars have potentially habitable, Earth-size planets and a surface temperature conducive to life.

Given that about 20 percent of stars are sun-like, the researchers say, that amounts to several tens of billions of potentially habitable, Earth-size planets in the Milky Way Galaxy.

“When you look up at the thousands of stars in the night sky, the nearest sun-like star with an Earth-size planet in its habitable zone is probably only 12 light years away and can be seen with the naked eye. That is amazing,” said UC Berkeley graduate student Erik Petigura, who led the analysis of the Kepler data

Petigura, Howard and Marcy will publish their analysis and findings this week in the online early edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The authors find that 22% of Sun-like stars harbor a planet between one and two times the size of Earth in the habitable zone. The team cautioned that Earth-size planets in orbits about the size of Earth’s are not necessarily hospitable to life, even if they reside in the habitable zone around a star where the temperature is not too hot and not too cold.”

Last week, however, Howard, Marcy and their colleagues provided hope that many such planets actually are rocky and could support liquid water. They reported that one Earth-size planet discovered by Kepler – albeit, a planet with a likely temperature of 2,000 Kelvin, which is far too hot for life as we know it – is the same density as Earth and most likely composed of rock and iron, like Earth.

 

            Astronomersa

 

“This gives us some confidence that when we look out into the habitable zone, the planets Erik is describing may be Earth-size, rocky planets,” Howard said.

NASA launched the Kepler space telescope in 2009 to look for planets outside the solar system that cross in front of, or transit, their stars, which causes a slight diminution – about one hundredth of 1 percent – in the star’s brightness. From among the 150,000 stars photographed every 30 minutes for four years, NASA’s Kepler team reported more than 3,000 planet candidates. Many of these are much larger than Earth – ranging from large planets with thick atmospheres, like Neptune, to gas giants like Jupiter – or in orbits so close to their stars that they are roasted.

To sort them out, Petigura and his colleagues are using the Keck telescopes in Hawaii to obtain spectra of as many stars as possible. This will help them determine each star’s true brightness and calculate the diameter of each transiting planet, with an emphasis on Earth-diameter planets.

Independently, Petigura, Howard and Marcy focused on the 42,000 stars that are like the sun or slightly cooler and smaller, and found 603 candidate planets orbiting them. Only 10 of these were Earth-size, that is, one to two times the diameter of Earth and orbiting their star at a distance where they are heated to lukewarm temperatures suitable for life. The team’s definition of habitable is that a planet receives between four times and one-quarter the amount of light that Earth receives from the sun.

What distinguishes the team’s analysis from previous analyses of Kepler data is that they subjected Petigura’s planet-finding algorithms to a battery of tests in order to measure how many habitable zone, Earth-size planets they missed. Petigura actually introduced fake planets into the Kepler data in order to determine which ones his software could detect and which it couldn’t.

The field of view of the Kepler space telescope, located in the constellation Cygnus, just above the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy. Kepler made precise measurements of the brightnesses of 156,000 stars for four years.

“What we’re doing is taking a census of extrasolar planets, but we can’t knock on every door. Only after injecting these fake planets and measuring how many we actually found could we really pin down the number of real planets that we missed,” Petigura said.

Accounting for missed planets, as well as the fact that only a small fraction of planets are oriented so that they cross in front of their host star as seen from Earth, allowed them to estimate that 22 percent of all sun-like stars in the galaxy have Earth-size planets in their habitable zones.

“The primary goal of the Kepler mission was to answer the question, ‘When you look up in the night sky, what fraction of the stars that you see have Earth-size planets at lukewarm temperatures so that water would not be frozen into ice or vaporized into steam, but remain a liquid, because liquid water is now understood to be the prerequisite for life?’” Marcy said. “Until now, no one knew exactly how common potentially habitable planets were around sun-like stars in the galaxy.”

All of the potentially habitable planets found in the team’s survey are around K stars, which are cooler and slightly smaller than the sun, Petigura said. But the researchers’ analysis shows that the result for K stars can be extrapolated to G stars like the sun. Had Kepler survived for an extended mission, it would have obtained enough data to directly detect a handful of Earth-size planets in the habitable zones of G-type stars.

“If the stars in the Kepler field are representative of stars in the solar neighborhood, … then the nearest (Earth-size) planet is expected to orbit a star that is less than 12 light-years from Earth and can be seen by the unaided eye,” the researchers wrote in their paper. “Future instrumentation to image and take spectra of these Earths need only observe a few dozen nearby stars to detect a sample of Earth-size planets residing in the habitable zones of their host stars.”

In January, the team reported a similar analysis of Kepler data for scorched planets that orbit close to their stars. The new, more complete analysis shows that “nature makes about as many planets in hospitable orbits as in close-in orbits,” Howard said.

The research was funded by UC Berkeley and the National Science Foundation, with the assistance of the W. M. Keck Observatory and NASA.

The Daily Galaxy via http://www.berkeley.edu/

Image top of page: Courtesy of Alma Observatory, Chile/ESO

Comments

We here at the Perspective Research Department have discovered that there are hundreds of not only habitable planets, but advanced civilizations within the immediate area surrounding Terra.

Unfortunately, after monitoring our radio and TV broadcasts, they have correctly concluded that we are NUTS, and should be quarantined for the foreseeable future!

I am optimistic we humans will definately find earth like planets suitable for life with 100% proof in next 15 years.the only question remains about is how to travel that mind boggling distance to reach all of those.if our scientists can able to solve this ,I think we can solve most of the problems we humans are facing today.just imagine million of resourceful planets habitable and easily reachable too.the time have come .we should give it a shape of a movement,irrespective of our problems, ethnicity and religion.we are like a frog who could not imagine or accept a realm outside the well in which he lives.we should leap out now...


“...because liquid water is now understood to be the prerequisite for life?’

This sounds so outdated and implausible unless one is seeking worlds populated by twins of earth organisms (which is of course widely the case). The estimate is still useful, though, because it expands dramatically if one posits that ‘life’ shouldn’t be strictly limited to liquid-water-worlds. Some important researchers are now swinging back to tis point of view. If we can indeed expand looking for life to non-water habitats/chemistries, then the opportunities for ‘life’ are maybe magnitudes more than “tens of billions’.

Absolutely correct resonanz. Beyond that i think quantum computers will be able to simulate the birth of life and its many possible outcomes. Far better than our current supercomputers. If we cannot go or send probes to these alien worlds to confirm our suspicions about how, when, and why life arise from base chemicals. Then we must turn to simulation. You take all the known variables, let the computer run endless simulations of galaxy formation. It should after a while give a good indication of how likely or common/rare the emergence of life can be. If we can get the variables correct, and that's a pretty big if. Considering we are still trying to explain how the universe has come to its current form.

At present this body of study is better left to science fiction writers. When we develop and implement the power of fusion into our economy and space travel then maybe we can talk about it in a couple centuries,


Post a comment

« "Our Understanding of Gravity is Fundamentally Wrong" --Two Conflicting Theories of the Universe | Main | 1st Black Holes Discovered in Milky Way Star Clusters --"May Produce 'Ripples' in Spacetime" »




1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8





9


11


12


13


14


15

Our Partners

technology partners

A


19


B

About Us/Privacy Policy

For more information on The Daily Galaxy and to contact us please visit this page.



E