Is Hyper Evolution Possible? A Galaxy Classic
Think it takes thousands or even millions of
years for animals to evolve significantly new traits? Think again. New
research lends just a touch of credibility to the idea behind the
popular sci-fi TV series Heroes, which portrays certain humans as
having quickly evolved new astounding traits in response to
increasingly tumultuous environmental pressures.
In 1971 biologists moved 5 adult pairs of Italian wall lizards from their island home of Pod Kopiste, in the South Adriatic Sea, and introduced them to the neighboring island of Pod Mrcaru. An international team of researchers discovered that introducing these small, green-backed lizards, Podarcis sicula, to a new environment caused them to undergo shockingly fast and large-scale evolutionary changes.
Researchers returned to the islands twice a year for three years, in the spring and summer of 2004, 2005 and 2006. Captured lizards were transported to a field laboratory and measured for snout-vent length, head dimensions and body mass. Tail clips taken for DNA analysis confirmed that the Pod Mrcaru lizards were genetically identical to the source population on Pod Kopiste. In other words, there is no doubt that these lizards are the offspring of the 1971 transplant. The results of the study were recently published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The lizards evolved entirely new digestive system features to cope with dietary changes, evolved bigger heads and also ceased to defend territories—an instinct once very integral to the species behavior back on their original home territory.
“Striking differences in head size and shape, increased bite strength and the development of new structures in the lizard’s digestive tracts were noted after only 36 years, which is an extremely short time scale,” remarks Duncan Irschick, a professor of biology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Observed changes in head morphology were caused by adaptation to a different food source explains Irschick. The lizards on the barren island of Pod Kopiste were well-suited to catching mobile prey, feasting mainly on insects. Life on Pod Mrcaru, where they had never lived before, offered them an abundant supply of plant foods, including the leaves and stems from native shrubs. Analysis of the stomach contents of lizards on Pod Mrcaru showed that their diet included up to two-thirds plants, depending on the season, a large increase over the population of Pod Kopiste.
“As a result, individuals on Pod Mrcaru have heads that are longer, wider and taller than those on Pod Kopiste, which translates into a big increase in bite force,” says Irschick. “Because plants are tough and fibrous, high bite forces allow the lizards to crop smaller pieces from plants, which can help them break down the indigestible cell walls.”
Examination of the lizard’s digestive tracts revealed something even more surprising. Eating more plants caused the development of new structures called cecal valves, designed to slow the passage of food by creating fermentation chambers in the gut, where microbes can break down the difficult to digest portion of plants. Cecal valves, which were found in hatchlings, juveniles and adults on Pod Mrcaru, have never been reported for this species, including the source population on Pod Kopiste.
“These structures actually occur in less than 1 percent of all known species of scaled reptiles,” says Irschick. “Our data shows that evolution of novel structures can occur on extremely short time scales. Cecal valve evolution probably went hand-in-hand with a novel association between the lizards on Pod Mrcaru and microorganisms called nematodes that break down cellulose, which were found in their hindguts.”
Change in diet also affected the population density and social structure of the Pod Mrcaru population. Because plants provide a larger and more predictable food supply, there were more lizards in a given area on Pod Mrcaru. Food was obtained through browsing rather than the active pursuit of prey, and the lizards had given up defending territories.
“What is unique about this finding is that rapid evolution can affect not only the structure and function of a species, but also influence behavioral ecology and natural history,” says Irschick.
So next time you see Hayden Panettiere on TV running around in her cheer skirt regenerating her limbs, just think how the premise may be just slightly less crazy that you previously suspected.
Posted by Rebecca Sato.
Related Galaxy posts:
Is the Human Species in Evolution's Fast Lane? -A Galaxy Classic
Bringing Ancient Human Viruses Back to Life: A Jurassic Park or Salvation?
Loren Eiseley on Evolution: Transcending the Cosmos -A Galaxy Insight
Study Source: University of Massachusetts Amherst






Is it really evolution if they have identical DNA? Wouldn't Evolution require *different* DNA? This sounds more like adaptation to me.
Posted by: David G. | July 29, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Is there a difference between adaptation and evolution?
We're led to believe they're the same thing.
E.g. are the changes small changes or big changes? If the lizards were introduced into the ocean floor, would they have grown gills by now? Or would they have died by drowning?
Posted by: James | July 29, 2009 at 08:21 PM
See stickleback evolution for more examples of this type of rapid change in shape:
Albert et al.
The genetics of adaptive shape shift in stickleback: pleiotropy and effect size. Evolution 61: 76-85.
Posted by: Sterling | July 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Evolution does require a change in DNA. Without having read the mentioned publication I presume they haven't sequenced entire genomes, but rather made a phylogenetic tree based on parts of the genomes (fingerprints), since that would be the usual procedure to investigate common ancestry.
Evolution is -by the way- one of the mechanisms by which adaptation takes place, but not the only one. Individuals show plasticity in their responses to the environment, not to mention the 'memes' that are all the rage in evolution-land...
Posted by: Wouter | July 30, 2009 at 10:08 AM
It may also be that recessive traits which occur naturally though infrequently were suddenly highly adaptive to the environment. Kind of like if little people suddenly had a natural advantage due to really great free condos built with small doors.
If a recessive trait gives its holder a natural advantage, that trait becomes dominant in the existing population. Especially if you starve to death or get eaten without it...
Posted by: Reade B | July 30, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Hi, I love this site ! Really fascinating !
Everybody needs to tune to the pulse of the galaxy !
As for this artickle, how about showing us how they look like using the classic before and after pictures ?
cause we start losing ground here :
http://www.harunyahya.net/V2/Lang/en/Pg/WorkDetail/Number/13427
This next video is about the golden ratio, how it's tied to the Ka'bah and its global positionning, matched and backed by the ayah in the Qur'an to its very intricate but precise (scientific?) editing — explained right in the end. Astounding secret revealed ! Rather stunning for a 7th century illeterate...
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9h9pf_the-signs-pt13-le-miracle-de-la-kaa_webcam
Cheers!
Posted by: Anti-Devolutionist | July 31, 2009 at 01:43 AM
Could this be evidence of what Stephen J Gould referred to as "Punctuated Equilibrium"?
Posted by: Phil | August 03, 2009 at 04:22 PM
actually though i ain't a professional or sort of but a grade 8th student but i am going against this theory of hyper evolution because according to what i know it isn't something very new and maybe is about the same to adaptive radiation or darwin's theory because these type of certain changes certainly need to occur and this is the reason that all creatures that darwin studied were alive just because those creatures had had a speedy evolution so they were able to survive all those years i mean that this theory isn't new but something that has already been discovered so it's just something quite wayoff for me on the basis of the above experiment.
Posted by: Harshit Singh | December 27, 2009 at 05:54 AM
Evolution does require a change in DNA. Without having read the mentioned publication I presume they haven't sequenced entire genomes, but rather made a phylogenetic tree based on parts of the genomes (fingerprints), since that would be the usual procedure to investigate common ancestry.
Posted by: Travel chacha | February 04, 2010 at 02:24 AM