Colossal Black Hole Equal to 17 Billion Suns Discovered ('2012 Most Popular')
"Pillars of Creation" --A Galactic Artifact Vaporized by a Supernova Explosion 6,000 Years Ago ('2012 Most Popular')

"No Jupiter, No Advanced Life? " ('2012 Most Popular')





What are the implications of a star systems missing a massive gas giant such as our Solar Systems'Jupiter --it could imply conditions of massive bombardment from comets and asteeoids that would prevent the development of advanced life.

The artist's impression below of the debris disc and planets around the star known as Gliese 581, superimposed on Herschel PACS images at 70, 100 and 160 micrometre wavelengths. The line drawing superimposed on the Herschel image gives a schematic representation of the location and orientation of the star, planets and disc, albeit not to scale. GJ 581’s planets have masses between 2 and 15 Earth masses and are all located within 0.22 Astronomical Units (AU, where 1 AU is the distance between Earth and our Sun) of the central star. Minus a Jupiter-like gas giant, a vast debris disc extends from approximately 25 AU to 60 AU.  



Two NASA astronomers recently suggested that the size and location of an asteroid belt, shaped by the evolution of the sun's planet-forming disk and by the gravitational influence of a nearby giant Jupiter-like planet, may determine whether complex life will evolve on an Earth-like planet

Rebecca Martin, a NASA Sagan Fellow from the University of Colorado in Boulder, and astronomer Mario Livioof the Space Telescope Science Institute have concluded that Solar systems with life-bearing planets may be rare if they are dependent on the presence of asteroid belts of just the right mass.

Asteroids may have delivered water and organic compounds to the early Earth. According to the theory of punctuated equilibrium, occasional asteroid impacts might accelerate the rate of biological evolution by disrupting a planet's environment to the point where species must try new adaptation strategies. The astronomers based their conclusion on an analysis of theoretical models and archival observations, including infrared data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope.

"Our study shows that only a tiny fraction of planetary systems observed to date seem to have giant planets in the right location to produce an asteroid belt of the appropriate size, offering the potential for life on a nearby rocky planet," said Martin, the study's lead author. "Our study suggests that our solar system may be rather special."

Martin and Livio suggest that the location of an asteroid belt relative to a Jupiter-like planet is not an accident. The asteroid belt in our solar system, located between Mars and Jupiter, is a region of millions of space rocks that sits near the "snow line," which marks the border of a cold region where volatile material such as water ice is far enough from the sun to remain intact.

When Jupiter formed just beyond the snow line, its powerful gravity prevented nearby material inside its orbit from coalescing and building planets. Instead, Jupiter's influence caused the material to collide and break apart. These fragmented rocks settled into an asteroid belt around the sun.

"To have such ideal conditions you need a giant planet like Jupiter that is just outside the asteroid belt [and] that migrated a little bit, but not through the belt," Livio explained. "If a large planet like Jupiter migrates through the belt, it would scatter the material. If, on the other hand, a large planet did not migrate at all, that, too, is not good because the asteroid belt would be too massive. There would be so much bombardment from asteroids that life may never evolve."

Using our solar system as a model, Martin and Livio proposed that asteroid belts in other solar systems would always be located approximately at the snow line. To test their proposal, Martin and Livio created models of planet-forming disks around young stars and calculated the location of the snow line in those disks based on the mass of the central star.

They then looked at all the existing space-based infrared observations from the Spitzer Space Telescope of 90 stars having warm dust, which could indicate the presence of an asteroid belt-like structure. The temperature of the warm dust was consistent with that of the snow line. "The warm dust falls right onto our calculated snow lines, so the observations are consistent with our predictions," Martin said.

The duo then studied observations of the 520 giant planets found outside our solar system. Only 19 of them reside outside the snow line. This suggests that most of the giant planets that may have formed outside the snowline have migrated too far inward to preserve the kind of slightly dispersed asteroid belt needed to foster enhanced evolution of life on an Earth-like planet near the belt. Apparently, less than four percent of the observed systems may actually harbor such a compact asteroid belt.

"Based on our scenario, we should concentrate our efforts to look for complex life in systems that have a giant planet outside of the snow line," Livio said.

The illustration below shows three possible scenarios for the evolution of asteroid belts. In the top panel, a Jupiter-size planet migrates through the asteroid belt, scattering material and inhibiting the formation of life on planets. The second scenario shows our solar-system model: a Jupiter-size planet that moves slightly inward but is just outside the asteroid belt. In the third illustration, a large planet does not migrate at all, creating a massive asteroid belt. Material from the hefty asteroid belt would bombard planets, possibly preventing life from evolving.

New research based on an analysis of theoretical models and archival observations, including infrared data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope, suggests that the second scenario may also be important for the development of life in other solar systems.

The Sagan Fellowship Program is administered by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute at theCalifornia Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., whose purpose is to advance the scientific and technical goals of NASA's Exoplanet Exploration Program. 




The Daily Galaxy via

Image credits: ESA/AOES and Hubble/IRTF Composite Image of Jupiter Storms. Credit: NASA, ESA, IRTF, A. Sánchez-Lavega and R. Hueso (Universidad del País Vasco, Spain )


theories I heard were that if Jupiter had not formed another terrestrial planet would have most liked formed in the place of the asteroid belt.

"No Jupiter, No Advanced Life? " ('2012 Most Popular')

- Actually the short answer is NO.

This will be almost true if you accept that all star systems which is harboring Earth like conditions is so much attacked by asteroids, but as we know - so far our is "unique". Unique by this configuration, but if we just for a second imagine that the Oort cloud is gone, and the asteroids is very rare - then there would be no need of our "big brother" Jupiter to save Us - isn't it ?

Another possible configuration is just to be again the 3rd or 4th planet, but if we assume that the imaginary star system is consisted by about 20-25 planets which is even twice as big as our - there again a good shield from asteroids.

Another possible configuration - again a few planets ( let say 10 ), but the last ring there is 3 planets following a same orbit toking sequentially most of the "rock attacks".

And another possibility - 2 suns, we are orbiting in the near circle, and the other sun is orbiting in the outer circle - which will most of the time attract the asteroids to itself.

And one more of the infinite number of configurations - low planet configuration star system, but the intelligent life harboring planet is surrounded by 2 or more natural satellites - just like our Moon - shielding very well from the attacks.

Enjoy the infinite possibilities in the advanced life harboring star system configurations! :)

Jupiter by its gravity attracts these wayward bodies that make it into the inner system. Consider that the Earth is enclosed with all its heliosphere brethren in the Oort shell. Strangely this shell seems to heavily magnetized so that there are few comers and goers. For all intents and purposes the shell enclosure is our universe, except for light.
The LMC & the SMC produce large numbers of bubbles, and we may assume the stars inside have orbiting bodies. Supposedly these bubbles are fragile and cannot stand in a spiral galaxy like ours but we may not be able to detect this information. Or the bubbles may have a strong magnetic support that allows them to develop in a spiral like the Milky Way.

If our enclosed bubble is isolating, then only what is already here gets identified. Crushed planets? Dust from when our Sol endured a controlled nova (thanks to the magnetic field gripping our heliosphere) is no problem! Jupiter is handy but the key is that our magnetic grip is so firm that asteroids are seldom allowed to roam. Dust is immediately locked up into planetary rings.

As a matter of fact the low magnetosphere detected on our solar and planetary bodies is not due to a magnetic-as-normal field but an enhanced one, stronger and more tightly wound due to an increase in energy. Perhaps like a cell (L Thomas speculated on this relationship between a cosmic entity and a body's cell) there are times when something like a protein pump operates and allows energy input/output. Light would be able to pass unobstructed, it seems.

Only when the pressure holding the magnetic bubble (the Oort shell) fades will our system be exposed to cosmic forces. I have read theories that say the sun is affected by planetary movements and if our heliosphere is closed that is possible. This is the reason that is speculated for the coming cold age.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)