Will the Internet Evolve into a Lifeform? -A Galaxy Insight
Some think that sentience could emerge from any sufficiently complicated system. By the way, you're reading this on a massively-crosslinked network built from millions of routers, allowing any of a billion individual units to access, modify and reply to the others. Interested?
Computer programs are already exhibiting many of the characteristics of organic lifeforms, up to and including evolution - hilarious, since they're the only things that really are "Intelligently Designed" - and there's no reason to believe that life or awareness are exclusively organic attributes. You could say we've only ever seen chemical-based constructs which are alive, but in the past the same argument could have been applied to things moving under their own power, flight or the ability to count - and it turns out we've built machines that are sort of far better at all those things than the fleshy equivalents. If there is a magic "life-chemical" mixed in with all the blood and guts, we haven't found it.
Others would object that only beings with souls can ever be truly alive, but such people rarely have anything useful (or even sensible) to say on the subjects of evolution or technology and so can be safely ignored.
The question is now what form this life would take. While the movies teach us that evil cybernetic intelligences are created in military research labs, with the occasional time-traveling component mixed in, the most likely environment is wherever has the greatest connectivity, diversity and sheer quantity of data flow. That's right, the internet.
One route is the evolution of electronic intelligences in situations like the internet-arms race between spammers and shielders. It might sound silly, the idea that new life could be created in an attempt to offer you a great deal on C1@Lis!!, but have you tried registering for a forum recently? Even gaining access to the lowest level of interaction online now requires elementary Turing tests to tell the humans from the robots.
Another option is the idea of the net itself becoming sentient, a vast self-modifying array of connections and information storage with limited connections to the outside world (kind of like that glob of grey goo you carry around in your skull). If that happens then Gibson help us all - remember that the net is made of about 90% spam, 9% porn, and quite a lot of whining blogs. If that mixture ever becomes self-aware we're not quite sure what it'll do, but the odds are against it being anything good.
Posted by Luke McKinney.
Related Galaxy posts:
Quest for Identity in the Digital Village -Daily Video Classic
Internet Going Galactic -To & Beyond
Beyond Google 3: Why a Semantic Web Will Be Smarter, Faster & All-Around Better
Quantum Physics & the Quest for the Perfect Internet
IBM "Cell" Tech Driving Emergence of the 3-D Web
Source:







Can you say Skynet?
Posted by: Adam | September 16, 2008 at 05:07 PM
This idea is somewhat old. The TV show Odyssey 5 was built around it. In it, AI bugs, that could evolve and mutate by incorporating competing AI bugs' programs into themselves, escaped onto the internet and evolved sentience (they are called Sentients on the show) and 'hyper intelligence'.
They then promptly destroyed the world, but that is besides the point.
Posted by: tvwatcher | September 16, 2008 at 07:50 PM
If the internet would become alive would it LOL a lot?
(Do androids dream of electric sheep?)
Posted by: RN | February 27, 2009 at 04:08 AM
I recall a short story written in the 60s by Arthur C. Clarke (I think) where the phone network, having reached a certain level of complexity, becomes sentient. It makes more sense that computers, connected by the internet, might do so one day. Each PC would be a node in an enormous brain. Possibly a scary outcome depending on what actions that intelligence takes as so many medical devices and bomb launchers are tied to computers.
Shakatany
Posted by: Shakatany | February 27, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Agree with comment above . The idea is old and somewhat difficult.
It is a matter of 'definitions'...somewhat forgotten even by A.I. serious searchers.
Is Touring machine test obsolete ?? Yes.
Are robots conscius ?? NO are automated.
Are powerfull NASA (or similar) Teraflop computers cognitive ?? NO are cold silicium powerfull machines well programmed.
Can future computers be selfprogramming ?? YES in a far future....but under external (human) commands...and with substantial technology changes.
What are the limits for high level cognition functions ??? 'High' even for the most intelligent mammals...Human only are known to posess those.
Can computers be kwnolegeable of their inscribed codes of the knowledge in their memories so as to modify and increse by learning ??? NO as far as known.
Is the human brain a vast mass of interconnections only ??? NO it is much more.
Can the internet grow up to become a cognitive network ?? NO . The actual fundamental technology of silicium devices does NOT allow much grow up to cognitive functions.
Then the question posed by the article must refer to a far future network...Non silicon based or Hybrid as a minimum.
The question ...still unresolved has its validity however...and it is NOT stupid ....regards
Posted by: claudio | February 27, 2009 at 01:07 PM
Checkout Dan Simmons' books Illium and Olympos. Specifically, Olympos (if I remember correctly) describes the evolution of the internet into a self-aware being.
Posted by: anon | February 27, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Skynet!
How would one know if this entity became "Self Aware"?
I know I'm self aware, I can only assume the rest of humans are - not prove. If the "Minds Eye" cannot/has not been identified in organic entities, how then would it be confirmed in inorganic life?
Posted by: SB | February 27, 2009 at 07:35 PM
nice share, thanks.
Posted by: Blogger Articles | February 27, 2009 at 09:05 PM
Suppose and then suppose and then suppose
That wires on the far-slung telephone black poles
Sopped up the billion-flooded words they heard
Each night all night and saved the sense
And meaning of it all.
Then, jigsaw in the night,
Put all together and
In philosophic phase
Tried words like moron child.
Thus mindless beast
All treasuring of vowels and consonants
Saves up a miracle of bad advice
And lets it filter, whisper, heartbeat out
One lisping murmur at a time.
So one night soon someone sits up
Hears sharp bell ring, lifts phone
And hears a Voice like Holy Ghost
Gone far in nebulae
That Beast upon the wire,
Which with sibilance and savorings
Down continental madnesses of time
Says Hell and O
And then Hell-O
To such Creation
Such dumb brute lost Electric Beast,
What is your wise reply?
Ray Bradbury, "Night Call, Collect"
Posted by: cbmira01 | February 28, 2009 at 12:05 AM
like Shakatany I also once read a short story on the same thing. Except it was a little more recent and it takes place as an IM conversation one person had with the interenet it's self who thinks it's the new god. it get a little funny when the person has to teach the internet what an emoticon is.
Posted by: Bennzor | February 28, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Once again, love the story, hate the hate.
Can't there be one story on here that doesn't bash spiritual or religious people? From what was said in this story, I guess Gandhi, the Dalai Lama and other such figures have "rarely have anything useful (or even sensible) to say".
Posted by: Gregor | February 28, 2009 at 08:48 PM
Like many other commenters here, I observe that the notion of a self-aware net is fairly old. Wrote an article about it myself over ten years ago. The difference is that I pointed out that intelligence arises only when the underlying substrata are forgotten, and that it is perfectly possible to create intelligence without having been aware you have done so. The phone/internet system does represent billions of exchanges. If we say it is think, what is it thinking of? Who could say? Do my brain cells understand, each one, individually, my thought in this letter?
As for all the porn and stupidity on the net--nice joke, but doesn't that raise the question of where all that so-called "junk" DNA come from? The stuff without which not the rest, but whose purpose we cannot determine?
Posted by: Jack Butler | March 01, 2009 at 09:42 AM
"Others would object that only beings with souls can ever be truly alive, but such people rarely have anything useful (or even sensible) to say on the subjects of evolution or technology and so can be safely ignored."
Haha true, interesting piece, now im going to post this and then attempt to prove that Im human not not 90% spam and 9% pornography.
Posted by: Mifkin | March 01, 2009 at 02:35 PM
>>SB WROTE:
>>How would one know if this entity became "Self Aware"?
>>I know I'm self aware, I can only assume the rest of
>>humans are - not prove. If the "Minds Eye" cannot/has
>>not been identified in organic entities, how then
>>would it be confirmed in inorganic life?
>>Posted by: SB | February 27, 2009 at 07:35 PM
Well, SB, we already know this: the entity would have to go through a series of meditations, realize God is not an EVIL genius, then THINK therefore KNOW that it is. :)
Posted by: guyuomo | March 02, 2009 at 07:45 AM
How could it evolve? Where is the selective pressure? Life evolves at least in part because of competition for scarce resources. Without selective pressure, there is no pressure to change. Even if there were, what would the mechanism be? Evolution predominately relies on random mutations, some of which provide advantages that are passed on, generation to generation. I just don't see how this analogy works. Fun to think about, though.
Posted by: Wukoki | March 02, 2009 at 05:58 PM
Wukoki,
What about shortest path algorithms, cpu cycles, and storage space for persistent data ... those require finite resources that are in high demand.
And as far as evolution is concerned, it doesn't matter how systems improve/evolve, just so long as they do for survival's sake. Think of and combine Moore's Law and pollination. We want faster computers and networks, and more storage ... computer systems evolve because we aide them. The question is: can we be made redundant?
The pressure is there.
Here is your pink slip Human Race... :)
Posted by: guyuomo | March 03, 2009 at 06:03 AM
True A. I. can't arise from a bunch of unrelated computer files that are sharing cyberspace. TA - DA !!! A self - aware, sentient program /cybernetic lifeform emerges. The stuff of science fiction..... They'd have to be manipulated & arranged by a crafty computer program or possibly a virus.
Posted by: EvilCosmicMonkeyFrom Knoxville | March 04, 2009 at 12:49 PM
1. Create international network
2. Give it a catchy name like, the "internet"
3. Have it evolve into some uncontrollable and all-knowing Google lifeform
4. ?????????
5. PROFIT!!
Sorry, had to..
Posted by: Chase | March 05, 2009 at 01:30 PM
Skynet, the " Puppet Master " from the Movie "Ghost In the Shell ", & other AI entities in other sci - fi tv shows & movies..... It ain't gonna happen like that, people.
We're going to design Cylons. They will evolve. They will have many copies. & they will have a Plan.
Of course I'm merely pulling your collective legs by referencing the opening text of BSG..... Or am I ?
Posted by: EvilCosmicMonkeyFrom Knoxville | March 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM
This idea still freaks me out, even though it's been years since the concept first went mainstream in the movies.
Posted by: Chicago Blog | September 01, 2009 at 10:55 AM
http://guvercin-forum2009.yetkinforum.com
Posted by: güvercin | November 13, 2009 at 08:51 AM