Einstein's Eureka! Moment: Does Unconscious Thought Underlie Creative Problem Solving?
Follow the Daily Galaxy
Add Daily Galaxy to igoogle page AddThis Feed Button Join The Daily Galaxy Group on Facebook Follow The Daily Galaxy Group on twitter
 

« Turbo-Charged Evolution: Hot Climates Found to Affect DNA | Main | Galaxy Fans - Follow Us Daily on Facebook »

August 03, 2009

Einstein's Eureka! Moment: Does Unconscious Thought Underlie Creative Problem Solving?

2102403335_5b96c625bb For years Albert Einstein had been trying to reconcile two seemingly contradictory theories about space and time. One day while riding a street car home, he was struck by the sight of Bern's famous clock tower. The answer to special relativity was simple and elegant: time can beat at different rates throughout the universe, depending on how fast you moved.

"Conscious thought is better at making linear, analytic decisions, but unconscious thought is especially effective at solving complex problems," says Adam Galinsky of the Kellogg School of Management. "Unconscious activation may provide inspirational sparks underlying the 'Aha!' moment that eventually leads to important discoveries." Moments similar to the one Einstein experienced as he watched trains moving into the station past rows of clocks that were synchronized with the one atop the famed Bern tower

Most of us have experienced a situation where, after long hours of trying to solve a certain problem, we give up, and go get a break, only to come back and solve the problem within moments. This appears to be a somewhat commonplace situation. However, the science behind it is much more complex.

According to Galinsky and Chen-Bo Zhong from the University of Toronto and Ap Dijkstererhuis of Radboud University Nijmegen – unconscious thought results in creative problem-solving in a two step process.

But this is not as simple as having an “Aha!” moment and moving on. The trio note that while the distraction might be helpful in coming up with the solution, a period of steady thought must follow so as to understand the solution and how those solutions can be applied. Similarly, while such moments might be useful in dealing with particularly tricky problems, easier problems should be confronted the old fashion way.

The researchers conducted two experiments to test their idea. In the first experiment, 94 subjects participated in a Remote-Association Test (RAT), which tests for creativity. In this test, participants were presented with three words (a triad) and were asked to come up with a fourth word that is linked with all three words. For example, if presented with the words cheese, sky and ocean, the correct answer would be blue (blue cheese, blue sky, blue ocean).

Subjects were shown nine very difficult triads (but were instructed not to solve them yet) and were then divided into groups. For five minutes following the RAT, participants were either concentrating on the triads they had just seen (the conscious thought group) or engaging in a test completely unrelated to the RAT (the unconscious thought group).

Following the five-minute interval, all of the subjects participated in a lexical decision test. During this test, subjects were shown sequences of letters and had to indicate as quickly as possible if the sequences were English words or not. The sequences presented included answers to the RAT triads, random words and non-words. Finally, subjects were again shown the RAT items and had to write down their answers.

The second experiment involved 36 subjects and had a similar set up to the previous experiment, although the RAT triads presented were much easier to solve compared to those in the first experiment.

The results pointed to members of the unconscious thought group in the lexical decision test as having much faster responses to the letter sequences. The RAT problems however saw both groups poll equally well.

Posted by Casey Kazan with Josh Hill.

Adapted from Association for Psychological Science Press Release

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-09/afps-ehd093008.php

Comments

Thanks for interesting article - I really enjoy your articles.
I just had a “Aha!” moment with my previous comment post.
Casey, as daft at it seems, I have been posting replies for some time and frustrated that nothing ever appeared. What I thought was your "censorship" turned out to be that I had failed to scroll up after hitting "preview" and I therefore had never entered the magic alpha-numeric code after posting. I'm sure others have experienced the same trap. Maybe the input could be reorganised?

Is this 'research' a BGO? I'll bet Newton didn't say 'Gravity' when a large cooking apple fell on his head! In fact, his thoughts might have been completely unconscious. Fact is though, "Sleep on it!" DOES work.

FINE AND RELEVANT ARTICLE!
"Unconscious activation may provide inspirational sparks underlying the 'Aha!' moment that eventually leads to important discoveries."
I would say: CCONCIOUS activation of the unconscious may provide . . ."
But I don’t give much for constructed experiments when it comes to experiences of the very fluent concept of intuition. The AHA moment comes when you are quiet and not when you are very physical active.
- It is my believe that Einstein would have come much far understanding the Universe by just using his intuition, but he got caught in the spells of mathematics and by the heritage of Isaac Newton.
If Einstein had gone for the pure intuition, he had come up with the very same cyclic and holistic view of Cosmos as our ancestors have had for some thousands of years.
- Then he, for example, would have re-discovered that "gravity" is not a "one way law" but a movement in Cosmos which goes both ways, inwards and outwards.
He also would have discovered that "time" does not exist and therefore not can be connected to Space.
And, via the cyclical and ancient holistic understanding, he also would have rejected the illogical concept of Big Bang.
- The very concept of intuition is cyclical and holistic - otherwise it would not provide us with the AHA Eureka moments of truth.

Ivar Nielsen
Natural Philosopher
www.native-science.net

i want to know from Iver Nielsen, as to what he means that time does not exist. according to him, what is space? what about motion in space? is not time a factor in the motion in space?

Roger,
Accordingly to me, Space is the Universe in which all elements undergoes an eternal assembling and distributing movement without no suddenly Big Bang or other stange hypothesis or theories.
What happens with time if time is connected to movements in space?
What happens with time in the middle of a swirling galaxy?
What happens with time if it goes in the opposite direction of an original movement in Space?
"Time" is a human concept we can use in order to cath a bus.
The time-space you are looking at in an actual state in a galaxy, changes in a the next state in the galaxy evolution.
In Space, all kind of spiraling and curving movents bends time in and out in the timeless Universe.


Post a comment

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf7f753ef0115715aac56970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Einstein's Eureka! Moment: Does Unconscious Thought Underlie Creative Problem Solving?:

« Turbo-Charged Evolution: Hot Climates Found to Affect DNA | Main | Galaxy Fans - Follow Us Daily on Facebook »




1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8





9


11


12


13


14


15

Our Partners

technology partners

A


19


B

About Us/Privacy Policy

For more information on The Daily Galaxy and to contact us please visit this page.



E