Do Dolphins Have a Sense of the Future? -A Galaxy Insight
Partly because their brains are roughly the same size as humans, and
are similarly or superiorly complex (although differently evolved in
structure), some marine biologists have speculated that dolphins, and
other Cetaceans, are at least as intelligent as humans, and could have
several unknown communicative abilities, that surpass human
understanding.
Critics say that if dolphins were as smart as us there’d be more evidence of it. But what type of evidence would suffice? The fact that Cetaceans are suffering from (rather than creating) the kind of environmental suicide that humans indulge in, offers little proof of inferiority.
At the Institute for Marine Mammal Studies in Mississippi, Kelly the Dolphin has earned her reputation. In fact, it could very well be that she has now got the upper hand on her human trainers… or pets?
All the dolphins at the center are trained to retrieve trash that has mistakenly fallen in to their pools. Upon seeing a nearby trainer, they are to take said trash to the trainer. In return, they receive a fish for their cleanliness.
However it seems that Kelly found a loophole in the system, and is exploiting it to interesting ends. She hoards her trash, underneath a rock at the bottom of her pool, and when she sees a trainer she goes down and removes a piece of paper or trash to get her fish. However she won’t use all her paper at once, instead she holds on to them for the future. It is an interesting behavior, considering that it is very much like humans storing food for the winter; it displays an awareness of tomorrow.
Dolphins have long been observed to take great care and exhibit much intelligence in their day to day lives. Scientists have observed a dolphin using the spiny body of a dead scorpion fish to extricate a moray eel out of a crevice.
Comparatively, in Australia, Dolphins have been witnessed to place sea-sponges over their snouts as they star poking around in the surrounding area. This protection helps them from being stung by stonefish and stingrays.
But it isn’t just these behaviors that seem to prove their intelligence, but also the commonalities with humans in the way that they play and learn.
Younger dolphin calves will most likely learn new things in an attempt to keep up with those around them, rather than learn directly from their mothers. From balancing kelp on their tail to swimming through bubble rings, it seems an effort to match their peers is what drives them on.
And just as young children are always trying to match those around them, so they want to enjoy the activity rather than just the outcome. It isn’t always a case of the means justifying the ends. The same goes for dolphins, who seem to beef up the level of difficulty of the games they create for themselves.
It is their ability to understand sentences of sign language that astound though, with a sentence like “touch the frisbee with your tail and then jump over it” returning just that from the dolphin. This proves more than just rigorous training is the answer, but an understanding of what we are asking of them.
The year 2007 has been declared as Year of
the Dolphin by the United Nations and United Nations Environment
Programme. But what do we really know about these incredible creatures?
In 1967, acoustics expert Wayne Batteau developed a technique based on
ultrasounds to communicate with domesticated dolphins. At the origin of
the study, the US Navy cryptically decided to classify the results as
top secret.
It is known that the prehistoric predecessors of Cetaceans were land
animals who returned to the sea where there was relatively little fear
of large predators and an abundant food supply. Dolphins seem to have
rich communicative powers among themselves and are very playful. It is
also known that dolphins can use tools and teach their children how to
use tools. Dolphins are one of the few animals other than humans known
to mate for pleasure rather than strictly for reproduction. They form
strong bonds with each other, which leads them to stay with their
injured and sick. Dolphins also display protective behavior towards
humans, by keeping them safe from sharks, for example.
Historically, humans have long reported an affinity with dolphins, including joint cooperative fisheries in ancient Rome and other interactions. A modern human-dolphin fishery still takes place in Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
However, humans are known to benefit from dolphins in more intangible ways, as well. One example of a little understood benefit comes from an ongoing study conducted at The AquaThought Foundation, a privately funded research organization dedicated to the exploration of human-dolphin interaction. Their research shows several significant trends that have emerged in the analysis of samples collected before and after human/dolphin interactions.
According to their research, the human subject's dominate brain frequency drops significantly after dolphin interaction. Also observable is a period of hemispheric synchronization (the brainwaves emitted from both the left and right hemispheres of the brain are in phase and of similar frequency). Also, in many instances the background EEG became more evenly distributed within the spectrum. It is believed that this phenomenon may have some sort of therapeutic effect on an individual’s emotional, or physical health.
Other institutes that study dolphins, and other Cetaceans, have reported a myriad of differing perspectives and beliefs, which range from heart-warming to downright bizarre.
The Hawaii based Sirius Institute, known for sending live humpback
whalesongs into deep space, says their primary goals is for the
reestablishment of interspecies communications with the biggest, most
complex brains on the planet.
One of their projects is an
interspecies birth cohort, a group of children who would be birthed
with dolphins and raised somewhat together in order to study the
development of communications between the close-knit groups.
These open-minded Cetacea advocates point out that like humans, the Cetaceans transmit information culturally across generations, have the largest brains, and are the longest lived of all species. They would like humans to officially recognize the order Cetacea as a “people”. They believe that step is necessary for their preservations, as was historically necessary to stop genocide of humans. One example is the Australian aboriginal people, who were legally classed as “game animals” until 1967 when they won their “rights as human beings” in a court action.
While Cetaceans aren’t likely to take mankind to court, it has been suggested that they are willing to communicate with us—possibly in a form that WE are too stupid to cognitively interpret.
Is it possible that someday man or dolphin will have figured out a way to effectively communicate? While the concept seems strange, and fantastic—it’s worth remembering that it wasn’t that long ago when no one thought space travel was possible. At the present, enormous amounts of money, focus and energy is poured into our search for intelligent . Maybe we should be simultaneously supporting efforts to communicate with intelligent life on our own planet.
After all, it might be good practice for the future. If we someday do make contact with intelligent alien life, how would we communicate? Surely extra-terrestrials will have evolved with a much different intellectual/physical capabilities than us. Even if a particular alien life form is as intelligent or even possesses far superior cognitive abilities—that doesn’t mean we’ll have compatible biological systems for true communication. How will we overcome those physical and intellectual communication barriers? Learning to more effectively communicate and understand differently evolved life forms on our planet may provide important insights into possible future interactions with life beyond planet Earth.
Posted by Rebecca Sato and Josh Hill.
Related Galaxy posts:
Links:
http://www.aquathought.com/
http://www.planetpuna.com/siriusa/NewDolphinization.htm
http://ninemsn.australiatests.com/mag/dolphin-1.asp?v=42
Comments
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf7f753ef00e54fbf37428834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do Dolphins Have a Sense of the Future? -A Galaxy Insight:
« Origins: How the Moon Affected Life on Earth | Main | Princeton Team Challenges Darwin: Evolution Not Random? »

Grammar check, or a basic education will take you a long way...
Posted by: Joe | November 13, 2008 at 07:56 AM
Don't be a close-minded prick.
Posted by: JoeSchmo | November 13, 2008 at 10:10 AM
I had a wonderful experience with a mated pair of Hawaiian Bottlenose dolphins...When I was on a longliner Tuna boat in the 70's (before I learned better)we would stop for lunch at the end of the flagline and one day a male dolphin stuck his nose on the gunwale edge and squawked loudly and then swam a sort distance back down the line...then back and repeated the message...we ran down the line until we found his mate, who had tried to steal our bait (Look, honey, free breakfast!) and got hooked on her lip! rather than tear her lip she sent Hubby to us for the rescue! I swear she sat her cute little nose on the gunwale and patiently waited while I removed the hook...thanked us with a flip and some clicxkin, squeeling and swam off! Amazing! This was my first falling in love with Dolphins and Whales came later.
Posted by: Papawhale | November 14, 2008 at 07:54 AM
Ahem, but "aboriginals classified as "game
animals"?
It is an eye catching thought but, it certainly sounded bogus, and a very quick check of Wikipedia
confirms the falsity of the statement that aboriginals were classified as "game
animals." From Wikipedia, heading: Australian Referendum, 1967
(Aboriginals)
It is frequently stated that the _1967_ (http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ 1967)
referendum gave Aboriginal people Australian citizenship and that it gave
them the right to vote in federal elections. Neither of these statements is
correct. Aboriginal people became Australian citizens in _1948_
(http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ 1948) , when a separate Australian citizenship was created for
the first time (before that time all Australians were "British subjects").
Aboriginal people from Queensland and Western Australia gained the vote in
Commonwealth territories in _1962_ (http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ 1962) . However,
the Commonwealth voting right of Aborigines from other states was confirmed by
a Commonwealth Act in 1949 (the constitution already gave them that right
but it was often interpreted differently prior to 1949). They got the vote in
WA state election in 1962 and Queensland state election in 1965.
While Wikipedia is not a direct source, it provides links to direct sources.
Posted by: Morf | November 14, 2008 at 08:54 AM
I do love this blog and the stories, but there were several obvious grammar mistakes and the false statements about 'game animals' might make me look elsewhere for my science news.
Posted by: B | November 14, 2008 at 09:26 PM
This might relate to this article.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44S1UxrR15U&feature=related
Posted by: SoMany?s | November 15, 2008 at 04:04 AM
The statement about the status of the aboriginal people being "game animals" came from my personally speaking with Bill Smith, an aboriginal rights leader from Sydney, Australia who I met and spoke with. My apologies for any lack of accuracy in his statements.
Posted by: Michael Hyson | November 15, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Aloha
On reflection, I would like to amend the above comment.
Bill Smith was an aboriginal rights leader. He knew a lot and was an amazing man. I happened to play yadaki with him at a corroboree at the ICERC dolphin conference in 1992 in Kona, Hawaii and we talked of these issues extensively. He is the one who used the phrase "game animals" and was directly involved in the action to gain rights for his people. I will accept his word first.
There is a difference between truth and fact.
Mahalo nui loa
Michael T. Hyson, Ph.D.
Sirius Institute
Puna, and Captain Cook Hawai'I at 19.5 N Latitude
Posted by: Michael Hyson | November 18, 2008 at 02:32 AM
For some further information on this issue:
See: http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2008/01/27/story29817.asp
Invisible in Australia
Sunday, January 27, 2008 - By Markham Nolan
Before 1967, Aboriginal people existed only under the Flora and Fauna Act. They were not counted as human beings in the census and no legislation was enacted with them in mind.
‘‘Until I was 21, I was flora and fauna,” says Carmody, whose human existence was only recorded after he reached the age of majority.
‘‘We were claimed as flora and fauna under the federal constitution. I’m not a refugee, not an immigrant, not a displaced person or an asylum-seeker,” he says, but points out he had no human legal status.
‘‘They could do what they wanted to us, shoot us like dingos. My uncle was shot dead in 1949 - a bullet went into his back. On the death cert it said ‘death by misadventure’.”
Carmody’s story is by no means isolated. No rights were ascribed to Aboriginals, who saw their children stolen by the government and placed withwhite families in an attempt to ‘breed out’ Aboriginality - a campaign that lasted, officially, until 1969, but in reality, stretched further.
Mahalo,
Michael Hyson, Ph.D.
Sirius Institute
Posted by: Michael Hyson | November 18, 2008 at 11:58 PM
I wouldn't do much research using Wikipedia to tell people how inaccurate they are.
Posted by: Jim | November 21, 2008 at 06:59 AM
There is some truth in what Papawhale is saying. There were movenments to enhance the quality of life for the indigenous of Australia prior to 1967, HOWEVER the citizenship rights of Aboriginal Australians were not officially recognised until 1967. All the other dates you have stated were the beginings of the 1967 outcome. Poor effort really.
It is well documented that Australian Aboriginals were not classed as people but came under the 'flora and fauna act'. YOu can understand why Bill Smith may have used the words "game animals".
Troy Johnson
Goreng Goreng Nation.
Posted by: Boods | September 11, 2010 at 03:46 PM