Image of the Day: Luminous Objects in Sagittarius Arm of the Milky Way
The Mystery of Spiral Galaxies -- Is their Structure an Illusion?

Distant Quasars Hint that Our Corner of the Universe is Fine-Tuned for Life (Today's Most Popular)


Precise measurements on the light from distant quasars suggest that the value of the fine-structure constant may have changed over the history of the Universe. If the quasar results are eventually confirmed, our concepts of space and time are sure to change our fundamental understanding of the Universe.

The fine-structure constant, or alpha, is the coupling constant for the electromagnetic force. If alpha were just 4% bigger or smaller than it is, stars wouldn't be able to make carbon and oxygen, which would have made it impossible for life as we know it in our Universe to exist.

A study has shown that alpha seems to have varied a tiny bit in different directions of the Universe billions of years ago, being slightly smaller in the northern hemisphere and slightly larger in the southern hemisphere. One intriguing implication is that the fine-structure constant is continuously varying in space, and seems fine-tuned for life in our neighborhood of the Universe.

The physicists, John Webb from the University of New South Wales and his coauthors, used data from two telescopes to uncover the spatial dependence of the fine-structure constant. Using the north-facing Keck telescope in Mauna Kea, Hawaii, and the south-facing Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Paranal, Chile, the researchers observed more than 100 quasars, which are extremely luminous and distant galaxies that are powered by massive black holes at their centers.

By combining the data from the two telescopes that look in opposite directions, the researchers found that, 10 billion years ago, alpha seems to have been larger by about one part in 100,000 in the southern direction and smaller by one part in 100,000 in the northern direction. The data for this “dipole” model of alpha has a statistical significance of about 4.1 sigma, meaning that that there is only a one in 15,000 chance that it is a random event.

Quasars are highly luminous objects that emit light over a wide range of wavelengths, with peaks at several wavelengths due to emission by elements such as hydrogen, nitrogen, silicon, carbon and iron in the gas around the quasar. When light from the quasar passes near a galaxy on itsway to Earth, the gas around the galaxy causes a distinct pattern of absorption lines in the quasar spectrum. By measuring the wavelengths of the absorption lines due to heavy elements we can determine both the redshift of the gas and the value of the fine-structure constant, alpha, at the time when the light from the quasar was absorbed. Such observations suggest that the value of alpha was slightly smaller billions of years ago.

Quasars are compact but highly luminous objects -- so luminous that they can be studied in intricate detail using ground-based telescopes despite being vast distances away from us. We think that quasars contain black holes at their centers and that the immense gravitational force exerted by the black hole is extremely efficient at converting matter in its vicinity into light.

Since quasars are found in all directions in the sky, they provide a powerful way of charting almost the entire Universe. Some quasars are so far away that we see them as they were billions of years ago. Indeed, by observing quasars scientists can chart a continuous “universal history” that starts when the Universe was only about one billion years old and continues up to the present day.

Scientists cannot study alpha with any reasonable precision using the quasars themselves. Rather, we must examine what happens when the radiation from a quasar passes through a galaxy that lies between the Earth and the quasar. The quasar emits light over a broad range of wavelengths. However, when this light passes through the gas around the galaxy, a characteristic pattern of absorption lines, or "bar code," will be superimposed on it.

The presence of an absorption line at a particular wavelength reveals that a specific element is present in the gas cloud, and the width of each line shows the quantity of the element that is present. In addition to hydrogen, which is ubiquitous in the Universe, these “bar codes” reveal that the gas clouds contain a range of other elements, including magnesium, iron, zinc, silicon, aluminium and chromium.

Moreover, the bar code reveals what was happening when the light passed through the cloud, which could have happened as long ago as just one billion years after the Big Bang. Although the gas cloud would have evolved into something quite different by today, its bar code provides us with a permanent imprint of its state in the distant past –- including information about the value of alpha at that time.

By comparing the bar codes found in quasar absorption spectra with the bar codes we measure for the same atoms and ions in the laboratory, Webb and team could find out if the physics responsible for the absorption of radiation by atoms has changed over the history of the universe. In other words, they can find out if alpha has changed.

Confirmation that alpha is changing would have profound implications for physics. For instance, the equivalence principle –- one of the cornerstones of relativity theory -– states that in freely falling reference frames, the outcome of any non-gravitational experiment is independent of when and where it is carried out. Changes in the value of alpha would constitute a violation of this principle.

The varying speed of light (VSL) theories, first proposed by John Moffat of the University of Toronto and developed in recent years by João Magueijo of Imperial College, John Barrow and others as an alternative to inflationary models in cosmology, could also lead to changes in the value of alpha in the early Universe. Inflation and VSL theories attempt to explain features of the universe –- such as its apparent flatness -– that cannot be explained by the Big Bang theory alone.

Casey Kazan via


I posted a comment 2 weeks aco under a SIMILAR that came to a similar conclusion. I said that other scientists believe this to be a mirage due to "cold dark lambda", BUT, I believe distant NORMAL GALAXIES WERE USED, INSTEAD OF QUASARS. Is this correct? if so, THIS study may shift the debate in favor of a variable fine structure constant.

Life as it exists in our corner of the universe is fine tuned to alpha value in our corner.

I hate the phrase "fine-tuned" because it implies some meaning, a purpose. At least to many. And I hate statistics about randomness. What does it mean "only one in 15, 000 chance..."? I don't see why that would exclude something being random?

I think Steven Weinberg explains well randomness of phenomena in the universe in his "A Designer Universe?"

And Lawrence Krauss explains some of the changes of laws of physics during history of the universe in "A Universe From Nothing". I think this would be a great addition to this research:

Just don't use the phrase "fine-tuning".

If it varies how is there any fine-tuning?

I agree, the phrase "fine tuning" is irrational, maybe the pope would speak like that. The fact that this shows up like a dipole tells me that this is giving us the relative speed and direction of this part of the galaxy.

Then they say :

"If alpha were just 4% bigger or smaller than it is, stars wouldn't be able to make carbon and oxygen, which would have made it impossible for life as we know it in our Universe to exist."

...that is a conclusion based on no knowledge about it !

The fine-structure constant is defined by the following constants: e^2/(2*c*eo*h)= 0,00792... so which constant IS the variable ? Physical laws are NOT variable, this is a hysterical idea... besides that, what do they know about this:

"If alpha were just 4% bigger or smaller than it is, stars wouldn't be able to make carbon and oxygen, which would have made it impossible for life as we know it in our Universe to exist." ...but stars could make all other elements ??

Did they make experiments ? No ! Making interesting but thoughtless headlines is not science !! It's journalistic and cold business to make people buy the rubbish written about it !
The objections above are interesting, but I'll go with the bonafide physicists, not with the Wikipedia University alumni.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)