Supermassive Black Holes Observed Devouring Entire Galaxies (Weekend Most Popular)

Black holes -Stephen Hawking's enigmatic "bad boys of the Universe"- have been discovered to have the ability to strip massive galaxies of the cool gases required to form new stars, leaving ageing red giants to fade out of existence with no stars to replace them.

The study, led by Asa Bluck of the University of Nottingham's School of Physics and Astronomy and a Fellow of the Royal Society, used images of unprecedented depth and resolution from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory to detect black holes in distant galaxies. Researchers looked for galaxies emitting high levels of radiation and x-rays — a classic signature of black holes devouring gas and dust through accretion, or attracting matter gravitationally., used images of unprecedented depth and resolution from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory to detect black holes in distant galaxies. Researchers looked for galaxies emitting high levels of radiation and x-rays — a classic signature of black holes devouring gas and dust through accretion, or attracting matter gravitationally.

Funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council and NASA, the research led to some startling results: in supermassive black holes this radiation can reach huge proportions, emitting X-ray radiation in far greater quantities then is emitted by the rest of the objects in the galaxy combined — meaning that the black hole ‘shines’ far brighter than the entire galaxy it lies at the heart of. In fact, the amount of energy released is sufficient to strip the galaxy of gas at least 25 times over.

Results have also shown that the vast majority of the X-ray radiation present in the universe is produced in these accretion discs surrounding supermassive black holes, with a small proportion produced by all other objects, including galaxies and neutron stars.

The accretions discs surrounding supermassive black holes produce so much energy that they heat up the cold gases lying at the heart of massive galaxies. The accretion disc shines across all wavelengths — from radio waves to gamma waves. This speeds up the random motions of the gas, making it rise in temperature and pushing it away from the galactic center, where it becomes less dense. Gas needs to be cold and dense to collapse under gravity to form new stars, this resulting hot, low-density material must cool down before gravity will take effect — a process which would take longer than the age of the universe to achieve.

Old stars are therefore left to die out with no new stars replacing them, leaving the galaxy to grow dark and die. And by pushing gas away from the galactic centre, the accretion disc starves the supermassive black hole of new material to devour, leading to its eventual demise.

“It’s thought that black holes form inside their host galaxies and grow in proportion to them, forming an accretion disc which will eventually destroy the host. In this sense they can be described as viral in nature,” said Asa Bluck. “Massive galaxies are in the minority in our visible universe — about one in a thousand galaxies is thought to be massive, but it may be much less. And at least a third of these have supermassive black holes at their centre. That’s why it’s so interesting that this type of black hole produces most of the X-ray light in the universe. They are the minority but they dominate energy output.”

Jason McManus via University of Nottingham

http://research.nottingham.ac.uk/NewsReviews/newsDisplay.aspx?id=664

Comments

[fred sopori]

Please proofread this.

It is an interesting article, but there is word processing detritus in it; a whole paragraph is repeated after the .,

Thanks.

[skankmasta C]

Isn't "black hole" a misnomer? A hole implies something with a finite volume. Michell's "Dark Star" is by far more apt. Personally, I prefer "terrifying blob of matter that sucks up everything in its path and emits deadly radiation".

Stephen Hawking must have been obsessing about other "black holes" in his more able, hormone-frenzied youth.

[Martin]

shankmasta C, stars and blobs have finite volume, whereas a singularity has no volume by definition. That's why neither "Dark Star", nor "blobs of matter" are adequate. On the other side, "hole" is more than adequate once you cast and visualize a spatial grid over the space-time continuum and - the singularity is deforming the grid into a worm-hole.

[Allan W Janssen]

I always thought of them as; 'Those sucky things!'

[voldemort]

i want a blackhole to suck my............................................................................................................................................................pencil

[Alex]

Does anyone know if there is a star large enough and close enough to us to wipe out our system?

[iphone cover]

great article. I totally understand this now!

[headphones]

You had some nice points here. I done a research on the topic and got most peoples will agree with your blog.

[MAN]

black holes do not grow in porportion to their galaxy. black holes actually drive the development of a galaxy. lol sorry im a lil late with this comment