NewsAlert: Physicists Gain Insights Into New State of Matter
Enceladus's "Tiger Stripes" --Are They a Possible Life Zone Hotspot?

The Earth Before Oxygen --Bacteria Thrived




Microfossils found in Australia show that more than 3.4 billion years ago, bacteria  that fed on sulphur compounds to survive, thrived on an Earth that had no oxygen --a finding that boosts hopes life has existed on Mars and elsewhere, according to a 2011 study by researchers from the University of Western Australia and Oxford University.

The team said the remains of microbes, located in ancient sedimentary rocks that have triggered debate for nearly a decade, have been confirmed as the earliest fossils ever recorded.

The sample came from the remote Pilbara region of Western Australia, a site called Strelley Pool, where the microbes, after dying, had been finely preserved between quartz sand grains. Pilbara has some of the planet's oldest rock formations, set down in the so-called Archean Eon when the infant Earth was a primeval water world, with seas that were the temperature of a hot bath.

In 2002, another team of scientists, working in the same region just 35 kilometres (20 miles) away, said they had found bacteria fossils in the same formation. But the claim was disputed, with some experts saying that the tiny pockmarks were not the signatures of once-living organisms but the result of mineralization of the rocks.

Drawing on the latest electron microscopy and spectroscopy techniques, the authors of the new study say they have triple proof that their sample is biological in origin.The marks measure only about 10 millionths of a metre (0.0004 inches) long. Their shape and clustering are not only consistent with bacterial cells, say the scientists.

They also have minute crystals of pyrite, an iron-and-sulphur compound also known as fool's gold, which are a clear by-product of metabolising sulphur and sulphates, according to their argument.
The team, led by David Wacey of the University of Western Australia, report the finding in the journal Nature Geoscience.

"At last we have good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago. It confirms there were bacteria at this time, living without oxygen," Martin Brasier, a professor at Oxford University, said in a press release.
Sulphur-loving bacteria "are still common today", added Brasier. 

The image top of page shows a 3D reconstruction of a 3.4 billion-year-old microfossil about 10 micrometers in diameter from Western Australia (L). Cross sections through the reconstruction (R) emphasize the spheroidal nature of this ancient cell. According to a study published in "Nature Geoscience", microfossils were discovered in a 3.4 billion-year-old sandstone at the base of of Strelley Pool in western Australia.



The Daily Galaxy via AFP and

Image credit: With thanks to Hugo Machado, Portugal

View Today's Hot Tech News Video from IDG -Publishers of PC World, MacWorld, and Computerworld--Top Right of Page  

To launch the video click on the Start Arrow. Our thanks for your support! It allows us to bring you the news daily about the discoveries, people and events changing our planet and our knowledge of the Universe.




Two comments: 1. we should look for extrasolar planets with these early "hot bath conditions" and look at how bacteria eat sulfer. The sulfer to oxygen conversion should be reviewed to see how "integration" played out for 3.4 billion years. 2. can DNA study be done on this bacteria? to find out how it has survived for a billion years? Maybe a process like that can be integrated into humans to extend our lives? Thoughts?

workout increase body contests build 2004 synthol rate studies close pioneer style bodybuilder level actor muscles century 2009 building competitive.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)