Stephen Hawking on Non-Carbon-Based Alien Life
At the 50th anniversary celebration of NASA on October 1, 2008, Stephen Hawking, then Newton's heir as the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, was asked the question, “Are we alone?” His answer was short and simple: "probably not."
Hawking outlined three possibilities: One, that there is no life out there; and two, somewhat pessimistically, that when intelligent life gets smart enough to send signals into space, it is also busying itself with stockpiling nuclear bombs.
What we normally think of as 'life' is based on chains of carbon atoms, with a few other atoms, such as nitrogen or phosphorous, Hawking observed in his lecture, Life in the Universe. We can imagine that one might have life with some other chemical basis, such as silicon, "but carbon seems the most favorable case, because it has the richest chemistry."
The Earth was formed largely out of the heavier elements, including carbon and oxygen. Somehow, Hawking observes, "some of these atoms came to be arranged in the form of molecules of DNA. One possibility is that the formation of something like DNA, which could reproduce itself, is extremely unlikely. However, in a universe with a very large, or infinite, number of stars, one would expect it to occur in a few stellar systems, but they would be very widely separated."
Other prominent scientists have warned that we humans may be blinded by our familiarity with carbon and Earth-like conditions. In other words, what we’re looking for may not even lie in our version of a “sweet spot”. After all, even here on Earth, one species' “sweet spot” is another species' worst nightmare. In any case, it is not beyond the realm of feasibility that our first encounter with extraterrestrial life will not be a solely carbon-based fete.
Alternative biochemists speculate that there are several atoms and solvents that could potentially spawn life. Because carbon has worked for the conditions on Earth, we speculate that the same must be true throughout the Universe. In reality, there are many elements that could potentially do the trick. Even counter-intuitive elements such as arsenic may be capable of supporting life under the right conditions. Even on Earth some marine algae incorporate arsenic into complex organic molecules such as arsenosugars and arsenobetaines.
Several other small life forms use arsenic to generate energy and facilitate growth. Chlorine and sulfur are also possible elemental replacements for carbon. Sulfur is capable of forming long-chain molecules like carbon. Some terrestrial bacteria have already been discovered to survive on sulfur rather than oxygen, by reducing sulfur to hydrogen sulfide.
Nitrogen and phosphorus could also potentially form biochemical molecules. Phosphorus is similar to carbon in that it can form long chain molecules on its own, which would conceivably allow for formation of complex macromolecules. When combined with nitrogen, it can create quite a wide range of molecules, including rings.
So what about water? Isn’t at least water essential to life?
Not necessarily. Ammonia, for example, has many of the same properties as water. An ammonia or ammonia-water mixture stays liquid at much colder temperatures than plain water. Such biochemistries may exist outside the conventional water-based "habitability zone". One example of such a location would be right here in our own solar system on Saturn's largest moon Titan.
Hydrogen fluoride methanol, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride, and formamide have all been suggested as suitable solvents that could theoretically support alternative biochemistry. All of these “water replacements” have pros and cons when considered in our terrestrial environment. What needs to be considered is that with a radically different environment, comes radically different reactions. Water and carbon might be the very last things capable of supporting life in some extreme planetary conditions.
NASA's recent controversial announcement of the discovery of the possibility of arsenic-based life in Mono Lake fits hand-in-glove with NASA's strategy to expand the search for life beyond Earth to extreme non-carbon-based life. No discovery that we can make in our exploration of the solar system would have greater impact on our view of our position in the cosmos, or be more inspiring, than the discovery of an alien life form, even a primitive microbial one.
The discovery over the past decade of extreme life forms thriving on Earth at the super-heated walls of Ocean volcanic vents and in the interior regions of the planet's crust, led to a seminal 2009 report, The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems, by the National Research Council (NRC). The NASA sponsored report recommended that the search for beyond Earth’s solar system should be widened throughout the Universe to include the possibility of “weird” life.
"Nothing," the report concludes, "would be more tragic in the American exploration of space than to encounter alien life and fail to recognize it.”
Earth did not accumulate oxygen during the first roughly 3 billion years, or form an ozone layer until about 1.5 billion years ago. There is considerable emphasis on looking for contemporary Earth atmospheres that have oxygen and an ozone layer, but, the report hits home, we should also be using models with different anaerobic microbial non-carbon ecosystems, atmospheres that might parallel the different stages in the evolution of Earth's atmospheres over 4 billion years, and conditions that could indicate the presence of a tectonically active planet.
The report pointed out that the exploration of the planet is concentrated on looking for places where liquid water exists -- which goes along with the idea of where life is found on the Earth. However, they emphasize that liquids such as ammonia, methane, and formamide could also be the building blocks for life.
Saturn's moon, Titan is a perfect candidate: the discovery of evidence of liquid water-ammonia on Titan provides the potential for life-bearing polar fluids outside what is normally regarded as the habitable zone.
The Daily Galaxy via rationalvedanta.net and physorg.com/news
Comments
« Saturn's Titan: "A Unique World in the Solar System" -- Could Life There be Methane Based? | Main | Dynamics of Earth's Core Linked to Movement of Tectonic Plates »

Excellent news. Otherwise nothing else could be expected from Stephen Hawkins. Reality, science, knowledge,philosophy, ideology and a superb sense of humanity.
Posted by: Antonio Bernardo colaco | May 18, 2011 at 02:57 AM
Re: "Watch out if you would meet an alien. You could be infected with a disease with which you have no resistance." - That's a naive statement - yes you would certainly have no resistance to a 'disease' that evolved extra-terrestrially, but you would also be almost certain to not even be susceptible to it in any way. Our own diseases are tailor-made for US and evolve with us through the aeons. Stephen Hawking should really not speak so publicly and authoritatively on this topic - stick to black holes Steve!
Posted by: Jake | May 18, 2011 at 08:02 AM
Were we ever to have direct contact with an alien race here on Earth, they would control the interaction. I stands to reason that worrying about what say, do, or broadcast would be entirely moot. If they wanted to interact they would, and if they wished to be our friends, they would be our friends.
But if they had other motives, we could not prevent those motives. Let's say for discussion their society had advanced by just 1000 years in technology (a very conservative estimate unless the light speed barrier is surmountable), they would be like gods to us. Remember, we have gone from the hand held calculator to an iPhone in just 40 years. Technology is exponential. And if this species caould travel through wormholes, I would guess we would also be at some disadvantage.
To your health,
Dr Z
www.anylabtestnow.co/drzforlife
Posted by: DrZforlife | May 18, 2011 at 08:09 AM
Like the one on your bum, eh Jake :)
Its just one amazing mans opinion homie!!!
Posted by: Payne-Apple-Express :) | May 18, 2011 at 08:13 AM
All right! More food for the BBQ! I wonder what formamide based life with a little chipotle glaze would be like?
Posted by: William Evans | May 18, 2011 at 09:11 AM
All right! More food for the BBQ! I wonder what formamide based life with a little chipotle glaze would be like?
Posted by: William Evans | May 18, 2011 at 09:11 AM
We should all put our hearing aids on (yes collectively) so we can listen properly! Bunch of old f*rts! Oh, it's raining now...
Posted by: john | May 18, 2011 at 09:38 AM
I find it pretty silly to speculate on something that we haven't a shread of information about. Any speculation could be 100% correct or 100% incorrect.... or fall on any point in between.
Q
Posted by: .Q. | May 18, 2011 at 10:23 AM
Mr. Hawking has again succeeded in shedding no more light on this subject than the rambling of the guy who stands on the end of my street spouting his own theories. He has become a bitter scientist who hedges his bets on everything, touts the wonders of this universe, but also claims to be very sure of what may, or will not according to him, happen to our consciousness once our bodies fail completely. Thanks Steve for telling us all the answers!! Oh wait... your ideas are just theories as well. Well, thanks anyway.
Posted by: P. Carlonis | May 18, 2011 at 01:33 PM
Man, you guys get bitchy in here. Anyway. If any alien life form is anything like us I would hate to meet them.
Posted by: Jamie | May 18, 2011 at 02:13 PM
People on here are bitchy because they all think they're scientists.
Y'know, the man is famous for a reason?
A deadly intelligent mind, and some whit to accompany it.
Posted by: Kyle Howard | May 18, 2011 at 03:05 PM
Hawking has lost his fucking mind...and he doesn't recognize the intelligence of animals or plants...if a bird can fly using wings, why would it build a plane?
Hawking is trolling...I ain't mad at him...
Posted by: tabali tigi | May 18, 2011 at 03:44 PM
Q above said: "I find it pretty silly to speculate on something that we haven't a shread of information about..."
Silly? Perhaps.
But I have to say that it sure is fun, and mind-stimulating, and awe-inspiring to imagine such possible scenarios as encountering a possible alien intelligence that operates on an entirely different chemistry and biology than we do!
(And history has shown, what the human mind can fantasize and imagine about, often comes to pass, and drives us to explore, and reach new goals.)
So I guess perhaps there is nothing too silly or wrong with a little bit of fun and healthy speculation bounded by the known laws of physics and chemistry.
So i say: speculate and live a little! At the very least, it will make you more fun at parties!
Posted by: Velocity Wave | May 18, 2011 at 09:09 PM
"Watch out if you would meet an alien. You could be infected with a disease with which you have no resistance." Hawking is not alone in this idea. Al Popoff even coined the term alienosis a few years ago. Alienoses are diseases communicable from extraterrestrial organisms — sentient beings, animals, plants, quasi-living creatures, or still unknown life forms. Humans are still alive because they aren't here: the extraterrestrials and their alien microbes. Popoff states that in the near future, humans should build up a reliable space defense system — a complex network of interacting humans, AI, sophisticated software, and machines, protecting our present habitat, the Solar System, from pathogens, quasi-alive forms, intelligent machines, machine swarms controlled by AI, and any alien life forms which could pose a threat to the terrestrial life or would dangerously change our environment. There is no other way the human race to survive.
Posted by: ET Gamer | May 18, 2011 at 11:21 PM
Legitimate human scientists are often content to observe other cultures and species while taking pains to avoid interfering with them. Intelligent off-planet visitors may be observing similar ethical (and hygienic) considerations.
Posted by: Skeptimist | June 04, 2012 at 12:16 PM
As far as we have come a whole planet, Most of us lack the ability to see subtly, meaning we have probably at least once come into contact with a non earth life form and not even known it. It has been proven that inorganic particles (such as dust) can form into coumpounds that mimic many of the signs of life, this only occurs when suspended in a plasma. From this alone, i think the human race is still far to ignorant of life beyond itself to identify such things.
Posted by: Donald B | October 09, 2012 at 10:21 AM