"Star Trek" Warp Speeds a Reality? Scientists Claim Quantum Tunneling Exceeds Speed of Light
Follow the Daily Galaxy
Add Daily Galaxy to igoogle page AddThis Feed Button Join The Daily Galaxy Group on Facebook Follow The Daily Galaxy Group on twitter
 

« iPod Time? | Main | Celestron & The Daily Galaxy's Hand-picked Advertising Policy »

August 17, 2007

"Star Trek" Warp Speeds a Reality? Scientists Claim Quantum Tunneling Exceeds Speed of Light

Star_trek_warp_speed_2 A pair of German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light. Such an achievement would challenge our entire understanding of space and time.

Speed_of_light_street_sign_2 According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second, and that nothing—under any circumstances—can exceed the speed of light.

However, Dr Gunter Nimtz and Dr Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz, say they may have breached that key tenet of the Special Relativity theory by causing light to defy it’s own speed limit.

The scientists were investigating a phenomenon called quantum tunneling, which allows sub-atomic particles to break apparently unbreakable laws, when the physicists claim they propelled photons faster than the speed of light.

Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."

Other scientists—while not doubting the pair’s results—argue that it would be naive to assume the phenomenon automatically violates special relativity, depending on how one chooses to interpret the data.

In either case, the faster than light phenomenon has raised a lot of mind-bending questions about the nature of the universe. In theory such an occurrence on a wider scale could allow for all kinds of strange events, including time travel and instantaneous traveling between distant locations.

To see how far they could make photons tunnel, Nimtz and Stahlhofen coupled two glass prisms together to make a cube 40 centimeters on its sides. Since photons tunnel most readily over distances comparable with their wavelength, the physicists used microwaves with a wavelength of 33 cm - long enough for large tunneling distances yet still short enough that the prism can bend the photons’ paths.

As expected, the microwaves shone straight through the cube, and when the prisms were separated, the first prism reflected the microwaves. However, in accordance with theory, a few microwave photons also tunneled across the gap separating the two prisms, continuing as if the prisms were still sandwiched together.

Nimtz and Stahlhofen found that the reflected microwaves and the few microwaves that tunneled through to the second prism both arrived at their respective photodetectors at the same time. This suggests an ultra-fast transit between the two prisms. In fact, it was so much faster than the speed of light that the experimenters couldn't measure it.

The pair also found that the tunneling time, if there was any, did not change as they pulled the prisms further apart. But because tunneling efficiency drops off with distance, Nimtz says that they were not able to observe the effect across distances greater a meter.

According to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, a particle's energy and the time it spends in any one place cannot both be known with absolute precision. This means particles can sometimes slip over a barrier if the time they spend traversing that barrier is short enough. According to the physicists, quantum tunneling is a fairly common phenomenon in the quantum world, and is part of many of the processes we take for granted.

"In my opinion, tunneling is the most important physical process, because we have it in radioactivity and we have it in nuclear fusion," Nimtz says. "The temperature of the sun is not high enough to organize regular fusion of protons into helium [without tunneling]. Some people are saying that the big bang happened because of tunneling. Recently, many people have argued that processes in biology and in our brain are based on tunneling."

The physicists hope that future research will reveal useful applications of these findings. If so, humankind may be in for more mind-blowing revelations about the way things work.

Or maybe tinkering with these weird principles will just blow up the universe instead: "Hey, what happens if we..." *blip*

Posted by Rebecca Sato

Related Galaxy posts:

Beyond Weird Science: General Relativity Expert Believes Humans Could Master Time Travel This Century

Weird Science: Can Time Move Backwards?

Weird Science 2 “The Journey Begins”: Cramer Goes Forward with His Time-Reversal Experiment

“Star Trek” Teleportation: Physicists Develop a Way to “Beam Up” Atoms

Cool Star Trek Warp Drive Wrath of Khan Video Clip

 

Story Link

Recommended links:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts

http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0681

news.sawf.org,

timworstall.typepad.com,

www.breitbart.com,

www.lightparty.com,

www.science-spirit.org,

www.omniology.com

Comments

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070816-faster-than-the-speed-of-light-no-i-dont-think-so.html

Sorry buddy.

Tunneling is essentially instantaneous, because it corresponds to the observed particle falling into an eigenstate. But it's wrong to think of the observed particle as "travelling" across the potential gap in the everyday sense of the word.

Read the chapter on Fuzzy Tigers in Mr Tompkins In Paperback if you want to understand this. The analogy to tunnelling would be if the dead tiger appeared over the fence in the neighbour's garden.

Bug 56, the fact is that these particles do somehow get from A to B faster than normal light can travel--something Einstein said couldn't happen.

Whether the "pathway" is instantaneous or not--it transfers there somehow, in some little understood form of "travel" (although not in the normal sense of travel as Ian mentions).

The article you referenced is full of inaccuracies and falsely implies that the physicists work isn't well documented, when in fact their experiments in tunneling have been extremely well-documented over the last several years.

The meaning of the results is being interpreted in different ways (as mentioned in this article) but the results themselves are not in question.

Sorry buddy.

While the results reported in these researchers may be correct, I get a bit nervous when fuzzy numbers are quoted in an experimental report. viz.
"The experimental result is that the reflected and the transmitted (tunneled) signal are received by the detectors at the same time. The measured time delay in both reflection and transmission of the digital pulse is about 100 ps. In this case of FTIR, this measured time delay corresponds to the Goos-Hänchen shift along the barrier boundary, i.e. along the prism-air boundary. The result is in agreement with the universal tunneling time cited above."
Just exactly what is meant by "about 100 ps". Do they mean 100 ps +/- 10 ps?... 100 ps +/- 100 ps?

While the results reported in these researchers may be correct, I get a bit nervous when fuzzy numbers are quoted in an experimental report. viz.
"The experimental result is that the reflected and the transmitted (tunneled) signal are received by the detectors at the same time. The measured time delay in both reflection and transmission of the digital pulse is about 100 ps. In this case of FTIR, this measured time delay corresponds to the Goos-Hänchen shift along the barrier boundary, i.e. along the prism-air boundary. The result is in agreement with the universal tunneling time cited above."
Just exactly what is meant by "about 100 ps". Do they mean 100 ps +/- 10 ps?... 100 ps +/- 100 ps?

While the results reported in these researchers may be correct, I get a bit nervous when fuzzy numbers are quoted in an experimental report. viz.
"The experimental result is that the reflected and the transmitted (tunneled) signal are received by the detectors at the same time. The measured time delay in both reflection and transmission of the digital pulse is about 100 ps. In this case of FTIR, this measured time delay corresponds to the Goos-Hänchen shift along the barrier boundary, i.e. along the prism-air boundary. The result is in agreement with the universal tunneling time cited above."
Just exactly what is meant by "about 100 ps". Do they mean 100 ps +/- 10 ps?... 100 ps +/- 100 ps?

what did they do to make this goal we have no proof they even built something


Post a comment

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf7f753ef00e54ee064b78834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Star Trek" Warp Speeds a Reality? Scientists Claim Quantum Tunneling Exceeds Speed of Light :

« iPod Time? | Main | Celestron & The Daily Galaxy's Hand-picked Advertising Policy »




1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8





9


11


12


13


14


15

Our Partners

technology partners

A


19


B

About Us/Privacy Policy

For more information on The Daily Galaxy and to contact us please visit this page.



E