Neutrinos Faster than Light? --"No, They Don't Break the Universe's Speed Limit" --CERN
Follow the Daily Galaxy
Add Daily Galaxy to igoogle page AddThis Feed Button Join The Daily Galaxy Group on Facebook Follow The Daily Galaxy Group on twitter
 

« "14-Billion Year Life-Span!" --New Nuclear Clock Proposed | Main | Planck-Mass Mirrors Provide New Way to Probe Predictions of Quantum Gravity »

March 19, 2012

Neutrinos Faster than Light? --"No, They Don't Break the Universe's Speed Limit" --CERN

 

           Tscan-pic-06-acs

 

Neutrinos do not go faster than light, according to new measurements made by an experiment called ICARUS at the Gran Sasso Laboratory using a new measuring technique, called a liquid argon time projection chamber and working independently from the OPERA scientists who had made the tentative but extremely controversial claim about "faster-than-light" particles. Particles that travel faster than light would unravel Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity, a cornerstone of modern physics.

The new measurements were Their findings "indicate the neutrinos do not exceed the speed of light," the European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) said, ading that there may have been technical hitches that had skewed the initial measurements, something that skeptics of the findings said they had always suspected.

The controversy began last September, when CERN's so-called OPERA team cautiously announced that sub-atomic particles called neutrinos had travelled some six kilometres (nearly four ) per second faster than the velocity of light, described by Einstein as the maximum speed in the cosmos.

The neutrinos were timed at their departure from CERN's giant underground lab near Geneva and again, after travelling 732 km (454 miles) through the Earth's crust, at their arrival at the Gran Sasso Laboratory in Italy.

To complete the trip, the neutrinos should have taken 0.0024 seconds. Instead, the particles were recorded as hitting the detectors in Italy 0.00000006 seconds sooner than expected.Knowing their findings would create a global controversy, the OPERA team urged other physicists to carry out their own checks to corroborate or refute what had been seen.

"ICARUS measures the neutrino's velocity to be no faster than the speed of light," said Carlo Rubbia, a Nobel winner and spokesperson for the ICARUS project.."Whatever the result, the OPERA experiment has behaved with perfect scientific integrity in opening their measurement to broad scrutiny and inviting independent measurements. This is how science works," said CERN Research Director Sergio Bertolucci, who added that further verifications were being made, including new experiments with particle beams in May, "to give us the final verdict."

In February, CERN said that the OPERA team were verifying a cable connection and a timing instrument called an oscillator that may have flawed measurements of the neutrinos' flight time.Strengthening this scenario, Bertolucci said on Friday "the evidence is beginning to point towards the OPERA result being an artifact of the measurement."

The Daily Gaaalaxy via CERN and AFP

View Today's Hot Tech News on Twitter & NASA's Robotic Glove --Top Right from IDG 

To launch the video click on the Start Arrow. Our thanks for your support! It allows us to bring you the news daily about the discoveries, people and events changing our planet and our knowledge of the Universe.

 

 

Comments

Color me not in the least surprised. On the face of it, one doubted the original report. It was rather difficult to imagine that the universe would allow only one exception to the speed of light rule, and that would be for something that went, what was it, six billionths of a second faster over the distance? That just SOUNDS more like a measurement error than a new discovery.

If we dont believe there is even a chance, then even when we see it we will think it is a mistake or a numbers error and make it go away missing the truth of what we saw.
I still have a hard time believing that gravity from a black hole can stop light from escaping, but a massive wall of galaxys cant make light speed up as it gets closer or slow down as it is going away. I also kind of wonder if its possible that in the same way we cant see light above and below certain wave lengths, light going faster or slower might not be visible/detectible to us or our instruments. But first I guess you need to believe light could go faster and slower.


Post a comment

« "14-Billion Year Life-Span!" --New Nuclear Clock Proposed | Main | Planck-Mass Mirrors Provide New Way to Probe Predictions of Quantum Gravity »




1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8





9


11


12


13


14


15

Our Partners

technology partners

A


19


B

About Us/Privacy Policy

For more information on The Daily Galaxy and to contact us please visit this page.



E