Image of the Day: First X-Rays from Supernova Beyond Milky Way Discovered
Over fifty years ago, a supernova was discovered in M83, a spiral galaxy about 15 million light years from Earth. Astronomers have used NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory to make the first detection of X-rays emitted by the debris from this explosion.
A relatively short observation — about 14 hours long — from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory in 2000 and 2001 did not detect any X-rays from the remnant of SN 1957D. However, a much longer observation obtained in 2010 and 2011, totaling nearly 8 and 1/2 days of Chandra time, did reveal the presence of X-ray emission. The X-ray brightness in 2000 and 2001 was about the same as or lower than in this deep image.
This set of images above from the Hubble Space Telescope shows optical and H-alpha images of the area around SN 1957D. The optical images, shown at two different zooms, includes one filter at ultraviolet wavelengths and two different filters at optical wavelengths, colored blue, green and red. The H-alpha images show light emitted by hydrogen in red, sulfur in green and oxygen in blue. In each case SN 1957D is located in the middle of the image. In the optical images the star cluster containing the supernova is visible and in the H-alpha images the remains of the supernova are visible. The multipanel shows the optical and H-alpha images next to the Chandra image.
This new Chandra image of M83 at bottom of the page is one of the deepest X-ray observations ever made of a spiral galaxy beyond our own. This full-field view of the spiral galaxy shows the low, medium, and high-energy X-rays observed by Chandra in red, green, and blue respectively. The location of SN 1957D, which is found on the inner edge of the spiral arm just above the galaxy’s center, is outlined in the box.
The new X-ray data from the remnant of SN 1957D provide important information about the nature of this explosion that astronomers think happened when a massive star ran out of fuel and collapsed. The distribution of X-rays with energy suggests that SN 1957D contains a neutron star, a rapidly spinning, dense star formed when the core of pre-supernova star collapsed. This neutron star, or pulsar, may be producing a cocoon of charged particles moving at close to the speed of light known as a pulsar wind nebula.
If this interpretation is confirmed, the pulsar in SN 1957D is observed at an age of 55 years, one of the youngest pulsars ever seen. The remnant of SN 1979C in the galaxy M100 contains another candidate for the youngest pulsar, but astronomers are still unsure whether there is a black hole or a pulsar at the center of SN 1979C.
An image from the Hubble Space Telescope (in the box labeled “Optical Close-Up”) shows that the debris of the explosion that created SN 1957D is located at the edge of a star cluster less than 10 million years old. Many of these stars are estimated to have masses about 17 times that of the Sun. This is just the right mass for a star’s evolution to result in a core-collapse supernova as is thought to be the case in SN 1957D.
The Daily Galaxy via Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Image Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/STScI/K.Long et al., Optical: NASA/STScI
Comments
« Astrobiologists Resurrect a 500-Million-Year-Old Gene --New Insights into Evolution | Main | Sunday's Touchdown of 'Curiosity' --"The 14-Minute Mars-to-Earth Radio Gap" »

What an interesting find.
I would like to know, however, how this is possible:
Early in the article, describing the distance of the observed galaxy: "a supernova was discovered in M83, a spiral galaxy about 15 million light years from Earth."
Later in the artcle, describing what the supernova is close to in it's galaxy: "the debris of the explosion that created SN 1957D is located at the edge of a star cluster less than 10 million years old."
If the star cluster is less than 10 million years old, how did ight from it travel 15 million light years?
Posted by: Beekersguy | July 31, 2012 at 01:20 PM
The cluster was less than 10 million years old when the light started travelling.. it's prob nearly 25 million years old now..
Posted by: Ruth Mc | August 02, 2012 at 10:23 AM
I'm inclined to disagree, as I'm sure light started travelling before the cluster was 10 million years old.
I do however, get your point, which I am also inclined to disagree with, as then the stated age of the cluster would be 25 million years.
Posted by: Beekersguy | August 02, 2012 at 03:33 PM
Aagh that's pretty much what I said. Read it slowly!
Posted by: Ruth Mc | August 03, 2012 at 06:43 AM
Beekersguy
Ages of things in astronomy are normally given with the age we see it as. Mostly because to use its actual age would confuse people going "it doesn't look that old". Of course both are educated guesses.
Posted by: Not Ruth Mc | August 05, 2012 at 02:52 PM