Global-Warming Tipping Point: 9 Degrees Temperature Increase Would Devastate Earth's Population
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, the director of the Potsdam
Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, says that if the
buildup of greenhouse gases and its consequences pushed global
temperatures 9 degrees Fahrenheit higher than today — well below the
upper temperature range that scientists project could occur from global
warming — Earth’s population would be devastated. “In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last
we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying
capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people."
Schellenhuber's comments at the COP 15 Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change underscore that, given high rates of observed emissions, the worst-case IPCC scenario trajectories are unfolding. For many key parameters, the climate system is already moving beyond the patterns of natural variability within which our society and economy have developed and thrived. These parameters include global mean surface temperature, sea-level rise, ocean and ice sheet dynamics, ocean acidification, and extreme climatic events. There is a significant risk that many of the trends will accelerate, leading to an increasing risk of abrupt or irreversible climatic shifts.
Recent observations show that societies are highly vulnerable to even modest levels of climate change, with poor nations and communities particularly at risk. Temperature rises above 2°C will be very difficult for contemporary societies to cope with, and will increase the level of climate disruption through the rest of the century.
It is important for people to understand that the warming the IPCC talks about is not hypothetical. Eleven of the last 12 years (1995-2006) rank among the warmest years in global surface temperature since 1850. Glaciers and snow cover have declined, and ice sheets from Greenland and parts of Antarctica are melting. The ocean has been absorbing more than 80% of the heat added to the climate system, yet the average temperature of the ocean has increased up to a depth of 3,000 meters, causing seawater to expand and contributing to sea level rise.
Schellnhuber, citing his own research, said that at certain “tipping points,” higher temperatures could cause areas of the ocean to become deoxygenated, resulting in what he calls “oxygen holes” between 600 and 2,400 feet deep. These are areas so depleted of the gas that they would badly disrupt the food chain.
Unabated warming would also lead to “disruption of the monsoon, collapse of the Amazon rain forest and the Greenland ice sheet will meltdown,” he said.
Scientists must make clear the disastrous effects of climate change so the world takes action now to cut carbon emissions, leading economist Nicholas Stern said on told the gathering of 2,000 scientists.
"You have to tell people very clearly and strongly just how difficult (a temperature rise of) four, five, six or seven degrees Celsius is," he said.
"Billions of people would have to move and there would be very severe conflict," said Stern, a professor at the London School of Economics and a former British Treasury economist.
"That's a story that must be told to persuade people it's a very bad idea to go anywhere near five degrees. This is not a black swan, this is a big probability of a devastating outcome," he
Posted by Casey Kazan
Sources:
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/13/scientist-warming-could-cut-population-to-1-billion/
http://www-ramanathan.ucsd.edu/dai/Schellnhuber-PNAS-2008.pdf
http://www.copenhagenclimatecouncil.com/get-informed/news/scientists-deliver-politicians-key-messages-for-copenhagen-climate-talks.html
http://www.copenhagenclimatecouncil.com/get-informed/news/clear-and-present-danger-a-conversation-with-nobel-laureate-steve-chu-on-the-risks-of-climate-change.html
http://in.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idINTRE52B37Q20090312?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0







Disagree with the generic statement about '9 degrees Fahrenheit higher than today'.
As known to the scientific community The scale of Fahrenheit should be abandoned as NOT LINEAR when compared to The Kelvin (absolute temperature ) and to the Celsius (centigrade) temperature scales.
I do NOT understand why the americans (the only one left in this planet ) still use such an 'ODD scale' for expressing the temperature.
Furthermore it is extremely doubtfull that the professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuberin (a German) has ever talked about '9 degrees Fahrenheit' .......that only americans would use.
NOT even NASA uses anymore the Fahrenheit scale.......may be you find on 'USA-Today newspaper' temp-predictions or reports in degrees Fahrenheit.
Anyway aside from this 'very american way' of ... expressing temperature... , The professor might be right....5 °C global temp.increase are adeguate for terminating our specie.
Regards to the degrees Celsius.
Posted by: claudio | June 21, 2009 at 03:16 AM
thank you. Beatifull Archile !
sohpet - muhabbet - sohpet-çet - sohbet - chat - sohbet kanallari - sohbet - kızlarla sohbet - sohbet chat - sesli sohbet - sesli chat - kamerali sohbet - kamerali chat sohbet - chat - sohbet - sohbet odaları - sohbet kanalları - mirc indir - mirc - bedava mirc - burç - burc - siir - haberler - Sohbet - sohbet siteleri - Müzik Dinle - mp3 Dinle - Dizi izle - Dizi izle - yonja sohbet - sohbet sitesi sohbet odaları sohpet sohbet
Posted by: sohbet | June 21, 2009 at 05:38 AM
Celsius is the best. You just cant go wrong with celsius.
Posted by: Monty Moor | June 21, 2009 at 07:54 AM
I'm sure he wants to be the one making the selection when we all arrive at the Green camp. People like him have been hard at work reducing the numbers of negroes in the world by suppressing DDT and GM crops.
After all, this planet has a carrying capacity of black people, lets get on it...
Posted by: tehdude | June 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Hi,
We have just added your latest post "Global-Warming Tipping Point: 9 Degrees Temperature Increase Would Devastate Earth's Population" to our Directory of Science . You can check the inclusion of the post here . We are delighted to invite you to submit all your future posts to the directory and get a huge base of visitors to your website.
Warm Regards
Scienz.info Team
http://www.scienz.info
Posted by: marie | June 23, 2009 at 02:28 AM
good
Sohpet -
çet -
cet -
Chat Siteleri -
Sohbet Kanallari -
Chat -
Seviyeli chat -
Sohbet Odaları -
Sohbet siteleri -
Chat adresleri -
Sohbet chat -
muhabbet chat -
chat siteleri -
Sohbet Sayfaları -
Seviyeli sohbet -
Dini Sohbet -
Posted by: chat siteleri | June 28, 2009 at 06:07 AM
Only the ratio Kelvin scale is useful . The earth is about 300k , the sun about 6000k . Textbook classical physics shows our temperature is constrained to be about 1/21st the temperature the sun decides to be and the very minor changes in earth's spectrum from the bit of the "green" gas upon which every bite of food you eat is ultimately constructed , makes equally minor change in that ratio . ( See my http://CoSy.com for implementation of the fundamental Stefan-Boltzmann/Kirchhoff relationship . ) The notion of a "runaway" greenhouse effect is an idiocy that just shows the person claiming it either has not a clue about temperature physics -- or is a purposeful liar .
Posted by: Bob Armstrong | June 30, 2009 at 12:15 AM