Harnessing the Stars: EU to Attempt Laser-based Fusion

September 04, 2007

Harnessing the Stars: EU to Attempt Laser-based Fusion

Scientists have conceived of a number of approaches to harness fusion—the same source of energy that heats the stars—as a future nonpolluting energy source. The hope is to tap into the same “star power” that exists throughout the universe.

The Sun itself is a natural fusion reactor, but scientists believe that laser technology may now be powerful enough to create safe, clean, and convenient fusion energy. Such advancement could potentially end the world's energy crisis.

“Fusion is basically nature’s solution to the energy problem,” said researcher Mike Dunne. “It’s how the Sun and the stars work. We’re just a couple of years away from seeing it in the lab. The public will then be asking what’s next, and we’ll be in a position to take it forward. It is still a way off – this is not going to solve the immediate problem of greenhouse gases. But it should make sure we never again fall into the trap of polluting to meet our energy needs.”

European scientists now have the green light to build on U.S. military scientist’s research to try to create laser-based nuclear fusion aimed at replacing fossil fuels. A team of British-led scientists has received approval from the European Union for the project, which would produce almost no greenhouse gases or long-lived radioactive waste.

While the U.S. military scientists has already developed the basic technology needed, so far the energy required to reach the temperatures at which such reactions occur, has outweighed the energy produced. However, more advanced laser technologies are expected to change that equation.

The project will use the world's most powerful laser to generate temperatures of millions of degrees. The British-led team will use lasers to ignite fusion reactions that generate more energy than they consume. After winning the backing of an influential EU science panel, the project will receive a seven-year, £500 million budget to construct an experimental reactor based on a revolutionary technique that is expected to make fusion a commercial reality by mid-century.

The prototype for the Hiper (high energy laser fusion research) project is likely to be built in Britain, using the world’s most powerful laser to generate temperatures of millions of degrees at which fusion can occur. The civilian facility will build on the US military successes, and is expected within the next five years to achieve a form of laser fusion to produce more energy than it consumes—the first benchmark towards commercial viability. Hiper will then develop a slightly different laser technique that is more suitable for wide-scale commercial use.

If it works, laser fusion power stations could be supplying most of the world’s energy needs by the middle of the century, replacing fossil fuels and nuclear fission with a technology that produces next to no greenhouse gases or long-lived radioactive waste.

The Hiper approach has been endorsed by peer-reviewers for the European Commission. But the EU is hedging the bet, by also backing an alternative approach. A reactor to be built in France by 2016 will not use lasers, but conventional “hot fusion” contained by superconducting magnets.

Nuclear fusion involves merging two types of hydrogen atom – deuterium and tritium – to make helium, as well as neutrons that release vast quantities of energy. Almost limitless amounts of deuterium fuel can be made cheaply from seawater, tritium being produced as a byproduct in the reactor itself.

The extremely high temperature at which the reaction takes place requires magnetic containment facilities, as terrestrial materials would instantly melt in contact with the reaction. However, lasers can be used to create these temperatures specifically at the point of fusion, so that containment of the reaction becomes less of a problem.

For example, a pulsed laser with a power of a petawatt (a million billion watts) is directed at a fuel pellet two millimeters across. The vast pressure this creates compresses the pellet to a diameter of few microns and generates temperatures of tens of millions of degrees, allowing fusion to begin.

Professor Dunne, of the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire, explained, “To put that in perspective, it [the laser] is 10,000 times the power of the entire UK National Grid. And then you’re going to focus that down onto a spot that’s 10 to 100 times smaller than the width of a human hair. The pressure is equivalent to 10 Nimitz class aircraft carriers sitting on your thumb. Some pretty crazy things are going to happen, and that’s what we’re about.”

Posted by Rebecca Sato

Comments

Here is a better bet:

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/mr-fusion.html
Bussard Fusion Reactor

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2006/11/easy-low-cost-no-radiation-fusion.html
Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion

It has been funded:

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/08/bussard-reactor-funded.html
Bussard Reactor Funded

I have inside info that is very reliable and multiply confirmed that validates the above story. I am not at liberty to say more. Expect a public announcement from the Navy in the coming weeks.

The above reactor can burn Deuterium which is very abundant and produces lots of neutrons or it can burn a mixture of Hydrogen and Boron 11 which does not

The implication of it is that we will know in 6 to 9 months if the small reactors of that design are feasible.

If they are we could have fusion plants generating electricity in 10 years or less depending on how much we want to spend to compress the time frame.

BTW Bussard is not the only thing going on in IEC. There are a few government programs at the University of Wisconsin and at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana among others.

Posted by: M. Simon | September 04, 2007 at 12:31 PM

I thought your readers would be interested in looking at these energy technologies and EPS's theoretic base for ball lighting.

Aneutronic Fusion: Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems

Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion

He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts

Here are the links:

http://www.electronpowersystems.com/

U.S., Chilean Labs to Collaborate on Testing Scientific Feasibility of Focus Fusion http://pesn.com/2006/03/18/9600250_LPP_Chilean_Nuclear_Commission/

However, short of a Energy "silver bullet" like fusion , Here is a fully DOABLE technology

Time to Master the Carbon Cycle with Terra Preta Soil Technology;

The integrated energy strategy offered by Charcoal based Terra Preta Soil technology may
provide the only path to sustain our agricultural and fossil fueled power
structure without climate degradation, other than nuclear power.

The economics look good, and truly great if we had CO2 cap & trade in place:

Terra Preta soils I feel has great possibilities to revolutionize sustainable agriculture into a major CO2 sequestration strategy.

I thought the current news and links on Terra Preta soils and closed-loop pyrolysis would interest you.

SCIAM Article May 15 07

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=5670236C-E7F2-99DF-3E2163B9FB144E40

After many years of reviewing solutions to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) I believe this technology can manage Carbon for the greatest collective benefit at the lowest economic price, on vast scales. It just needs to be seen by ethical globally minded companies.

Even with all the big corporations coming to the GHG negotiation table, like Exxon, Alcoa, .etc, we still need to keep watch as they try to influence how carbon management is legislated in the USA. Carbon must have a fair price, that fair price and the changes in the view of how the soil carbon cycle now can be used as a massive sink verses it now being viewed as a wash, will be of particular value to farmers and a global cool breath of fresh air for us all.

If you have any other questions please feel free to call me or visit the TP web site I've been drafted to co-administer. http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=node

It has been immensely gratifying to see all the major players join the mail list , Cornell folks, T. Beer of Kings Ford Charcoal (Clorox), Novozyne the M-Roots guys(fungus), chemical engineers, Dr. Danny Day of EPRIDA , Dr. Antal of U. of H., Virginia Tech folks and probably many others who's back round I don't know have joined.

Also Here is the Latest BIG Terra Preta Soil news;

ConocoPhillips Establishes $22.5 Million Pyrolysis Program at Iowa State 04/10/07

Mechabolic , a pyrolysis machine built in the form of a giant worm to eat solid waste and product char & fuel at the "Burning Man" festival ; http://whatiamupto.com/mechabolic/index.html

Erich J. Knight
540-289-9750
shengar at aol.com