Four Minutes After the Big Bang! Virgin Clouds of the Universe's Primordial Gas Discovered
Astronomers have found pristine clouds of the primordial gas that formed in the first few minutes after the Big Bang. The composition of the gas matches theoretical predictions, providing direct evidence in support of the modern cosmological explanation for the origins of elements in the universe.
Only the lightest elements, mostly hydrogen and helium, were created in the Big Bang. Then a few hundred million years passed before clumps of this primordial gas condensed to form the first stars, where heavier elements were forged.
Until now, astronomers have always detected "metals" (their term for all elements heavier than hydrogen and helium) wherever they have looked in the universe.
"As hard as we've tried to find pristine material in the universe, we have failed until now. This is the first time we've observed pristine gas uncontaminated by heavier elements from stars," said J. Xavier Prochaska, professor of astronomy and astrophysics at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
The researchers discovered the two clouds of pristine gas by analyzing the light from distant quasars, using the HIRES spectrometer on the Keck I Telescope at the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii. By spreading out the bright light from a quasar into a spectrum of different wavelengths, the researchers can see which wavelengths were absorbed by material in between the quasar and the telescope.
"We can see absorption lines in the spectrum where the light was absorbed by the gas, and that allows us to measure the composition of the gas," Fumagalli said.
Every element has a unique fingerprint that shows up as dark lines in the spectrum. In the spectra from the gas clouds, the researchers saw only hydrogen and its heavy isotope deuterium, Prochaska said. "We don't have any sensitivity to helium, but we would expect to see it if we did," he noted. "We do have excellent sensitivity for carbon, oxygen, and silicon, and these elements are completely absent."
Prior to this discovery, the lowest measurements of metal abundance in the universe were about one-thousandth the "metallicity" of the sun. "People had thought there was a 'floor' to metallicity, that nothing could be less than one-thousandth the solar enrichment. That's because the metals produced in galaxies were so widely dispersed in the universe," Fumagalli said. "So this was unexpected. It challenges our ideas about how metals are dispersed from the stars that produce them."
The researchers estimated a metallicity for the pristine gas of about one-ten-thousandth that of the sun. At the other extreme, stars and gas with the highest metallicities are almost ten times as enriched as the sun. "The metal abundance in different pockets of the universe covers a tremendous range," Prochaska said. "So these findings place ßnew constraints on our understanding of how metals are distributed throughout the universe."
Powerful telescopes see distant objects as they were far back in time, due to the time it takes light to travel across the universe. The spectrographic analysis of the pristine gas clouds places them in time at about 2 billion years after the Big Bang, or nearly 12 billion years ago. At that time, theoretical models predict that galaxies were growing by pulling in vast streams of cold gas, but these "cold flows" have never been seen.
According to Fumagalli, the pristine gas clouds are potential candidates for these elusive cold flows. Further studies are needed, however, to see if the newly discovered gas clouds are associated with galaxies.
The Daily Galaxy via University of California - Santa Cruz
Comments
« Image of the Day: Tharsis Tholus --Mar's Spectacular 4 Billion-Year-Old Volcano | Main | Universe had Swarms of Mini Galaxies Bursting with Star Creation 9 Billion Years Ago »

Can we expect to see the Big Bang itself by looking farther and far back in time or approximately near the same place in some time in the future!!?
Posted by: Dayanand Sutar | November 11, 2011 at 04:12 PM
Cookies are made in a wide variety of styles, using an array of ingredients including sugars, spices, chocolate, butter, peanut butter, nuts or dried fruits. The softness of the cookie may depend on how long it is baked.
Posted by: Niche Blog Review Service | November 11, 2011 at 10:17 PM
INDICATIONS THAT CONTRADICTS THE BIG BANG
Quote: "The metal abundance in different pockets of the universe covers a tremendous range," Prochaska said. "So these findings place new constraints on our understanding of how metals are distributed throughout the universe."
AD: Finding these uneven distributions of gasses and “metallic” elements, it is more likely that it (of course) is the Big Bang hypothesis itself that is wrong, suggesting a homogeneous “linear”/radiant elementary distribution and formation processes from an elusive and illogical singularity point that cannot exist in the real world.
Posted by: Ivar Nielsen | November 12, 2011 at 01:42 AM
Ok, what's with 4 minutes in headline, when it clearly states, near the end of the article quote about 2 billion years after the Big Bang, or nearly 12 billion years ago. At that time, theoretical models predict that galaxies were growing by pulling in vast streams of cold gas, but these "cold flows" have never been seen. /end quote What the bloody hell?
Posted by: Rogi Equality Riverstone | November 12, 2011 at 07:45 PM
That looks like its gonna be really good dude. I mean like WOW.
www.total-anon.at.tc
Posted by: DaxVoo | November 13, 2011 at 12:51 PM
The title doesn't make sense itself, since the Universe had to cool for several hundred thousand years before the first atoms could even form. Seriously, what the hell is with the title?
Posted by: moo | November 13, 2011 at 07:32 PM
Can you generate some content articles for me. The scribbling method is truly outstanding.
Posted by: Jadan | November 13, 2011 at 08:37 PM
You have aptly utilized the power of language. Fantastic post.
Posted by: Jadan | November 14, 2011 at 11:03 PM
This article is really helpful and insightful. I love it and hope to read more from you again.
Posted by: wedding gowns | November 19, 2011 at 07:43 PM
That has to be worst written article I have ever read. The information was cool (If I understood it). But it looked like intellectually delayed middle school student wrote it.
Posted by: coach outlet | November 29, 2011 at 10:53 PM
Don't be a show-off. Even Bluetooth headset users still get pegged for trying to be lofty when communicating hands free in a shopping aisle, when they could use their phone in the usual way like everybody else.
Posted by: Fall winter 2012 | December 04, 2011 at 07:50 PM
THAT IS ACTUALLY A HUMAN BODY...CHECK OUT THE HEAD AND FEET.
IN BETWEEN ALL THAT YOU WILL SEE A HUMAN FORM INSIDE ALL OF THE ENERGY THAT IT IS RELEASING..IF IT IS A SOLAR IMAGE YOU MUST BE LOOKING AT GOD. TRUTH BE TOLD THIS IMAGE IS AN INFRARED IMAGE OF A HUMAN WHO HAS BE EXPOSED TO LOW DOSES OF HELIUM AND HYDROGEN AND THE BODY DNA STRUCTURE AS IT RELEASES THE SAME ELEMENTS THAT THE UNIVERSE RELEASE...THAT'S WHY THE BIBLE SAY WE ARE CREATED IN HIS IMAGE.
Posted by: king beavers | December 11, 2011 at 09:32 AM
You got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about an hour. Thanks...
Posted by: Seo forum india | February 07, 2012 at 10:48 PM