Image of the Day: The Ancient Supervolcanos of Mars
The Early-Earth "Weak, Cold Sun" Paradox --Enigma of Origins of Life

A Pale Red Dot --The Most Distant Object in the Universe


090429b_ann1 (1)

A gamma-ray burst known as GRB 090429B for the 29 April 2009 date when it was detected by NASA's Swift satellite has been found to be a candidate for the most distant object in the Universe at an estimated distance of 13.14 billion light years. The burst lies far beyond any known quasar and could be more distant than any previously known galaxy or gamma-ray burst. The gigantic burst of gamma rays erupted from an exploding star when the Universe was less than 4% of its present age, just 520 million years old, and less than 10% of its present size.

"The galaxy hosting the progenitor star of GRB 090429B was truly one of the first galaxies in the Universe," said Derek Fox, associate professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State and a co-author of the paper. "Beyond the possible cosmic distance record, GRB 090429B illustrates how gamma-ray bursts can be used to reveal the locations of massive stars in the early Universe and to track the processes of early galaxy and star formation that eventually led to the galaxy-rich cosmos we see around us today."

Gamma-ray bursts, the brightest explosions known, occur somewhere within the observable Universe at a rate of about two per day. Because of their extreme brightness, gamma-ray bursts can be detected by Swift and other satellite observatories even when they occur at distances of billions of light years. While the bursts themselves last for minutes at most, their fading "afterglow" light remains observable from premier astronomical facilities for days to weeks. Detailed studies of the afterglow during this time, when feasible, allow astronomers to measure the distance to the burst.

These afterglow measurements were used to determine a cosmic distance record in 2009 for an earlier gamma-ray burst, GRB 090423 at a distance of 13.04 billion light years from Earth, making it temporarily the "most distant object in the Universe."

This record was surpassed by galaxy discoveries in 2010 and 2011 that pushed the cosmic frontier out to 13.07 billion light years, and potentially even further. "Our extreme estimate of the distance to GRB 090429B makes this a sort of 'revenge of the bursts'," said Antonino Cucchiara, at the University of California, Berkeley. "A gamma-ray burst is once more contending for the title of most distant object in the cosmos -- beyond the previously known most-distant quasars and galaxies."

Less than a week after the record-setting GRB 090423 made headlines around the world, this new burst, GRB 090429B, appeared in the sky with suspiciously similar properties. As with the previous burst, GRB 090429B was a short-lived event, lasting less than 10 seconds, and automated Swift observations showed it to have a relatively faint X-ray afterglow. Cucchiara, then a graduate student at Penn State, woke up in the early morning hours to direct observations at the Gemini North telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, that he hoped would pin down the nature of this burst.

Cucchiara and colleagues found that, while the afterglow was visible in infrared observations, no optical light could be detected. This "drop out" behavior is a distinctive signature of the most-distant objects, and has been used for initial identification of all of the most-distant quasars, galaxies, and gamma-ray bursts.

Cucchiara requested an immediate spectrum of the GRB 090429B afterglow from the Gemini operators, which would have provided a definitive measurement of the distance to the burst. Unfortunately, just as the spectrum was about to be taken, clouds blew in over the summit of Mauna Kea and hid the afterglow from sight. By the next night, the afterglow was too faint to yield a useful spectrum, and over the following nights it faded from view completely.

"It was frustrating to lose sight of this burst, but the hints we had were so exciting there was no chance of us letting it go," said Cucchiara, who presented an initial study of the burst as part of his doctoral thesis at Penn State.

Determined not to let GRB 090429B become "the burst that got away," the team spent two years carrying out a careful examination of their data to see if the burst is truly a candidate record-breaker, or might be a partially-obscured burst in a galaxy at a less dramatic distance. Importantly, this work has meant gathering new data -- deep observations with Gemini and the Hubble Space Telescope that would have revealed a galaxy at the burst position in any of the less-dramatic scenarios.

This evidence, including the missing galaxy, indicates that the burst is extremely likely -- a 99.3 percent chance -- to be the most distant cosmic explosion, beyond the record set by GRB 090423.

Whether GRB 090429B is now the most distant object in the Universe depends on several factors which are not precisely known. First, it must lie beyond the 13.07-billion-light-year distance to a galaxy reported in 2010 by a team of astronomers led by Matthew Lehnert at the Observatoire de Paris.

This is very likely to be the case, at 98.9% probability, but is not certain. It also has to lie beyond the distance of a galaxy reported in 2011 by a team of astronomers led by Rychard Bouwens of U.C. Santa Cruz. This could be either easy or hard: The Bouwens team estimates that there is a 20% chance their galaxy is not a record breaker at all, but simply a faint galaxy at a relatively modest distance; on the other hand, if the Bouwens galaxy is a record-breaker, it is very distant indeed, from 13.11 to 13.28 billion light years away, and there is only a 4.8% chance that GRB 090429B is more distant than that. Overall, and treating these uncertainties as perfectly understood, there is a 23% chance that GRB 090429B is now the most distant known object in the Universe, the astronomers said.

It should be possible in the future to use the bright afterglows of bursts like GRB 090423 and GRB 090429B to explore the conditions of star and galaxy formation at these early cosmic epochs in detail. "Discovering extremely distant bursts is pretty fun," says Fox, "but we suspect there is a whole lot more information in the bursts, waiting for us, that we have yet to access."

The Daily Galaxy via Pennsylvania State University

Image Credit: Gemini Observatory/AURA/NASA/ Levan, Tanvir, Cucchiara, Fox


Wow. Here's one to break the Big Bang theory. At such a great distance in time (just 500 million years after the BB) an object creates a Gamma Ray burst. Here's what wikipedia says about GR bursters: "Most observed GRBs are believed to consist of a narrow beam of intense radiation released during a supernova or hypernova as a rapidly rotating, high-mass star collapses to form a neutron star, quark star, or black hole."

Okay. This means an object that becomes a GR burster has to have great mass--metals, in other words. But 520 m/y is not enough time for a pure hydrogen/helium universe to have evolved into secondary mass accretions that would lead to massive stars (or objects) that could become GR bursters. This suggests that the universe is much more than 13.9 b/y old. Much, much older--even taken into account inflation (the other bit of duct-tape that holds the BB theory in place).

Strange this one,if the universe had a secondary period of inflation after about 6 billion years it would mean that most of the matter that had formed from the initial bb would be far beyond our current ability to detect it.surely we are only seeing the results of the first inflationary period.we could really be looking at our universe being at least 30 billion years young and possibly double this,I'm afraid the bb theory is becoming increasingly unlikely.

Dr. Paul Cook, The existence of gamma ray bursts 500 million years after the big bang is in no way a challenge to the Big Bang theory. Based on current theory, the universe was dark until about 100 million years post bang when the light elements (H, He) had collapsed into the first stars. Given the volume of the universe at that time was still a fraction of what it is now, much more matter (albeit H and He) was contained in it, and we can see the result: hypermassive stars are more common in the early universe than today. Hypermassive stars live fast and die young: from 250,000 to 35 million years. Hypermassive stars are also hot enough to produce heavy elements on their own: they don't need to absorb heavy metals. While there are many gaps in the theory, this is not one of them.

If it blew up then its no longer the most distant object. Also at 13 billion light years, it blew up quite a long time ago so at the time of detection it already wasnt in existence.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)