Globular Cluster Harbors a 13-Billion-Year-Old Planet
Follow the Daily Galaxy
Add Daily Galaxy to igoogle page AddThis Feed Button Join The Daily Galaxy Group on Facebook Follow The Daily Galaxy Group on twitter
 

« Lost Planets --"Could be as Numerous as Stars" | Main | Venus's South Pole Vortex --Strange Behavior of a Whirlwind the Size of Europe »

March 25, 2013

Globular Cluster Harbors a 13-Billion-Year-Old Planet

 

 

           Opo9532b (1)

 

This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image above shows the center of globular cluster M4. It contains several tens of thousands stars and is noteworthy in being home to many white dwarfs—the cores of ancient, dying stars whose outer layers have drifted away into space.

In July 2003, Hubble helped make the astounding discovery of a planet called PSR B1620-26 b, 2.5 times the mass of Jupiter, which is located in this cluster. The PSR B1620-26 system lies around 5,600 light years away in globular cluster M4, boxed in green, directly west of red supergiant star Antares in Constellation ScorpiusIts age is estimated to be around 13 billion years—almost three times as old as the Solar System! It is also unusual in that it orbits a binary system of a white dwarf and a pulsar (a type of neutron star).

 

                                  PSR B1620-26_star

The existence of a 13-billion year old planet, if in fact it still exists, highlights the fact that our Solar System exits in a universe that is estimated to be between 13.5 and 14 billion years old. Some astronomers, including Sir Martin Rees of Cambridge University  believe that there could be advanced civilizations out there that have existed for 1.8 gigayears (one gigayear = one billion years) and longer.

A few intrepid astronomers have concluded that the most productive to look for planets that can support life is around dim, dying stars white dwarfs so prevalent in M4. 

"In the quest for extraterrestrial biological signatures, the first stars we study should be white dwarfs," said Avi Loeb, theorist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) and director of the Institute for Theory and Computation. Even dying stars could host planets with life - and if such life exists, we might be able to detect it within the next decade. This encouraging result comes from a new theoretical study of Earth-like planets orbiting white dwarf stars. Researchers found that we could detect oxygen in the atmosphere of a white dwarf's planet much more easily than for an Earth-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star.

When a star like the Sun dies, it puffs off its outer layers, leaving behind a hot core called a white dwarf. A typical white dwarf is about the size of Earth. It slowly cools and fades over time, but it can retain heat long enough to warm a nearby world for billions of years. Since a white dwarf is much smaller and fainter than the Sun, a planet would have to be much closer in to be habitable with liquid water on its surface. A habitable planet would circle the white dwarf once every 10 hours at a distance of about a million miles.* Before a star becomes a white dwarf it swells into a red giant, engulfing and destroying any nearby planets. Therefore, a planet would have to arrive in the habitable zone after the star evolved into a white dwarf. A planet could form from leftover dust and gas (making it a second-generation world), or migrate inward from a larger distance.

If planets exist in the habitable zones of white dwarfs, we would need to find them before we could study them. The abundance of heavy elements on the surface of white dwarfs suggests that a significant fraction of them have rocky planets. Loeb and his colleague Dan Maoz (Tel Aviv University) estimate that a survey of the 500 closest white dwarfs could spot one or more habitable Earths.

The best method for finding such planets is a transit search - looking for a star that dims as an orbiting planet crosses in front of it. Since a white dwarf is about the same size as Earth, an Earth-sized planet would block a large fraction of its light and create an obvious signal.

More importantly, we can only study the atmospheres of transiting planets. When the white dwarf's light shines through the ring of air that surrounds the planet's silhouetted disk, the atmosphere absorbs some starlight. This leaves chemical fingerprints showing whether that air contains water vapor, or even signatures of life, such as oxygen.

Astronomers are particularly interested in finding oxygen because the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere is continuously replenished, through photosynthesis, by plant life. Were all life to cease on Earth, our atmosphere would quickly become devoid of oxygen, which would dissolve in the oceans and oxidize the surface. Thus, the presence of large quantities of oxygen in the atmosphere of a distant planet would signal the likely presence of life there.

NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scheduled for launch by the end of this decade, promises to sniff out the gases of these alien worlds. Loeb and Maoz created a synthetic spectrum, replicating what JWST would see if it examined a habitable planet orbiting a white dwarf. They found that both oxygen and water vapor would be detectable with only a few hours of total observation time.

"JWST offers the best hope of finding an inhabited planet in the near future," said Maoz.* Recent research by CfA astronomers Courtney Dressing and David Charbonneau showed that the closest habitable planet is likely to orbit a red dwarf star (a cool, low-mass star undergoing nuclear fusion). Since a red dwarf, although smaller and fainter than the Sun, is much larger and brighter than a white dwarf, its glare would overwhelm the faint signal from an orbiting planet's atmosphere. JWST would have to observe hundreds of hours of transits to have any hope of analyzing the atmosphere's composition.

"Although the closest habitable planet might orbit a red dwarf star, the closest one we can easily prove to be life-bearing might orbit a white dwarf," said Loeb. 

The Daily Galaxy via  Arxiv, and Harvard-Smithsonian CfA 

Comments

Another hole in the Big Bang Boat. A planet that's 13 billion years old could not have formed in just the 700 million years since the big bang. There wouldn't have been enough heavy metals to form such a planetary system. But if the universe was much much older, then such a planet is possible. But watch, now, as cosmologists start to fudge the BB date further and further back in time. Which is what they're doing here. (And it's a dodge to start talking instead about alien civilizations. That's not the issue. The issue is the profound problems this planet causes the Big Bang.)

How did you come to the conclusion that the planets would be formed in 700million years, and wouldnt we be looking through the jwst of what was whatever age relative to how far we are looking, i cant wait to find out what they see through that telescope, and sorry mate, dont bust my balls about the question, im no physicist, just a boy curious about space, wish i had taken physics in school tho.

I wonder if this gas giant has a host of moons like Jupiter does. If this is a first generation planet, then it probably doesn't have rocky moons right? If only we could see close enough, gas giants might be worth looking at in the search for ETI so we could peep their moons for oxygen.


Post a comment

« Lost Planets --"Could be as Numerous as Stars" | Main | Venus's South Pole Vortex --Strange Behavior of a Whirlwind the Size of Europe »




1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8





9


11


12


13


14


15

Our Partners

technology partners

A


19


B

About Us/Privacy Policy

For more information on The Daily Galaxy and to contact us please visit this page.



E