Could Our Universe Have Been Born Inside a Black Hole -Radical New Theory Says"Yes"
EcoAlert: BP Gulf Well May Not Be Capped on Gov't Fears

Why Did Matter Prevail Over Dark Antimatter?

6a00d8341bf7f753ef01348387d209970c-500pi If matter and antimatter had come out even in those first moments, they would have instantly destroyed each other, leaving nothing but energy behind. There would be no galaxies, stars, planets, or skeptical Monday morning pundits reading this post.

The Tevatron particle smasher in Illinois has revealed a new clue to the mystery. In a study for Physical Review D, physicist Dmitri Denisov and his colleagues showed that in long-running proton-antiproton collisions (nearly 8 years of them): “While colliding protons and antiprotons, which creates neutral B mesons, we would expect that when they decay we will see equal amounts of matter and antimatter. For whatever reason, there are more negative muons, which are matter, than positive muons, which are antimatter.” 

According to DZero member Gustaaf Brooijmans, a physicist at Columbia University, “We observe an asymmetry that is close to 1 percent.” 

The Tevatron team doesn’t know why this asymmetry is there; they just know that it doesn’t make sense based on the current understanding of the universe.Accoridng to team member and particle physicist Stefan Soldner-Rembold: "Many of us felt goosebumps when we saw the result,” Soldner-Rembold said. “We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before — and beyond what current theories can explain."

If it turns out that a new particle is in fact responsible for the odd tendency of B mesons to favor matter over antimatter, it might be unmasked in the unprecedented high-energy collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, or LHC. 

But the world around is made of matter only and antiparticles can only be produced at colliders, in nuclear reactions or cosmic rays. “What happened to the antimatter?” is one of the central questions of 21st–century particle physics. 

The Fermilab scientists discovered a significant violation of this mathematically perfect view of matter-antimatter symmetry. The violation occurred in the behavior of particles containing bottom quarks, and was beyond what is expected in the current theory, the Standard Model of particle physics. 

The new result, submitted for publication in Physical Review D by the DZero collaboration, an international team of 500 physicists, indicates a one percent difference between the production of pairs of muons and pairs of antimuons in the decay of B mesons produced in high-energy collisions at Fermilab’s Tevatron particle collider. In other words, the particle collisions produced one percent more muons than anti-muons -- a net gain of matter over anti-matter. 

The DZero detector records particles emerging from high-energy proton-antiproton collisions produced by the Tevatron. For this measurement of CP violation, scientists analyzed 10 trillion collisions collected over the last eight years. 

The dominance of matter that we observe in the universe is possible only if there are differences in the behavior of particles and antiparticles. Although physicists have observed such differences (called “CP violation") in particle behavior for decades, these known differences are much too small to explain the observed dominance of matter over antimatter in the universe. 

However, the new study found that the B mesons, which constantly shift back and forth between a state of matter and anti-matter, are slightly slower in transitioning from one phase than in the other. Namely, they shift back into "matter" faster than they shift into "antimatter." This disparity led to the one percent gain of matter seen in the experiment. 

If confirmed by further observations and analysis, the effect seen by DZero physicists could represent another step towards understanding the observed matter dominance by pointing to new physics phenomena beyond what we know today. 

"This exciting new result provides evidence of deviations from the present theory in the decays of B mesons, in agreement with earlier hints," said Denisov. Last year, physicists at both Tevatron experiments, DZero and CDF, observed such hints in studying particles made of a bottom quark and a strange quark. w the result,” said Stefan Soldner-Rembold, co-spokesperson of DZero. “We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before and beyond what current theories can explain.” 

Predications based on the Big Bang can account for less than 20% of the mass and density of the known, observable Hubble length universe. Nor can this theory explain gravity, the discordant data on red shifts, galaxy distribution, colliding galaxies, the abundance of hydrogen and helium, the existence of elementary particles, and why the movement of distant galaxies appears to be speeding up.

Inflation, for example, requires a density at least 20 times larger than that predicted by big bang nucleosynthesis, the theory's explanation of the origin of the lightest elements. An increasing number of cosmologists believe that that density, like the missing matter, excessive gravity, expansion, the clumping of galaxies, distant stars, etc., can be accounted for not by a Big Bang, but an infinite universe peppered with infinite holes in space time which continually breaks down, recreates, and recycles matter (Joseph 2010). Only the addition of ad hoc hypothetical appendages and parameters which are constantly adjusted have prevented the Big Bang theory from complete collapse. Perhaps CERN's LHC or the FermiLab will soon prove otherwise.

Casey Kazan



What First Moments? "There was nothing before.." is nonsense, which only is proof of the fact that human minds can´t cope with the concept of infinity and the definition of existence. Give some proof to the contrary. Anyway, where did the Black Hole come from?

What First Moments? "There was nothing before.." is nonsense, which only is proof of the fact that human minds can´t cope with the concept of infinity and the definition of existence. Give some proof to the contrary. Anyway, where did the Black Hole come from?

Didn't I read a couple months back that anti-particles are also created in ordinary lightning?

This article is a re-post from about 1 month ago...This sight does that a lot it seems.

so to come the univers.

so to come the univers.

stuff happens.

stuff happens.

There was no bloody Big Bang get over it people. The whole theory is so atrocious I still can't understand why people base further theories off it. There was a massive explosion yes and we have a microwave background but going from that to "it created everything" is absurd. Why is the microwave background uniform ?
After the first 0.00000 ... loads of zeros 1 of a second, there had to be a "super particle" something that created every element we have today, where did it come from ? Did God make a mistake and something other than air came out with his fart ?

So let's give a few explinations. If the time in state differes then the energy in state differs ET>=h/2 ting. So maybe there be a matter push/pull making particle smaller or bigger as it moves arround the phase of matter/antimatter, which is quite likly closer to a sine than a square wave.

Maybe we have no proof that far off is made of antimatter, as the nutrino handedness has not been collected enough to seperate emmission sources.

"If matter and antimatter had come out even in those first moments, they would have instantly destroyed each other, leaving nothing but energy behind" - end of quote.

That is: Accordingly to the (very strange) hypothesis of Big Bang EVERYTHING was created from a singularity point.

That is again: Both matter and antimatter was created at once. But this is not possible accordingly to the stated argument from the quotation!?

Then: What is madly wrong about the whole business? Maybe the cosmologists are totally wrong about it all?

- The movement of matter in cosmos are closely connected to the “gravity hypothesis”, and every time another cosmic movement are in the play, the cosmologists are trying to describe these movements as “opposites to the gravity hypothesis” in stead of looking at the cosmic movements in the Universe as cyclic movements of BOTH contraction/assembling AND extraction/distribution. There is NO “anti-this or that”!

This cyclic inwards and outwards turning spiralling movements goes trough ALL creation in the Universe. How difficult can it be????

Natural Philosopher
Ivar Nielsen

One Sunday womens timberland boots morning, I was told that someone was waiting for me in timberland 6 boots office. The young person who answered the rectory timberland boots door said that it was "the woman who said she left all the notes." When I saw her mens timberland boots I was shocked, since I immediately recognized her from church but had no timberland boots outlet idea that it was she who wrote the notes. She was sitting in a chair in timberland roll top boots office with her hands folded in her lap. Her head was bowed and when she raised white timberland boots it to look at me, she could barely smile without pain. Her face was disfigured, and timberland classic boat skin so tight from surgical procedures that smiling or laughing was very difficult for her timberland kids waterproof boots . She had suffered terribly from treatment to remove the growths timberland shoes that had so marred her face. We chatted for a while that Sunday morning and agreed to meet for timberland womens premium boots lunch later that week. As it turned out we went to lunch several timberland boots women times, and she always wore a hat during the meal. I think that treatments of some timberland shoe company sort had caused a lot of her hair to fall out. We shared things about our lives. I told her about my women timberland shoes schooling and growing up. She told me that she had worked for timberland 6 inch years for an insurance company. She never mentioned family, and I did not ask. I have thought about her timberland mens custom often over the years and how she struggled in a society that places an incredible premium on looks, class, wealth and all the other fineries of life. She suffered from a disfigurement that cannot be made to look attractive. I know that her condition black timberland boots hurt her deeply.CLS

It goes back to Einstein's statement that mankind sees everything as a giant illusion. Our mind conepts everything as an image which is the illusion itself. We can't concept in anything other than images. The universe doesn't work like that...images don't and won't concept the universe and the creation of it. Therefore, the human brain or mind, either one, can't concept infinity nor the creation of the universe itself...for we don't know what the universe actually is. This may sound absurd but it's only absurd to those who can't concept what I talked about above. If you think you can concept the universe you are concepting only the easy stuff, the imagery. Try it without images in your head. Just try it right now. See? You can't concept without images. That's my point. The creation of the universe and what's in it, time/space, gravity, electrical charge and magnetism goes beyond images, way way way beyond. We can analyse these things, measure them and write text books about them but we can't actually concept them, that is, know what they really are other than measurements and text book rhetoric with our present level of intelligence. And our present level of intelligence is pretty low.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)