"Earth Pop.1000 to Outer Space": A Single Genome Reveals Entire Span of Human History
Stored inside your genome are clues to the history of humankind, including global migrations and population crashes. So say researchers who have analyzed DNA pioneer, Craig Venter's publicly published DNA sequence, and those of 6 others, to reveal major milestones in human history.
The analysis, published in Nature, suggests that descendants of the first humans to leave Africa shrunk to as few as 1,000 reproductively active individuals before rebounding. The study also suggests that, contrary to popular theories, these early humans continued to breed with sub-Saharan Africans until as recently as 20,000 years ago.
"Each little piece of the genome has its own unique bit of history and goes to a unique ancestor as you go further and further back," explained John Novembre, a population geneticist at the University of California, Los Angeles, to Nature.com. "As you look at different parts of the genome, you get access to different parts of history."
On the basis of this principle, Richard Durbin, a genome scientist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute near Cambridge, UK, and his then post-doc Heng Li determined a way to calculate, from the ages of different segments of a single person's genome, changes in the population size of their ancestors.
The genomes of Venter and two others of European ancestry, two Asian men and two West African men all tell the same story up until about 100,000 years ago, when their populations began to split and then plummet in size, reflecting, it is believed, the first human migrations out of Africa.
The ancestors of Asians and Europeans dwindled by a factor of ten to roughly 1,200 reproductively active people between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago, Durbin and Li calculate. African populations also crashed, but by nowhere near the same extent, dropping to around 5,700 breeding individuals. Other studies have recorded population crashes at around the same time, Reich says.
In a seperate analysis, Durbin and Li compared an X chromosome from an African with one from a non-African to determine when their ancestors stopped interbreeding after the first humans left Africa and colonized other parts of the world. Human remains and artefacts unearthed in Europe, Asia and Australia seem to suggest humans rapidly colonized these places by about 40,000 years ago, diminishing the opportunities to interbreed with Africans.
Durbin and Li suggest that these groups continued to interbreed until as recently as 20,000 years ago. One possible explanation, Durbin says, is that after the first humans left Africa some 60,000 years ago, successive waves of Africans followed suit, interbreeding with the ancestors of the earlier migrants.
Mining individual genomes can't reveal every chapter of human history, notes David Reich, who works with Li at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The approach reveals little about upheavals of the last 20,000 years, such as the peopling of the Americas, because few chunks of the genome are young enough. Similarly, Durbin and Li's method can't deduce the history of human ancestors who existed before about 2 million years ago because few regions of the genome are much older.
Reich, a geneticist and professor in the department of genetics at the Harvard Medical School. told nature.com that he plans to lean heavily on the new approach, not least for work on ancient genomes belonging to Neanderthal and a mysterious sister population, known as Denisovans, discovered through DNA recovered from a 30,000–50,000-year-old finger bone found in a Siberian cave. Reich and his colleagues have been unable to determine when Neanderthals and Denisovans stopped breeding with one another, and the new approach has the potential to answer that question.
The Daily Galaxy via nature.com/news
Comments
« Googols & Galaxies: The Ever Expanding Scale Of Human Understanding of the Universe | Main | News Flash: NASA Spacecraft to Enter Asteroid's Orbit Today »

Interesting story but please use correct grammar:
,"descendants of the first humans to leave Africa shrunk to as few as 1,000"
This should be "shrank", not "shrunk". Incorrect grammar and spelling damage the credibility of this site
Posted by: Alan | July 15, 2011 at 05:07 PM
OK these guys know what theye are talking about. Wow.
www.complete-privacy.us.tc
Posted by: WuxRoo | July 16, 2011 at 05:25 AM
OK these guys know what theye are talking about. Wow.
www.complete-privacy.us.tc
Posted by: WuxRoo | July 16, 2011 at 05:25 AM
OK these guys know what theye are talking about. Wow.
www.complete-privacy.us.tc
Posted by: WuxRoo | July 16, 2011 at 05:25 AM
OK these guys know what theye are talking about. Wow.
www.complete-privacy.us.tc
Posted by: WuxRoo | July 16, 2011 at 05:25 AM
''all humans can trace their maternal lineage back to one mitochondrial Eve who lived in Africa around 200,000 years ago.''
Good thing we prevented the birth of the ultimate being!
Posted by: Kunihiko Maeda | July 16, 2011 at 06:39 AM
African populations also crashed, but by nowhere near the same extent, dropping to around 5,700 breeding individuals.
Posted by: Max Furniture | July 16, 2011 at 10:27 AM
Alan, with all due respect, you are a douche =)
Posted by: FUKI FUKI YU | July 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM
what about the theory of two fertile cresents, and the americas were populated with houndreds of thousands of people before the globe was circum-navigated?
Posted by: chokdong | July 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM
@FUKI FUKI YU Maybe, but it's true. A thorough proofread should catch mistakes like that.
Posted by: Tyler | July 16, 2011 at 05:03 PM
Fascinating Article. Isn't it interesting how it had taken thousands of years for different races to form, yet as technology increases, it may take a few hundred for a World race to reappear...
www.NorthJerseyPads.com
Posted by: Mike Kaplan | July 16, 2011 at 09:28 PM
Rather than having been reduced to 1200 reproductively active individuals, perhaps several groups of humans at a later time were snuffed out by misfortunes. This could effectively make it appear that a fewer number had existed during that bottledneck at an earlier time. TR
Posted by: TimothyR | July 16, 2011 at 11:11 PM
Another hoax based an liberal scientist propaganda and facts in a satanic attempt to discredit Jesus! *
Posted by: Isabella | July 17, 2011 at 10:55 PM
@TimothyR
Because this completely discredits Jesus. Which part was that again?
Posted by: @TimothyR | July 20, 2011 at 04:13 AM
Fascinating Article.
Posted by: Cheap UGGs Boots | September 07, 2011 at 08:38 PM
Thanks... good luck to you.
Posted by: hermes bags | September 16, 2011 at 07:51 PM
I enjoyed reading this kind of stuff. Thanks for sharing such an excellent information
Posted by: Wholesale jerseys | November 10, 2011 at 06:03 PM
The blog is very useful. I love the article. Keep updating. Thank you very much.
Posted by: Adidas Porsche Design | December 28, 2011 at 08:11 AM