"Is Our Solar System in a Region of the Universe 'Just Right' for Life?"
Image of the Day: Spectacular Star Cluster at Milky Way Center

New NASA Discovery: "Alien Life can Use Many Types of Light-Producing Stars to Survive"



New NASA research has just answered a huge question: will alien photosynthesis use the same pigment--the same wavelength of light-- as on Earth? 

Everyone knows that we as humans literally owe the air we breathe to the greenery around us. As school children we learned that plants (as well as algae and cyanobacteria) perform the all important biological "magic trick" known as photosynthesis, which helps generate the atmospheric oxygen we use in every breath.

Plants, algae and cyanobacteria alter our planet in a way that only life can: they use photosynthesis to completely change the composition of the Earth's atmosphere. Since the days when dust devils on Mars were suspected to be the seasonal variation of vegetation, photosynthesis has been considered a key to identifying the presence of life on other planets. 

Both atmospheric oxygen (in the presence of liquid water) and the reflectance spectrum of plant leaves produce signs of life — dubbed "biosignatures" — that can be seen from space. Therefore, photosynthetic biosignatures are a priority in the search for life on planets in distant solar systems. 

The process of photosynthesis is obviously more than simple magic. In basic terms, photosynthetic organisms take in CO2, water (H2O) and light energy to produce sugars (in other words, the food that makes plants a staple of our diet). During this process, photosynthetic organisms use a photopigment called chlorophyll a (Chl a) to split water molecules and produce oxygen.

Until recently, scientists thought Chl a was the only photopigment used in oxygenic photosynthesis. Chl a uses photons in visible light at wavelengths of 400-700 nm.

"It was assumed that, due to the stringent energy requirements for splitting water molecules, longer wavelengths of light (which have lower energy) could not be used for oxygenic photosynthesis," said NASA's Steve Mielke, lead author of a new study.

That assumption changed in 1996 when Hideaki Miyashita and colleagues discovered a cyanobacterium named Acaryochloris marina that uses chlorophyll d (Chl d) instead of Chl a to perform oxygenic photosynthesis with photons from visible light through to wavelengths up to 740 nm in the near-infrared (NIR).

This discovery raised many questions about the wavelengths of light required for photosynthesis. Scientists wondered how difficult it was for A. marina to power biochemical reactions with low energy photons. It survives in environments where there is little visible light, because it gets the photons left over by Chl a organisms.

However, could A. marina be regularly unsuccessful in using the longer wavelength photons, and could its ability to use NIR be inefficient, at the edge of what the molecular mechanisms of oxygenic photosynthesis are able to handle? Or could these unique organisms actually thrive on low-energy photons?

New research has shown that A. marina doesn't struggle at all when living on low-energy photons. In fact, the cyanobacteria is just as efficient or more so in storing energy as organisms that rely on Chl a for photosynthesis.

Mielke and collaborators used a technique called pulsed time-resolved photo-acoustics (PTRPA) to compare the photosynthetic abilities of A. marina to a Chl a cyanobacterium named Synechococcus leopoliensis. PTRPA involves laser pulses at controlled wavelengths and allowed the team to measure the efficiency of photon energy storage (energy stored vs. energy input) of cyanobacterial cells.

When testing Chl d and Chl a at the wavelengths they each need to split water molecules, the team showed that whole-cell energy storage in A. marina was just as — and sometimes more — efficient than the S. leopoliensis cells using Chl a. For the first time, the team showed that oxygenic photosynthesis can operate well at longer wavelengths!

This discovery makes A. marina and Chl d very interesting for scientists that are trying to find life on extrasolar planets that orbit stars beyond our solar system.

Nancy Kiang of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) explains, "Chl d extends the useful solar radiation for oxygenic photosynthesis by 18% — meaning life can use more wavelengths of light (i.e. more types of light-producing stars) to survive. This implies a lot of cool things."

Kiang emphasizes the implications that the findings could have in the search for life on extrasolar planets - and the future of life here on Earth:

1) "Planets orbiting red dwarf stars may not get much visible light, but they'll get a lot of NIR light. So, now we know it would still make sense to look for oxygenic photosynthesis on such planets, and we could look for pigment signatures in the NIR."

2) "A. marina appears to be a late evolution, occupying a light niche that is produced by leftover photons from Chl a organisms. Since it can use more solar radiation than Chl a organisms, might our planet evolve to have Chl d outcompete Chl a?"

3) "Biomimicry of photosynthesis continues to be a quest in the development of renewable energy, but no one has yet developed an artificial system as good as nature to split water. For renewable energy that depends on sunlight, do the lower energy photons used with Chl d mean that we don't need such strong artificial catalysts for producing hydrogen fuel and biofuels?"

The findings could completely change our understanding of a biological reaction that is essential to the modern biosphere of Earth. They may also open new doors for the future of humankind in areas like renewable energy. But for NASA, the study could also have implications for the future of life on Earth — and beyond — that are truly far out.

The image below shows a plot of incident spectral radiation and whole cell in vivo absorbance. The yellow curve is the solar irradiance of the Sun at Earth's surface (Lean and Rind, 1998); brown is the irradiance of Gliese 581 (an M star) at habitable zone distance; red is the normalized absorbance of A. marina (D. Mauzerall); black is the normalized absorbance of Synechococcus (D. Mauzerall); and purple is the incident irradiance (%) in an A. marina environment (Larkum and Kühl, 2005).



The Daily Galaxy via http://www.giss.nasa.gov

Image credit: A red dwarf star, type M near a spiral galaxy. Photo:Sloan Digital Sky Survey, sdss3.org


This opens all kinds of possibilities for life on that water planet discovered recently, and possibly also for humanity's evolution in an underwater species. If the ancestors of dolphins could do it, perhaps we could as well. Heck! Maybe if we think of the oceans as our future homes, we will take better care of them. We could start researching human adaptability to underwater life right now, starting with how we could adapt to a food chain built on Chl d. At the rate we're going, I'm not sure that our planet will have time to naturally evolve that way but we could certainly help it along to ensure ourselves a workable habitat if life on the surface becomes too difficult, or impossible. This is not science fiction, either. What IS science fiction is that we can keep rolling along the way we are for much longer. Frankly, I'd rather grow gills than be half robotic.

Humans had best adapt our thinking about and to accept differences if we expect to meet ET’s and adapt to the reality of other life in the universe. There ARE other biochemistries, other colors and textures of “skin” and other means of vision, tasting, smelling, etc. ET will likely have to wear “space suits” to walk on our planet, they will likely find it impossible to eat our plants and animals (if they “eat”), and even if they originate from other so-called “Goldilocks” zones they will not be likely to survive unprotected (nakedly walking around) in earth’s atmosphere.

¿what about Near UV light or another pigments differents from Chl??

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)