Space-Based Solar Power Gains Momentum
The dream of launching satellites into space to harness the sun’s energy and beam it back to earth is looking increasingly realistic as Japan researches satellites that convert solar light into lasers, which then beams it down onto a facility that
converts it into clean, usable power and U.S. companies aggressively research networks of satellite-based photovoltaic cells.
PowerSat Corp.has filed for patents that it says could overcome two of the major hurdles facing satellite solar technology. The company said it is developing technology that could link as many as 300 satellites together in space, allowing satellites covered in photovoltaic cells to beam energy to one big satellite, which would then transmit the energy to earth. The second technology would help lower the high cost of launching satellites into orbit by using solar-powered electronic thrusters to send the satellites from low-earth orbit to geosynchronous orbit 22,000 miles above the earth.
The Pentagon has studied solar satellite technology for decades, but has not aggressively pursued the program because of its high costs. But PowerSat said in a news release, “The underlying technology components are proven and systems will be deployable within a decade,”according to the Everett, Washington-based company.
One of he latest and greatest way to generate energy is to launch plates made of chromium and neodymium into orbit, which then convert 42% of solar light into lasers, which then shoots down onto a facility that converts it into clean, usable power.
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and Osaka University are working together to develop the device, which converts sunlight into laser-light with four times the efficiency of any previous attempt. According to a report out of Tokyo, the team is working on Space-based solar power systems, which can collect sunlight in space and then convert it into laser light, which is then transmitted to Earth and used for electricity.
The project will work by storing sunlight-based energy in plates made from a sintered powder of metals, such as chromium and neodymium. When weak laser light is shined onto the plate, the stored energy is transferred to the laser where its strength is amplified by a factor of four. In one test, a 0.5-watt laser was amplified to 180-watts by the plates. Scientists have thus far been able to garner 40-percent of the solar energy produced, and they hope to have a system ready for satellite mounting by 2030.
The project has another clear advantage over terrestrial solar projects in that it will not be subject to cloudy conditions or nighttime darkness. The device will be able to collect solar power 24 hours a day. By improving the solar-to-laser efficiency and having solar collectors from 100 to 200 meters long, they'll be able to match a 1-gigawatt nuclear power plant. At the very least, they’ll have created a giant death-ray useful for enslaving the rest of the world. If you go to JAXA’s home page there’s currently a friendly headline “Using Satellites to Save Lives”, but I’m pretty sure that’s just a ploy to divert us from their death-ray project. Either way, should be pretty darn cool!
Posted by Casey Kazan with Rebecca Sato.
Related Galaxy Posts:
Harnessing the Stars: EU to Attempt Laser-based Fusion
Renewable Energy Not “Green”?
Green Energy -The NexGen Wave is Here
Related Blogs:
http://www.pinktentacle.com/2007/09/electricity-from-orbiting-solar-powered-lasers/
http://www.blogowogo.com/blog_article.php?aid=955889&t=
http://influencepeddler.blogspot.com/2007/09/japan-applies-to-host-next-bond.html
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/09/orbiting_space.php
Links:
http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html
http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/04/japanese-scientists-make-breakthrough-in-space-based-laser-power/
http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/digest.msp?id=1930







and no one thinks this might some how alter something as a result?! Hopefully tests, many tests, will be conducted before implemented...
Posted by: matt | June 18, 2009 at 05:49 PM
It would be amazing if we could launch satellites into space to harness the sun’s energy and beam it back to earth.
Posted by: solar panels | June 18, 2009 at 06:39 PM
Great theory...expensive systems however.
Launches in geosynch orbit that is an equatorial strip at some 3 earth diameter distance (or about 22,000 miles or 37,000 Km height) are rather expensive.
In case the sats are planned in the gosynch orbit (or Clarcke orbit)
there is a 'main mistake' in the article : there are NOT 24hours /day of sun illumination...this is a gross mistake...sorry but who says this is in ERROR.
Furthermore to keep the sat in orbit (due to moon attraction and other reasons) there is fuel to be expended .....another expensive load to transport the sat at 37,000Km.
Again this is cost.
Lifetime of current 'state of the art' geosynch satellites is LESS than 10-12 Years...after that time only God knows what will be the fuel-less orbit.
Regards to these visionary peoples
Posted by: claudio | June 19, 2009 at 01:24 PM
There are some arguments against this system, for instance, microwave radiation pouring through certain areas causing cancer & mutations over time, & the " Mad Scientist " scenario where a terrorist or group of terrorists takes control of a satellite via hacking its systems, possibly turning it into a " death ray " ( Dr. Evil would be pleased..... !! )
Other than those, this sounds viable.
Posted by: EvilCosmicMonkeyfrom Knoxville | June 19, 2009 at 04:46 PM
thank you. Beatifull Archile !
sohpet - muhabbet - sohpet-çet - sohbet - chat - sohbet kanallari - sohbet - kızlarla sohbet - sohbet chat - sesli sohbet - sesli chat - kamerali sohbet - kamerali chat sohbet - chat - sohbet - sohbet odaları - sohbet kanalları - mirc indir - mirc - bedava mirc - burç - burc - siir - haberler - Sohbet - sohbet siteleri - Müzik Dinle - mp3 Dinle - Dizi izle - Dizi izle - yonja sohbet - sohbet sitesi sohbet odaları sohpet sohbet
Posted by: chat sohbet | June 21, 2009 at 07:06 AM
Yes, and the Laser energy loss during retransmission will be
horrendous, unreliable, deadly, and costly.
This one is already in development. Microwaves versus Lasers
http://nlspropulsion.net/Documents/MPTS_June_2009_No_drawing.pdf
Posted by: fedrive | June 21, 2009 at 09:13 AM
fedrive:
Microwaves are better, at least they won't " zap " aircraft, other satellites, buildings, people.....
Then again, " leakage " from a microwave power transmission could cause human health hazards over time, & perhaps damage our environment almost like a laser beam. But the damage would be more cumulative over time.
Posted by: EvilCosmicMonkeyfrom Knoxville | June 23, 2009 at 07:45 AM
ty my admin nice
Posted by: dizi izle | June 25, 2009 at 12:26 PM