Is Future Intimacy with Robots Inevitable?

"My forecast is that around 2050, the state of Massachusetts will be the first jurisdiction to legalize marriages with robots," claimed artificial intelligence researcher David Levy at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands. Levy recently completed his Ph.D. work on the subject of human-robot relationships.

He admits that sex with robots might be a little geeky, "but once you have a story like 'I had sex with a robot, and it was great!' appear someplace like Cosmo magazine, I'd expect many people to jump on the bandwagon," Levy said.

The idea of romance between humans and their creations dates back to ancient times. According to Greek myth, the sculptor Pygmalion fell in love with an ivory statue he made named Galatea. Luckily the goddess Venus eventually granted the statue life so they could be together.

In more modern times, science fiction explored this idea. But it’s been known to happen in reality as well. Forty years ago, scientists found that students were becoming unusually attracted to ELIZA, a computer program designed to ask questions and mimic a psychotherapist.

"There's a trend of robots becoming more human-like in appearance and coming more in contact with humans," Levy said. "At first robots were used impersonally, in factories where they helped build automobiles, for instance. Then they were used in offices to deliver mail, or to show visitors around museums, or in homes as vacuum cleaners, such as with the Roomba. Now you have robot toys, like Sony's Aibo robot dog, or Tickle Me Elmos, or digital pets like Tamagotchis."

In his thesis, "Intimate Relationships with Artificial Partners," Levy conjectures that robots will become so human-like in appearance, function and personality that many people will fall in love with them, have sex with them and even marry them.

"It may sound a little weird, but it isn't," Levy said. "Love and sex with robots are inevitable."

Levy argues that psychologists have identified roughly a dozen basic reasons why people fall in love, "and almost all of them could apply to human-robot relationships. For instance, one thing that prompts people to fall in love are similarities in personality and knowledge, and all of this is programmable. Another reason people are more likely to fall in love is if they know the other person likes them, and that's programmable too."

As software becomes more advanced and the relationship between humans and robots becomes more personal, marriage could result. "One hundred years ago, interracial marriage and same-sex marriages were illegal in the United States. Interracial marriage has been legal now for 50 years, and same-sex marriage is legal in some parts of the states," Levy said. "There has been this trend in marriage where each partner gets to make their own choice of who they want to be with."

"The question is not if this will happen, but when," Levy said. "I am convinced the answer is much earlier than you think."

Levy thinks Massachusetts will be the first jurisdiction to legalize human-robot marriage. "Massachusetts is more liberal than most other jurisdictions in the United States and has been at the forefront of same-sex marriage," Levy said. "There's also a lot of high-tech research there at places like MIT."

Since robots aren’t capable of feeling, wouldn’t a marriage to one be pretty empty and one-sided? Cynthia Breazeal, associate professor at M.I.T. and director of the Personal Robotics Group. Breazeal says trying to figure out whether the “social” robots she has helped developed are capable of “feeling”, is a very complicated subject.

“Robots are not human, but humans aren’t the only things that have emotions,” she said. “The question for robots is not, Will they ever have human emotions? Dogs don’t have human emotions, either, but we all agree they have genuine emotions. The question is, what are the emotions that are genuine for the robot?”

Although roboticist Ronald Arkin at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta does not think human-robot marriages will be legal anywhere by 2050, "anything's possible. And just because it's not legal doesn't mean people won't try it."

But who would want to marry a robot instead of a real person? Levy says it would give extremely shy, geeky, ugly or disturbed individuals a chance to be with “someone”.

"People who find it hard to form relationships, because they are extremely shy, or have psychological problems, or are just plain ugly or have unpleasant personalities," Levy said. "Of course, such people who completely give up the idea of forming relationships with other people are going to be few and far between, but they will be out there."

Perhaps keeping a robot for sex could reduce human prostitution and the problems that come with it. But "in a marriage or other relationship, one partner could be jealous or consider it infidelity if the other used a robot," Levy said.

"But who knows, maybe some other relationships could welcome a robot. Instead of a woman saying, 'Darling, not tonight, I have a headache,' you could get 'Darling, I have a headache, why not use your robot?"

treat them are something we'll have to consider very seriously, and they're very complicated issues," Levy said.

Posted by Rebecca Sato

Related posts:

“What is Life?” A New Breed of Robots Are Causing Scientists to Question
Robot Evolution: A Parallel to the Origins of Life
Android 'Repliee Q1Expo' -No More Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos?
Robot Love! -Study Finds Humans Get Attached to Their Robot Helpers

Link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21271545/wid/11915829?GT1=10450

Comments

[Jason Argopoulos]

What I want to know is the expected date for the first human-robot divorce.

[Daniel Appleton]

This kind of scenario is the dream of every science - fiction fanatic / tech expert / " geek " who is awkward, shy, wary of social interaction with members of the opposite sex ( To quote the Mayor of Springfield addressing a Science Fiction convention - " All you dateless wonders ! ) & possibly the dream of every man who wants a cheerful, syrupy - sweet, compatible, compliant woman, subservient to his every whim.

Feminists see it - IMO - as still more sexual exploitation by proxy.

In any event, with a robot companion, male OR female, one might have an ideal mate, but wouldn't one be constantly reminded that " he / she " was artificial when their companion began repeating phrases from their databases or talking about updates or maintenance ? I presume that a repeated phrase or reminders of updates or maintenance might be thought of as similiar to being mindful of a fiance's or mates epilepsy or diabetes, & with the advent of a little innovation called " fuzzy logic " that might be considered moot.

& also, wouldn't purchasing such a being be almost prohibitively expensive ? A " fembot " might be a rich man's personal plaything, or a wealthy divorcee or widow might be able to purchase the services of a male robot for a week in Acapulco or Honolulu, but not so for the majority of people.
Unless there were specially assigned human like " treatment " or " companion " robots similar to helper dogs for disabled people today.

[skeptic from hell]

Nice... A robot programmed to crave anal sex...

[Daniel Appleton]

Such a romantic scenario isn't totally unrealistic. In Star Trek : The Next Generation & ST : Voyager, the crew went to the Holdeck all the time & created holographic beings who were not altogether dissimilar to robots & androids, & sometimes wound up developing romantic feelings for them & temporary relationships as well.

There are web - sites where one can download, purchase & register a " Virtual Girl ", that has all the attributes of a desirable, beautiful young woman. The being ( ? ) can learn from you simply by conversing with it via keyboard. ( No voice input capabilities for the user yet )

There are websites geared towards people who write fiction about everything from tender, syrupy - sweet love affairs to hot sex to sadomasochistic encounters between humans & robots, androids & other man - made electronic creations.
( ahem.... )& just watch an episode or 2 of the new Battlestar Galactica. Never mind that a Cylon seductress was really a spy in the 1st season. Subtract the initial element of treachery via Tricia Helfer as
" Six ", & you have a bookish geek involved in a love affair with a fancy humanoid robot.

[julian pordoin]

My work for graduation last year talks about intimacy with robots. Give it a look:
journalism.bournemouth.ac.uk/jistilart