You Create the Caption
Supermassive Black Holes: Will They Unlock the Secrets of Dark Matter?

If ET Calls, Who Speaks For Humanity?


"Who speaks for humankind if ET calls on us?" Paul Davies, chairman of the SETI Post-Detection Taskgroup, is a likely ambassador. The mission of SETI Post-Detection Taskgroup, chaired by Davies, a theoretical physicist and cosmologist at Arizona State University, is to prepare, reflect on, manage, advise, and consult in preparation for and upon the discovery of a putative signal of extraterrestrial intelligent origin.

There isn't any greater potential threat to the status quo than the discovery of extraterrestrial life, which is why some people would prefer we didn't try.

There has been some outrage recently over attempts to contact intelligent aliens, where instead of hiding in the corner and listening real hard some astronomers beamed intense directional messages up and away.  Critics decried these actions as dangerous, though their fears reveal more about us than any eventual ETs.  They assume that they would be similar to humanity, so their first response to finding a more primitive culture would be to exploit the hell out of it.  While such a fate might be pleasingly ironic (for anyone who isn't human, at least), others contend that any species that can make the journey here has advanced to a point where their goals are rather higher-minded than "Shoot us".

Dr Alexander Zaitzev, of the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics at the Russian Academy of Sciences, doesn't think much of these worries either way.  A proponent of METI (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence), in a recent paper he shows that the odds of one of the METI messages being detected is a millionth of that due to powerful radar pulses regularly used in astronomical investigation.  Though whether writing a paper saying "This METI thing we're doing has only a tiny chance of working" is overall a good idea remains to be seen. 

An important point is that METI represents an intentional will to make contact, rather than the accidental alien interception of some random radiation from Earth - the difference between saying "Hello!" and just being a suspicious strange noise late at night.

Most of the objections to contacting aliens are weak under close examination.  We can't suddenly decide to hide after fifty years of pumping electromagnetic radiation into space without rhyme or reason - in fact, we'd better hope that an advanced civilization doesn't catch an episode of "American Idol" and just vaporize us outright. 

Then there's the assumption that aliens would have the same kind of technology we do - despite the extremely obvious fact that our technology can't actually get to other planets.  Any attempt to mask radio emissions will likely look like cavemen closing their eyes to hide from satellite imaging.

The simple fact is that certain people have always opposed progress while other, better people have driven it.  "Experts" decried boiled water as unhealthy compared the vital stuff straight from the river, cursed antibiotics as a temporary placebo, and confidently declared that computers were nothing but expensive toys.  As an intelligent species we must make every effort to contact anyone or thing we can.

But we're in good, if human hands, if we should make contact. The Post-Detection Taskgroup includes some of the planets finest minds from the Konkoly Observatory, Hungary; the British Interplanetary Society; Leeds University, UK; the International Academy of Astronautics, Italy; the Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie, German; Jodrell Bank Observatory, UK; the Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Australia; the Raman Research Institute, India; the Vatican Observatory; the University of California at Berkeley and SETI.

Casey Kazan with Luke McKinney.

Detection Probability Calculation

Image credit: with special thanks to jrtce1

Visit his Flickr photostream at


How about President Obama? He could offer the extraterrestrials universal health care.

Do you just repeatedly recycle old articles or what? I've read this exact one before on this site. With a different picture

Attention New Yorkers: DR. PAUL DAVIES comes to the 92ND STREET Y on April 15. He'll be interviewed by NPR RadioLab's Robert Krulwich.

Tickets are still available at or 212.415.5500.

i nominate larry moe and curley.

Yes, DG does recycle articles. That's why I no longer subscribe.

Regarding this topic: I don't think there is anyone currently living who I would pick as an ambassador to represent ME. If humanity ever decides we need an ambassador, I certainly hope they pick several people from many diverse populations from different countries rather than having a bunch of rich white guys doing the talking for everybody.

Dr. Gene Ray will be the best candidate.

Like the carl sagan topic in cosmos 'Who speaks for earth'..SETI
guys..what to talk ? Note if u are talking to them (through radio signals)and if the signal is from a distant galaxy like M-32 the simple reply to a hello msg will take millions of years to get back a response ..we are not sure what will be tha status of sapiens in planet earth by that time .

Logically SETI institute which is looking into the universe for the past 40 years 24/7 with their large array of disks has to talk ..and Frank drake and Kaku deserves the prestige ...

The vatican observatory! That is outrageous, who in their right minds would want the religious crackpots speaking for humanity! Disgusting

The vatican observatory... Yes, the very same people who persecuted Gallileo and are currently under some serious scrutiny for certain illegal acts. Perfect people to speak on the behalf of the human race.

The very fact that the Vatican HAS an observatory scares me. Give me a real, live scientist rather than a religious nutcase who believes that the human race should worship a zombie.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)