Did Methane from Massive Ice Sheets Cause a Shift to Global Warming 635 Million Years Ago?
Space -The Daily Flash (11/06)

Has Mars Science Laboratory Made the Discovery of the Decade?

Marsmethanegas_2 A gas plume on Mars could turn out to be the most important discovery of the decade, or nothing but a bad smell.  NASA are taking the possibility seriously and the decision on whether to retask almost two billion dollars worth of equipment to investigate will have to be made soon.

Planetary scientists at NASA's Goddard Flight Center claim to have identified hotspots of methane gas emission, extremely localized plumes whose concentration fades quickly in time. An atmosphere-wide distribution that's stable in time would indicate a balance between geological sources and destruction by sunlight. Localized sources, however, suggest much more active sources.

What's the best source of methane most people know about?  Cows.  That's unlikely on Mars.  But backing off a level, the important factor is LIFE.  NASA team leader Michael Mumma puts forward the idea that subterranean bacteria could be producing the noxious fumes, which periodically percolate to the surface in short lived bursts.  But it could also be a geological source deep below the surface. The CH4 was identified spectroscopically, analyzing the exact wavelengths of the light emitted from certain regions over time.  It's exactly the same strategy the astronomers of old used, "just looking at what color things are", but since we worked out (some) quantum mechanics the same light can tell us so much more.  Unfortunately, it can't make the crucial distinction between life or rock-based gas.

But if we can just get a bit closer we can find out.  The carbon 'C' in CH4 could be identified by the Mars Science Laboratory, almost a ton of super-science goodness.  Three times the weight (and with ten times the payload) of past rovers, the MSL can analyze the carbon.  Biochemical reactions prefer the isotope C-12 (six protons, six neutrons) while geological processes are just as happy with its isotope brother, C-13 (seven neutrons).  A quick test of the C12:C13 ratio will tell us whether we're dealing with venting rocks or extra-terrestrial life, right next door.

A lot will depend on Mumma's paper, currently under review for publication in Science.  One of the seven sites under consideration for MSL touchdown features one of the methane hotspots 'Nili Fossae'.  If he can convince NASA, the Martian Laboratory may be making one small sniff for mankind.

Methane Plumes on Mars  
Image credit: JPL-Caltech/Univ. Arizona/NASA

By Luke McKinney


Richard Hoagland-'Dark Mission'-a synopsis of 40 years of NASA lies

More wasted tax dollars!!!

NASA "are" taking the posibility seriously . . .
Should be NASA "is". This is so egregious it detracts from the article. NASA is one big collective and takes the singular form is, not are. It is not only incorrect, it sounds weird.

RE: "Has Mars Science Laboratory Made the Discovery of the Decade?"

Short answer, NO. MSL won't even be launched to Mars until NEXT YEAR -- they're still putting it together and testing it.

Unless this copy is dated to years from now ...

That's just bad and sensational journalism. Pathetic.


Thought you might also be interested in this:

How do you tell the difference between organics on Mars, and those you bring with you from Earth?


Where to begin? First, methane is not a "noxious" gas (Somebody is confusing bovine flatulence with cosmochemistry). Methane is relatively abundant elsewhere in the solar system and biology is not required to produce it. Methane is simply the hydride of carbon. Carbon is highly abundant among heavy atoms while hydrogen is the most abundant element overall. That hydrogen and carbon atoms should find each other to form methane in protosolar systems requires no stretch of the imagination. The breathless exhortation on the possibility of life based on this finding is premature and most likely has more to do with continued funding than anything else.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)