Virgin Galactic to Offer Space Cruise through Aurora Borealis
Imagine what kind of spectacular show it would be like to
fly into the heart of the Northern Lights. You may not have to imagine forever.
Richard Branson has been busy thinking up new ways to get people excited about
private space tourism, and he’s come up with something pretty spectacular. He’s
offering to fly the affluent into the world’s biggest lightshow, the Aurora
Borealis.
The New Mexico Virgin Galactic Spaceport isn't scheduled for completion until 2010, but Branson is already planning his next project from an Arctic launchpad located in the far north of Sweden in the small town of Kiruna. The Arctic location provides the town with unrivalled views of the spectacular phenomenon.
Safe, and undoubtedly an incredible view.
Posted by Rebecca Sato
Related Galaxy posts:
The Airships of the Future
Future of Space Travel —Insights from a Revolutionary Rocket Scientist
Space Odyssey 2: Plasma-based Space Travel a Reality -A Galaxy Insight
Space Colonization -Our Future or Fantasy?
"The Overview Effect": Is Space Travel Next Step in Human Evolution?
The "Hawking Solution": Will Saving Humanity Require Leaving Earth Behind?
Related links:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/dec/29/spaceexploration.northernlights
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/07/branson-wants-to-fly-space-tourists-into-the-northern-lights/
http://virtual.finland.fi/finfo/English/aurora_borealis.html



remember stephen king's "the langoliers"?
Posted by: joe | January 10, 2008 at 08:26 AM
Go-go, Virgin! I swear I'll buy a ride right after I'll earn 2nd million
=)
Posted by: PK | January 10, 2008 at 11:19 AM
How is the plane going to handle the radiation up there?
Posted by: Dave | January 10, 2008 at 02:23 PM
How is the plane going to handle the radiation up there?
Every flight comes with free sterilization!
Posted by: lorien1973 | January 10, 2008 at 05:57 PM
This is another development that will significantly change our views of humans and our position on Earth. More on this in the recent article:
"Unconventional discoveries and theories help us prepare for an uncertain future" (AmericanChronicle.com, January 6, 2008) at ...
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=48123
Posted by: Hammo | January 11, 2008 at 06:44 AM
Its all just a ploy to make billions in law suits when I sue NASA for polluting our orbit with "space junk".
Seeing as there are no laws that govern flights into space, and that space isn't technically "owned" by anyone. I could throw a shitload of rich people on one of my space craft and watch it get creamed by a piece of space junk , killing everyone aboard and then myself, along with families of the passengers could easily sue NASA for the deaths caused by their pollution which they have spent so long neglecting to rectify.
See, I'm smart - I can make money.
Posted by: Richard Branson | January 11, 2008 at 05:39 PM
the sky won't be the only thing glowing after this trip.
Posted by: william | January 12, 2008 at 06:31 PM
the sky won't be the only thing glowing after this trip.
Posted by: william | January 12, 2008 at 06:31 PM
the sky won't be the only thing glowing after this trip.
Posted by: william | January 12, 2008 at 06:31 PM
I think this is one of the few times imo when privatization is a really good idea. Whether we think it’s necessary or not, we need to continue to develop new forms of space travel and technology to facilitate it. What the ppl whose only argument is “we have too many problems down here to be worrying about this,” they fail to understand the two most important implications of aeronautical research. The first is for national defense… it’s bad enough that nasa has to rely on Russia to ferry them to the ISS. If we keep going at this rate, our disadvantage will only grow as they continue to develop new technologies in their space program while we pump the brakes on ours. Is air and space superiority something you really want the Russians to have? It doesn’t seem like a good idea for any one country to have, let alone one whom we have a sketchy history with. The second is that with aeronautical research comes a flood of new technologies, most of which are very applicable to us down on earth. For example, if it wasn’t for nasa, we wouldn’t have the chips that we use for non-invasive biopsies, solar energy, and a whole litany of other things (http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html#Top has a good number of inventions that most of us don’t know came from our space program). And if you’re one of those ppl that are so skeptical (or cynical imo) that you still don’t think that any of the things on this list warrant a larger investment in a privatized space industry, just remember that while you sleep at night, you most likely have nasa to thank for that, too. If you use any type of home security system, chances are they use infrared and laser technology that came out of nasa’s research (just look at the adt home security infrared camera page. They even admit that the technology came from nasa!)
Posted by: adt wireless security system | November 16, 2010 at 03:02 PM