Brain-Scan Study Rewrites Economic Theory -A Galaxy Insight
“Not what we have but what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance.”
~ Epicurus (Greek philosopher, BC 341-270)
Trying to keep up with Joneses? Why is having “enough” never quite enough for those of us living in the “rat race” of urban ideals? In an interesting new study of how money motivates, brought to us by the University of Bonn, researchers discovered that humans don’t just want “more”—we want more in comparison to others. This relative sense of “more” appears to play a much larger role in motivation that previously suspected.
These findings support previous research by Andrew Oswald of England's Warwick University and David Blanchflower of Dartmouth College who found that even if our own incomes are rising, we tend to become less happy if the incomes of others are increasing more in relation to ours.
The Bonn researchers used brain scanning to show how much we as humans take others' earnings as a measure of our own success. The study found that whether or not people made big paychecks, for example, was less of a motivating factor than whether they made MORE than their coworkers. In other words, winning the arbitrary “competition” appears to be more important than the reward itself. Which may be why Donald Trump is so fond of saying that money is not a motivation for him “except as a way to keep score.”
But for the first time, we have hard evidence for this phenomenon
detailed in a series of experiments conducted by economists and brain
scientists at the University of Bonn. They tested male subjects in
pairs, asking them to perform a simple task and promising payment for
success. Using magnetic resonance tomographs, the researchers examined
the volunteers' brain activity throughout the activities. Participants
who got more money than their co-players showed much stronger
activation in the brain's "reward center" than when both players
received the same amount. Details of the study from the study were
published recently in the journal "Science".
"This result clearly contradicts traditional economic theory," explains economist Professor Dr. Armin Falk. "The theory assumes that the only important factor is the absolute size of the reward. The comparison with other people's rewards shouldn't really play any role in economic motivation."
But that’s not at all what the researchers found. They found it’s not as much what we have, as what we have in relation to others that appears to matter most. This may partially explain the unprecedented and ballooning levels of consumer debt in the “westernized” parts of the world.
This interesting phenomenon is detailed in the book "Green with Envy: Why Keeping Up with the Joneses is Keeping Us in Debt" by journalist Shira Boss. The book is full of interesting case studies of people with hollow lives revolving around “looking” full—particularly in relation to others. "How we fit in and how we measure up are such an integral part of our financial well-being," she says. "We construct a fantasy world around those who have more money, and glorify their lives."
Boss' personal journey into covetousness started with her next-door neighbors, John and Tina, in her New York City co-op, who appeared to enjoy the “perfect” life. Rumor had it that they paid cash for their posh apartment. They liked to spend time “antiquing” upstate, jetting off to exotic locales on frequent vacations, and ordering a steady stream of luxury items that piled up at their door. Boss become mildly obsessed with how wonderful her neighbor’s lives appeared to be in comparison to her own seemingly less glamorous existence.
With her husband unable to find work and eventually returning to business school, Boss’ household had to rely solely on Boss’ income as a freelance writer. As Boss experienced the anxiety of hiding their financial stress from family and friends, she become intrigued by her state of envious frustration and decided to write a book focusing on the social psychology of money—the relationship between the household and the outside world. As part of her research, Boss asked her neighbors for an interview. What she found out was more than a little surprising. The grass wasn’t quite as green as it looked across the fence. Tina was unhappy with her career, and had racked up $21,000 in credit card debt without telling her husband, for instance. Their apparent “success” was mostly due to money given to them from their families, which for them was a point of embarrassment and something they tried to conceal from friends, among other eye-opening revelations.
Boss found similar stories from working-class couples to congressmen who couldn’t really afford their lives (some sleeping on cots in their congressional offices) to baby boomers who fear they will never be able to retire.
"We convince ourselves that our problems are ours alone, and we spend so much of our time hiding our angst, which causes more stress," says Boss. "What I learned is that everybody struggles with issues around money, nobody is completely happy and comfortable—and knowing that is a huge relief. We feel less alone."
While it is nice to “feel less alone”—to know that everyone else on the planet is crazy too—wouldn’t it feel nicer to avoid fruitless comparisons in the first place? The paradox of living our lives in relation others, is that there will always be someone who has some form of “more”. We may “score” a fleeting feeling of pleasure when we compare favorably, but it’s quickly deflated when we inevitably compare unfavorably in another measure. Frittering away our lives in this futile effort to have (or at least appear to have) more than others, may well be one of the greatest indications of human irrationality ever known. At the very least, it is a pastime that robs one of the joy of living in the present, full of gratitude for the abundance we have in relation to no one.
Posted by Rebecca Sato
Related Galaxy posts:
The Consumer Paradox: Scientists Find that Low Self-Esteem and Materialism Goes Hand in Hand
The Big Brain & the Pursuit of Happiness
Related Links:
http://www.uni-bonn.de/en/News/101_2007.html
http://ideas.repec.org/p/esx/essedp/419.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/moneyhappy/7254
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/golf/theobserver/story/0,,2208963,00.html
Reference:
Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human
Ventral Striatum. K. Fliessbach, B. Weber, P. Trautner, T. Dohmen, U.
Sunde, C. E. Elger, A. Falk. Science, 23.11.2007
Comments
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf7f753ef00e54f8d928c8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brain-Scan Study Rewrites Economic Theory -A Galaxy Insight:
» Brain-Scan Study Rewrites Economic Theory | Deliggit.com from Deliggit.com | The social sites' most interesting urls
dailygalaxy.com\r\nIn an interesting new study of how money motivates, brought to us by the Universi [Read More]
» GNC-2009-02-20 #453 Recorded on Rebuilt Machine from Geek News Central Podcast
My loyal and dedicated podcast recording PC died on Tuesday and I had to revive it with some new guts. So while I get it dialed in let me know how the sound quality was tonight. I have a decent... [Read More]
» GNC-2009-02-20 #453 Recorded on Rebuilt Machine from Geek News Central
My loyal and dedicated podcast recording PC died on Tuesday and I had to revive it with some new guts. So while I get it dialed in let me know how the sound quality was tonight. I have a decent... [Read More]
« Europa 1 - Titan 0 | Main | The Daily Flash: Eco, Space, Science (20/2) »

I would argue that these findings really change nothing, in that they are simply an alternative way of stating the very same concepts of relative valuation.
"Size of reward", i.e. VALUATION, is most generally determined comparatively to others' size of reward - so in all cases of valuation, motivational stimulus would be based upon the same comparisons to others rewards.
In summary - all of the findings on motivation originate in the same supply and demand curve.
Posted by: tonyv414 | February 19, 2009 at 06:17 AM
True, but still interesting.
Posted by: Peter M | February 19, 2009 at 11:38 AM
Wow dude that is way cool!
RT
www.anonymity.eu.tc
Posted by: Bingo Jones | February 19, 2009 at 07:01 PM
What I'm curious about is the cultural significance... how broad was the sample of people they used? For example, was the entire sample drawn from Western Europeans, or did they also include folks from other regions where this might be different?
Posted by: cliff | February 19, 2009 at 07:35 PM
I attended a lecture that I call http://ploneglenn.blogspot.com/2008/12/following-heard-off-precipice.html where the speaker gave a really interesting theory about economic bubbles. One of the reasons why people don't pull out of the market in a bubble, knowing full well that it may break at any moment, is that they can't stand the thought of making less money than their peers at any given point in time. Even if it means that ultimately they lose it all.
Posted by: Glenn | February 19, 2009 at 07:47 PM
I personally cannot identify with materialism at all, I am an indivdual not a clone and raised my grown children as such...... I feel sorry for those caught up in materialism.....it really is fruitless in the end......less will always equal more in the end........ peace
Posted by: Buffalo Gal | February 19, 2009 at 08:34 PM
Wow dude that is way cool!!
Posted by: sebasta | February 20, 2009 at 07:02 AM
Interesting ...Motivations are always and ever interesting....purely virtual stuff within a brain done of Synapses and dendrides and neurons...God know of what else !!!!
ENGINES....motivations are engines.
Reasoning and speculating about motivations...is Good .
Nobody fully understands how they are 'generated' and how-when they intervene...It is NOT a disaster...they will learn....time ...they have time.
The matter is objectively difficult.
Good luck...to all the researchers.
And anyway ......Regards
Posted by: claudio | February 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM
There is nothing new in this piece of research other than verifying what has been known for decades if not centuries. Irrespective of race, environment and circumstances humans are born with three physcological drives PRO CREATION, SECURITY AND EMULATION. Smart marketers know these human traits and have evolved "consumerism" to cater for them. EMULATION ( keeping up with the Jones"s )is fundamental to this strategy.
Posted by: BillB | February 20, 2009 at 01:40 PM
How is this new information? I thought it was common knowledge; keeping up with the Jones'. And it make real world differences: If I get a $1 raise but everyone else gets a $2 raise then then inflation adjusts products cost and I am now making $1 less in actuality. This is what happened when Bill Clinton raised minimum wage; the bottom was raised, the middle and above stayed the same, but the cost of everything when up and I had less money in the bank.
Posted by: Michael | February 20, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Interesting. I wonder how that intertwines with the study showing that people prefer equality in incomes, and will work actively to level the economic playing field. There's an article on it here: http://www.reason.com/news/show/119760.html (ignoring the libertarian "well...we're still right!" trash at the end).
As to the individual above, re: Clinton and minimum wage. Nice theory, though prices had already gone up, and had been going up for years, before the minimum wage was raised to compensate. I think your correlation is mistaken.
Posted by: Raven Daegmorgan | February 20, 2009 at 10:12 PM
spy bird design method & details please sent my email address
Posted by: pandi.m | February 22, 2009 at 11:51 PM
recipice.html where the speaker gave a really interesting theory about economic bubbles. One of the reasons why people don't pull out of the market in a bubble, knowing full well that it may break at any moment, is that they can't stand the thought of maki
Posted by: Shoes Suppliers | September 29, 2010 at 08:37 PM
A very good post ,I like it very much ,hope you will give another post asap
Posted by: timberland boots black | November 09, 2010 at 11:21 PM
I would love to bookmark your blog as there are very interesting and encouraging articles!
Posted by: cheap ugg boots | November 10, 2010 at 07:29 PM
This is one of the best blogs i've read in a long time.
Posted by: uggs on sale | November 15, 2010 at 07:41 PM
Thanks for the post. I'll definitely try it http://www.linksoflondonllc.com/ on my blog.
Posted by: DarkUFO | February 24, 2011 at 05:35 PM
I like it very much ,hope you will give another post asapml p
Posted by: cheap designer shoes | April 28, 2011 at 11:48 PM
here it is! so great!
Posted by: hermes handbags | May 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM
dialed in let me know how the sound quality was tonight. I have a decent...
Posted by: cheap purses | August 12, 2011 at 10:29 PM
Cartier Necklace will company with you to spend this special day. It maybe sent as a gift to you by your lover. So romantic.
Posted by: cartier necklaces | August 12, 2011 at 10:57 PM
Hey, you say nice topic!cartier loveI very like your article, hope you will continue to update your article and topic, more exciting, go here!
Posted by: cartier love | August 25, 2011 at 05:32 AM
I am simply out of words after reading your blog. I want to appreciate the way you handled such a complicated subject.
Posted by: The Addams Family Tickets | September 14, 2011 at 02:13 AM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing
Posted by: Boker Knives | October 10, 2011 at 12:50 AM
Thank you so very much for taking the time to share…very useful, indeed!
Posted by: replica jewelry | October 12, 2011 at 02:46 AM