"Do the Fundamental Constants of the Universe Vary?" --Science is Zeroing In on the Answer
Quantum logic is quite a new and absolutely fascinating field of physics and might - ultimately - lead to the fabrication of a quantum computer. And it could also aid the search for the "theory of everything" - the missing link between traditional physics and quantum physics. One of the fundamental questions of 21st-century physics is whether fundamental constants possibly vary.
Physicists from the QUEST Institute at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) and from the Leibniz University of Hanover have come one decisive step closer to this goal: instead of complex laser arrangements, all they need is one single laser source to bring a single magnesium ion to a complete standstill. Then they use this ion to determine the properties of another ion. The new method has been published in the specialised journal Applied Physics B.
The new research results constitute another step towards the conclusion of a scientific dispute, namely the question as to who can provide better measurement results to compare astronomic measured data with laboratory references. In astronomic investigations, light is analysed which is generated by quasars and has traversed all kinds of elements, e.g. in cosmic dusts, on its way down to the Earth. The individual components can be identified via the spectral lines of the quasar light. If these spectra differ from those that researchers have determined in the laboratory for the same elements, this possibly suggests that the fine-structure constant has changed. These reference comparisons have yielded contradictory results. In order to clarify these contradictions, different systematic aspects have to be investigated. One of the fundamental aspects hereby is the accuracy rate of the known laboratory spectra. The complex internal structure of atoms and ions, which leave a characteristic trace in the quasar light, make it difficult for traditional spectroscopic procedures to tackle them.
The scientists from QUEST (Centre for Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research) have conceived a clever ruse to detect elements such as, e.g., iron or titanium ions which are difficult to measure directly. These ions can be coupled with other ions of the same charge, by mutual repulsion of the charged particles.
Together, the two partners form a quantum-mechanical system in which one of the partners can be manipulated and measured and, thus, provides information about the other partner. In this case, the first partner, the so-called "logic ion", is a magnesium ion. It is somehow used as a "sensor" for the "spectroscopy ion" to be investigated, which can be, e.g., ion, titanium or calcium.
To this end, the magnesium ion first has to be cooled by means of laser light. Hereby, so much energy is subducted from it that it no longer moves. Then, the researchers can excite specific atomic transitions inside the "spectroscopy ion" - i.e. they can basically cause electrons to move to another energy level. This, in turn, provokes a recoil kick which sets both ions into motion and can be detected very sensitively on the "logic ion".
The first step of the laser cooling procedure has become much easier now. Usually, complicated systems involving several laser sources, which fill large optical tables, are used for the purposes of cooling. This group of scientists has developed a novel and, comparably, compact laser system which only needs a single source.
To this end, the frequency of light emitted by a fibre laser is multiplied with the aid of non-linear crystals up to a wavelength of 280 nm. An opto-electronic modulator generates a sideband on the light which is resonant with a transition in the magnesium ion and is used for the state preparation and laser cooling of the ions.
"With this arrangement, we have succeeded in cooling a single magnesium ion in a Paul trap down to the ground state of a longitudinal mode", explains Piet Schmidt, Head of the QUEST Institute at PTB. "In a next step, we want to test this cooling scheme for an ionic crystal consisting of a magnesium ion and a calcium ion and then, in yet another step, a frequency comb will be used as a spectroscopic laser."
If this works out, laboratory precision measurements of elements such as titanium or iron (including their isotope shifts) might come within reach. This would contribute to clarifying the question of whether the fine-structure constant possibly varies.
The Daily Galaxy via http://www.ptb.de
Comments
« Hidden Galaxies of the Observable Universe (Today's Most Popular) | Main | The Bolshoi Simulation: Reveals Evolution of the Large-Scale Structure of the Universe & Dark Matter Halos »

Sounds like an ingenious idea. Giving practical shape will involve some measurement. The instruments always have intrinsic errors. Besides the probalistic nature of processes adds statistics and then the experimentor thinks about all the factors that may limit or fault the measurement. Thus, one may improve upon intelligent calculative skills with Quantum Computers but some of the faults mentioned will always set limits. Can we have any physical process that removes the element of chance from the scene. What about ' consciousness ' as a parameter! Artificial Intelligence scientists are working on it. So where do we stand, we get better and better but only in a relative manner. Absoluteness continues to lie in the domain of human spirit. Mastering it may help understand consciousness better.
Posted by: Narendra Nath | September 30, 2011 at 05:43 PM
it would be nice if this site would do something besides copying and pasting (STEALING) text from other sites. Absolute garbage.
Posted by: alan | September 30, 2011 at 09:40 PM
it would be nice if this site would do something besides copying and pasting (STEALING) text from other sites. Absolute garbage.
Posted by: alan | September 30, 2011 at 09:40 PM
Great positivity, Allen. Keep up your habits of stealing if you are so fond of it. None can claim originality as we all get affected by what others teach us, what we learn ourselves the hard way and our success and failure stories. We are all the same but we do not reflect on the same! Negativity is easy come but better avoided if we want to work with a calm and disciplined mind. That may lead to innovation and originality!
Posted by: Narendra Nath | October 01, 2011 at 03:01 AM
If you don't like this site, why do you keep coming?
Just enjoy the fucking service, ungrateful brats.
Posted by: insomnia | October 01, 2011 at 12:54 PM
We can with confidence drop the angst about contacting aliens, how to do that,if it is wise,and all of the rest of the deli-thin sliced minutae.
Our elementary curiosity,and the resulting experiments which we continue to under-take,are in themselves ample communication.
Whether recieved by any,or if so,considered significant might be more important,than we imagine.
One more thought,spelling errors in the URL,do not boost my confidence in the site.
And another,I don't mind that this site "borrows from others",however it's increasingly obvious that it needs to take more time discerning significant articles,and efficiently editing,rather than chopping into small pieces,for more releases; that's not "making science accesible".
It's kind of like some arbitrary combination of word count, and sylabic measure,are applied at a certain percentage rate.
Difficult bits are left untouched,(probably not efficient?).
Oh well,maybe the most I can hope for is correct spelling in the URL?
Posted by: Fred Krammer | October 01, 2011 at 05:40 PM
......... Yes, that's right, it's spelled ACCESSIBLE, go ahead, make fun of an old autistic man . . . . but what about the rest of my comment?
Posted by: Fred Krammer | October 01, 2011 at 06:01 PM
insomnia to narendra nath..... not accustomed to use of foul language, back to insomnia fully reflected from narendra nath. please deal with subject. i have published a mss ' Inconstancy of the Physical Constants and Strength of Foce/Fields'. You care to read,Mr. Insomnia!
Posted by: Narendra Nath | October 03, 2011 at 03:32 AM
what a nice blog!look forward your writing next!
Posted by: Wholesale NHL jerseys | November 10, 2011 at 06:16 PM