Countdown to Discovery of Alien Life: "10's of Billions of Rocky Planets in Milky Way Habitable Zones" --ESO
New Finding Changes Understanding of Solar System Formation

EcoAlert: Does Cosmic Dust Play a Role in Climate Change?



Although we think of space as being empty, there is more out there than meets the eye – dust, for example, is everywhere. If all the material between the Sun and Jupiter were compressed together it would form a moon 25 km across. Now a new research program will try to see how much of this dust enters the Earth’s atmosphere and its impact on climate change.

Metals from the cosmic dust play a part in various phenomena that affect our climate. An accurate estimate of dust would also help us understand how particles are transported through different layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. Professor John Plane of the University of Leeds will present the Cosmic Dust in the Terrestrial Atmosphere (CODITA) project on Friday 30 March at the National Astronomy meeting in Manchester, England.

CODITA has received a €2.5 million grant from the European Research Council to investigate the dust input over the next 5 years. The international team, led by Plane, is made up of 11 scientists in Leeds and a further 10 research groups in the US and Germany.

“If the dust input is around 200 tons per day, then the particles are being transported down through the middle atmosphere considerably faster than generally believed; if the 5-ton figure is correct, we will need to revise substantially our understanding of how dust evolves in the Solar System and is transported from the middle atmosphere to the surface,” said Plane.

The main sources of dust in the Solar system are collisions between asteroids, and material evaporating off comets as they approach the Sun. When dust particles approach the Earth they enter the atmosphere at very high speeds, anything from 38 000 to 248 000 kilometres an hour, depending on whether they are orbiting in the same direction or the opposite to the Earth’s motion around the Sun.

The particles undergo very rapid heating through collisions with air molecules, reaching temperatures well in excess of 1600 degrees Celsius. At this point they melt and evaporate. Particles with diameters greater than about 2 millimetres give off enough material to produce visible meteors, or “shooting stars”. But most of the mass of dust particles entering the atmosphere are much smaller than this, so can be detected only using specialised meteor radars.

“We have a conundrum – estimates of how much dust comes in vary by a factor of a hundred,” said Plane. “The aim of CODITA is to resolve this huge discrepancy.”

Satellite observations suggest that 100-300 tons of enter the atmosphere each day. This figure tallies with the rate of accumulation in polar ice cores and deep-sea sediments of rare elements linked to cosmic dust, such as iridium and osmium.

However, measurements in the earth’s atmosphere indicate that the input could be as low as 5 tons per day. These measurements include meteor radar observations, laser observations of the sodium and iron atoms from evaporating dust in the upper atmosphere, and measurements by high altitude aircraft of meteoritic iron in the lower stratosphere.

The metals injected into the atmosphere from evaporating dust particles are involved in a diverse range of phenomena linked to climate change.

“Cosmic dust is associated with the formation of ‘noctilucent’ clouds – the highest clouds in the Earth’s atmosphere. The dust particles provide a surface for the cloud’s ice crystals to form. These clouds develop during summer in the polar regions and they appear to be an indicator of climate change,’ said Plane. “The metals from the dust also affect ozone chemistry in the stratosphere. The amount of dust present will be important for any geo-engineering initiatives to increase sulphate aerosol to offset global warming. Cosmic dust also fertilises the ocean with iron, which has potential climate feedbacks because marine phytoplankton emit climate-related gases.”

"Noctilucent clouds are a relatively new phenomenon," says Gary Thomas, a professor at the University of Colorado who studies NLCs. "They were first seen in 1885" about two years after the powerful eruption of Krakatoa hurled plumes of volcanic ash as much as 80 km high in Earth's atmosphere.Ash from the Indonesian volcano caused such splendid sunsets worldwide that evening sky watching became a popular past time.


One sky watcher in particular, a German named T.W. Backhouse who is often credited with the discovery of noctilucent clouds, noticed something odd. He stayed outside after the sun had set and, on some nights, saw wispy filaments glowing electric blue against the black sky. Scientists of the day figured they were some curious manifestation of volcanic ash.Eventually the ash settled and the vivid sunsets of Krakatoa faded. Yet the noctilucent clouds remained. "It's puzzling," says Thomas. "Noctilucent clouds have not only persisted, but also spread."

A century ago the clouds were confined to latitudes above 50o; you had to go to places like Scandinavia, Russia and Britain to see them. In recent years they have been sighted as far south as Utah and Colorado.

The CODITA team will also use laboratory facilities to tackle some of the least well-understood aspects of the problem

“In the lab, we’ll be looking at the nature of cosmic dust evaporation, as well as the formation of meteoric smoke particles, which play a role in ice nucleation and the freezing of polar stratospheric clouds," Plane explained. "The results will be incorporated into a chemistry-climate model of the whole atmosphere. This will make it possible, for the first time, to model the effects of cosmic dust consistently from the outer Solar System to the Earth’s surface.”

The Daily Galaxy via The Royal Astronomical Society and

The image atthe top of the page courtsey of neizvestniy-geniy


Now wasn't some great proponent of climate change/global warming saying that if we don't stop emissions there will be more earthquakes, tsunamis, flooding and Justin Biebers.

Just because something else has been found to contribute (has it ben proved yet?), doesn't mean the previously mentioned reasons become all false.

Seems that climate change is accepted if there’s the possbility of a natural event but then there’s no climate change when we discuss how industrial activity is changing the atmospheric content.

Actually climate change has long been accepted. No one has argued that the polar ice vanishing, the super violent storms or even the extra hot and cold spots all over the globe is not happening. The argument is whats causing it to happen. As always, you can put your head in the sand and believe what you are told, or look around and see many other things that could just as easily cause the warming.

But I was wondering about the dust and just how thick it is on average across the cosmos. Maybe the dust is why 13.8 billion light years is all we can see. Maybe light reacts to the dust in such a way to cause red shifting. I would think that the dust is not the same density every wheres. Look at dust clouds so thick light cannot go through. Im sure in other parts the density could be almost 0%. It would make sense if it affected light from light years away.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)