Is the "Great Void" One-Billion Light Years Across the Imprint of Another Universe or a Statistical Error?
In 2004 astronomers found an enormous hole in the southern hemisphere of the Universe, nearly a billion light-years across, empty of both normal matter such as stars, galaxies, and gas, and the mysterious, unseen "dark matter." This was a startling finding, since accepted models of the early
universe say that the big bang created an initially uniform cosmic
landscape, when viewed on large scales. While earlier studies have shown holes, or voids, in the large-scale structure of the Universe, this discovery dwarfed them all. This "nothing" is an enormous hole in the cosmos that defies
standard cosmology and might just be the imprint of another universe
bumping against our own while some astronomers suggested the spot could be a supervoid, a remnant of an early phase transition in the universe.
This giant cold spot has a cosmic microwave background a chilly 20 to 45 per cent lower than the average for the rest of the sky, according to NASA's WMAP satellite.
Smitten, astronomer Lawrence Rudnick decided to take a closer look in 2007 by examining a survey done by the Very Large Array radio telescope in Socorro, New Mexico. His team announced that the most likely cause of the cold spot was a giant void nearly 1 billion light years across that contained almost no stars, galaxies or dark matter.
"We already knew there was something different about this spot in the sky," said Lawrence Rudnick of the University of Minnesota. The region had been dubbed the "WMAP Cold Spot," because it stood out in a map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation made by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotopy Probe (WMAP) satellite, launched by NASA in 2001.
Meanwhile, Laura Mersini-Houghton of the University of North Carolina theorizes is that it could be the imprint of another universe beyond our own, caused by quantum entanglement between universes before they were separated by cosmic inflation. Laura Mersini-Houghton said, "Standard cosmology cannot explain such a giant cosmic hole" and made the remarkable hypothesis that the WMAP cold spot is "… the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own."
String theory says that ours is just one of 10500 possible universes, and Mersini-Houghton's calculations suggest that this giant void could have been caused by a neighboring universe pushing against our own, repelling gravity and the galaxies contained within.
If true this provides the first empirical evidence for a parallel universe. It would also support recent developments in String theory.
The Mersini-Houghton team claims there are testable consequences for its theory. If the parallel universe theory is true there will be a similar void in the northern hemisphere of the Celestial sphere. Mersini-Houghton has worked on a variety of topics on the particle physics-cosmology interface. She is particularly interested in the possibility of generating dark energy from transplanckian physics in string theory, gravity and quantum field theory in curved space, and higher-dimension braneworlds.
Earlier this year, 2009, Dragan Huterer of the University of Michigan and colleague Ray Zhang threw cold water on these theories, arguing that the spot is no more than a byproduct of the statistical tool commonly used to examine CMB data, called—the Spherical Mexican Hat Wavelets method. Really!
Huterer and Zhang analyzed the cold spot using two simpler statistical tools, finding that the cold spot's temperature deviation from the CMB average is, after all, no more or less than anywhere else in the universe.
Hunter and Zhang not withstanding, there seems to be more cold spots that hot spots on the cosmic background radiation map, with the distribution skewed toward the cold end, suggesting there's something wrong with current inflationary theory, The slight variations in cosmic background radiation are thought to be the outcopme of quantum flucuations that resulted in greater and lesser accumulations of matter. The slightly colder pateches reflect the places were matter has scattered the radiation. But the amount of matter taht can be deduced from the COBE and WMAP maps suggest that there wasn't enough ordinary matter to form the galaxies we now see. The missing attarction is presumed to be from dark matter. As yet there's a 99 percent probability of the numbers being correct, where scientists like to see something closer to 99.9999 percent to declare the data safe.
The CMB, faint radio waves that are the remnant radiation from the Big Bang, is the earliest "baby picture" available of the Universe. Irregularities in the CMB show structures that existed only a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang.
Casey Kazan
Sources:
http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2007/coldspot
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.laura.mersini-houghton
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/09/090923-cold-spot-universe-cmb.html
Comments
« A Huge Galaxy Discovered Surrounding the Most Distant Black Hole (A Holiday Classic) | Main | You Create the Caption »

"… the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own."
Really?
Hm.
Casey, I had to read this twice to make sure I didn't miss your usual sarcasm - it's absense is just too deafining! I mean, I know you like long sentences with VBWs (very big words). But, seriously" ...generating dark energy from transplanckian physics in string theory, gravity and quantum field theory in curved space, and higher-dimension braneworlds"... Oy.
Posted by: steven | December 29, 2009 at 08:34 AM
Dude thats like totally crazy man!
RT
www.privacy-resources.es.tc
Posted by: John Roberts | December 29, 2009 at 09:51 AM
"...one of 10500 possible universes..."
Possible markup error, but shouldn't it be 10^500 ?
Posted by: Steve Kerrison | December 29, 2009 at 09:57 AM
You could use an editor
Posted by: jon | December 29, 2009 at 10:11 AM
How did a telescope in New Mexico find a void in the southern hemisphere? (Legitimately curious)
Posted by: DJ | December 29, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Interesting article - worth reading, but did you even proofread this thing? By the end of the article I count 10 spelling and grammar errors.
Posted by: Bob Loblaw | December 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM
My balls hurt..
Posted by: Dude | December 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM
mistakes happen even in articles that have been proof read, stop being picky we're all human
Posted by: pete | December 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Usually I'd side with Dude here and bust out the grammar Nazis, but on this one I have to agree with DJ. I can understand a mistake or two in an article, but I've found 7 obvious errors in one paragraph. It's almost like the second to last paragraph was an after thought quickly added to the article before posting.
Now I am sure some Nazi will point out all the errors that I have made. But, keep in mind, I'm not the one who expects people to come back and read more of what I've written.
Posted by: Al | December 29, 2009 at 01:22 PM
I agree with Jon... you could use an editor, or at the very least a spell check
Posted by: Joseph | December 29, 2009 at 02:20 PM
It smacks of the "M"embrane theory. It is the region where one membrane accidentally rubbed up against our own membrane. The quest is where is the lubrication?
Posted by: MichaelG | December 30, 2009 at 12:33 AM
i find this news interesting but the details given need calm consideration. It is too hasty to conclude that it is a matter of many universes or that we have now evidence for the String Theory and the likes.There can evolve anomalies developed within a general homogeneity. Hasty conclusions in the light of existing knowledge can prevent us from having an innovative explanation. There are so many mysteries prevailing still about the Universe that we think we are a part of. We have also yet to define what we mean by many universes. I think we still need to characterize matter, dark matter and space voids properly. Just as matter and energy are inter convertable, we may have similar relationships between dark, visible,black hole and voids in space. Physics is still far less developed to solve the known mysteries of the universe! It will take time as cosmological experiments are difficult to fix things precisely compared to the micro and macroworld on Earth.
Posted by: Narendra Nath | December 30, 2009 at 01:57 AM
Could it be the point where the Big Bang originated...and it's torn a hole in space time...?
Posted by: TJ Colatrella | December 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM
WTF is with the typos in this? Awful.
Maybe the void in your editing is a parallel blog bumping up against.
Posted by: Tom Homely | December 30, 2009 at 05:50 PM
"… the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own."
Ummmm....
Ummmmm....
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Does she work for FOX News Channel or something?
Let's see, her evidence supporting such an astounding conclusion consists of "Because I said so"?!?!?!
Sounds like Professor of Meteorology Barry Cooper, er, Professor of Nuclear Physics, er, Professor of Helio/Terran Interactions, er, Professor of... Oh wait, Barry is just a Political Science Professor at Calgary. He operates the same way: "Because I said so, and I'm paid good money to say it"!!!
Posted by: Jim Bryant | December 30, 2009 at 09:35 PM
If the idea of a multiverse is to be accepted then the number would be infinite. The reason being is all aspects of future being available then the number would correspond accordingly. The void could be the cosmic drain we are all swirling around! Their guess is as good as yours. Simply put, we don't know... yet.
Posted by: Ricochet | March 28, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Finger skate are used by a range of people from those utilizing them as toys to skateboarding and related sports professionals envisioning not only their own skating maneuvers but for others as well and can include the use for planning out competition courses as skating boarding develops into an international sport.
Skate with your fingers, another feeling
Posted by: finger skate | May 19, 2010 at 01:57 AM
Hunter and Zhang not withstanding, there seems to be more cold spots that hot spots on the cosmic background radiation map.thank you for share with us i like watches,especially www.watches-user.com/omega-watches-c-372.html
Omega watches,it is good.
Posted by: Offer wrist watches | May 26, 2010 at 08:56 PM
Ummmm....
Ummmmm....
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Does she work for FOX News Channel or something?
Posted by: coach | May 31, 2010 at 06:59 PM
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Posted by: coach handbags | May 31, 2010 at 07:01 PM
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Does she work for FOX News Channel or something?
Posted by: cheap rolex watches | May 31, 2010 at 07:03 PM
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Posted by: Büyüler | June 18, 2010 at 07:47 AM
What ever happened to Scientific Method?
Does she work for FOX News Channel or something?
Posted by: Ayırma Büyüsü | June 21, 2010 at 01:11 AM
I really appreciate your help, it is very useful for me,you will get good grades!
Posted by: cheap chanel | June 22, 2010 at 12:28 AM
The author was probably drunk while writing the artacle. Bug deal. It's still a veru intersting arcle.
Posted by: Elias | August 07, 2010 at 07:51 PM