Neandertal Technology --New Discovery Shows They Made Planet's First Bone Tools
Human Evolutionary Change 100 Times Higher in Past 5,000 Years (Today's Most Popular)

Asteroid Impact May have Triggered Evolution of Earth's Multicellular Life (Today's Most Popular)

 

 

                           6a00d8341bf7f753ef01348874127b970c-320wi


A massive asteroid that struck South Australia during a glacial cold snap 590 million years ago may have triggered the evolution of Earth’s earliest complex organisms, Australian geologists reported. In 2010, researchers from the University of Adelaide argued that the Acraman asteroid impact coincided with an extensive glaciation period more than 500 million years ago and created ideal conditions for an explosion of complex organisms, known as the Ediacara biota.

The Ediacaran Period was characterized by the oldest definite multicellular organisms with tissues, and the most common types resemble segmented worms, fronds, disks, or immobile bags that had little resemblance to modern lifeforms -their relationship even with the later lifeforms of the Cambrian explosion is difficult to interpret.

“Release from the combined environmental stresses of a frigid, glacial climate near sea level and a major impact in low latitudes may have been a factor influencing subsequent Ediacaran biotic evolution,” geologist Victor Gostin and colleagues wrote in their paper in the Australian Journal of Earth Sciences.

Originating several million years after the asteroid impact, the Ediacarans are an enigmatic assemblage of multicellular organisms, many of which bare scant resemblance to anything alive today. The first Ediacaran fossils were discovered in the Flinders Ranges in South Australia, 300 km east of the Acraman Impact site.

The Acraman asteroid impact has been the subject of a vast body of research, but this latest study provides evidence that ice may have covered much of the planet - the snowball earth hypothesis - when the asteroid struck.

Gostin and colleagues discovered glacial debris - pebbles and gritty sediments left by floating ice - among the shattered rocks flung out more than 500 km from the impact site. It suggests that the impact occurred during a low-latitude glaciation period, rather than precipitated one as previously proposed.

The impact of the asteroid, which had the energy of 5.2 million tons of TNT, would have been cataclysmic in scale, causing widespread earthquakes, tsunamis and fires. It had a devastating effect on life on earth, which was already enduring the stresses of a severe cold snap.

 

            6a00d8341bf7f753ef0134886f2441970c-500wi

 

According to Gostin, the evidence that important changes took place in the biosphere around the time of the Acraman impact event comes from fossil pollen, carbon isotopes and biomolecular data. “These involve the collapse in primary productivity and the subsequent appearance and diversification of large complex acritarchs (microfossils) and multicellular animals (the famous Ediacaran fossils),” Gostin said.

Astrobiologist Malcolm Walter, from the University of New South Wales in Sydney in an interview with Cosmos Magazine compares it to the rapid diversification of mammals that followed the demise of the dinosaurs, but raises his own question: “What went extinct [before the Ediacara biota]? What we seem to see is the other side of the coin, a recovery event, a flourishing of new life."


The Daily Galaxy via via Cosmos Magazine.com  and gsa.org.au

Comments

You should stop posting idiotic stories - e.g. mentions pollen at the time, hardly the time of appearance of said unicellular life... you discredit the site.....

So Chandra Wickramasinghe's theory of Panspermia is looking even better.

I am amused that neither of the provided links connect you to anything to do with this article. While I agree with NOB about the pollen reference, the main thrust of the article is not implausible.

5.2 megatons of TNT is not all that much in the scheme of things. The old USSR detonated an H-bomb with a yield 10 times as much and the old US Titan ICBM carried warheads with that kind of yield. If the explosion were in the 5.2 gigaton range, then perhaps the impact would have been more devastating. I agree with NOB, sloppy reporting here.

fires?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)