Image of the Day: Sunset on the Alien Planet Osiris HD209458b
The amazing image above of a sunset on exo-planet HD209458b 150 light years away, was reconstructed by Frederic Pont of the University of Exeter using data from a camera onboard the Hubble Space Telescope. Pont used his knowledge of how the color of light changes based on chemicals it encounters, and computer modeling, to create an actual image of what a sunset on the actual planet would look like. He’s posted it on his blog.
The light from Osiris’s star is white, like our own sun, but when it passes through the sodium in Osirisi’s atmosphere, red light in it is absorbed, leaving the starlight to appear blue. But as the sun sets, the blue light is scattered in the same way as it is here on Earth (Rayleigh scattering) causing a gradual change to green, and then to a dim dark green. And finally, due to diffraction, the bottom of the image becomes slightly flattened.
The Daily Galaxy via Hubble/ESA and Frederic Pont
Comments
« "Comment of the Day" --Russia's Failed Probe of Mars' Moon, Phobos | Main | Extreme Stars Found Thriving in Galaxies "Death Zones" »

Very nice image -- worthy of the "Image of the Day" title -- and well-written accompanying article (despite a minor punctuation glitch, and who isn't guilty of that every so often?).
And it's about time we started to get some better names for exoplanets than just alphanumerics. "Osiris" is so much easier for laymen (such as myself) to deal with than "HD209458b."
Posted by: Bob Greenwade | January 11, 2012 at 09:30 AM
There can be no "sunsets" on alien planets. I'm sure you meant starsets.
Posted by: MAC | January 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM
"Sun" can be defined as the host star of a particular planet, so it's "sunset"
Posted by: gd gal | January 11, 2012 at 12:23 PM
With an estimated 160 billion exoplanets in our galaxy alone (see preceding article), we'd soon run out of ordinary-language names; I'm afraid alphanumerics will have to do for most of them.
Posted by: Rev. Carl Bowers | January 12, 2012 at 05:35 AM
The flattening of the bottom of the setting sun is due to refraction, not diffraction.
Posted by: Fred | January 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Fred
Maybe on that planet they say diffraction for refraction?
Posted by: smartypants | January 12, 2012 at 03:41 PM
Either way we will never develop technology to travel to other stars if we dont stop spending money on welfare and wars. We need to have a similar operation like the manhatten project during ww2. House all our top scientists to develop new engines for space craft.
Posted by: Brandon lea | January 12, 2012 at 04:57 PM
about "sun".
Yeah sun is a general term as MAC says. Our sun is named "Sol". The name might change from culture to culture, but I believe it is acknowledged in the scientific community that the name is "Sol" (from Latin). Wiki supports me btw...
Posted by: Nightdog | January 13, 2012 at 03:35 PM
*pats Nightdog on the head*
Posted by: exoplanet HD209458b, Osiris | January 13, 2012 at 04:27 PM