Do We Need Real-World "Star Trek" Tricorders?
YouTube vs. Viacom: Colbert & Stewart Jump into the Ring

Could Our Lives Be a Cosmic Computer Simulation?

Multiverse_4 According to Nick Bostrom, a philosopher and director of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford, it is very possible, €”perhaps even likely that our universe is somebody else'€™s advanced computer simulation. He believes the omnipotent creator of the heavens could very well be a futuristic computer geek.

Actually, if you start stringing together some of Dr. Bostrom'€™s fairly reasonable assumptions, it starts to make sense.

Computer experts have projected, based on trends in processing power, that we will have a computer with more processing power than all the brains in the world within half a century. Dr. Bostrom theorizes that we could actually already be in such an advanced computer. In fact we could be some futurist geek'€™s game.

"Maybe they wouldn't need to do simulations for scientific reasons because they'd have better methodologies for understanding their past. It's quite possible they would have moral prohibitions against simulating people, although the fact that something is immoral doesn'€™t mean it won'€™t happen,"€ Bostrom has said.

Dr. Bostrom doesn'€™t pretend to know for certain if this is the case, but says, "€œMy gut feeling, and it'€™s nothing more than that, is that there'€™s a 20 percent chance we'€™re living in a computer simulation."

Theoretically, it is very possible that advanced civilizations could produce supercomputers, since we'€™re close to doing so ourselves. If the operators of the computers were anything like the millions of people immersed in virtual worlds like Second Life, SimCity and World of Warcraft, they'd enjoy running simulations just to get a chance to control history -€” or maybe give themselves virtual roles as Cleopatra or Napoleon.

In some ways that position disposes of that classic theological question: How could God allow bad things to happen? For the same reason there are plagues and earthquakes and battles in games like World of Warcraft. Peace isn'€™t that interesting.

So what if Bostrom is right and we could be part of an advanced computer simulation? The first impulse might be to say nothing matters anymore because nothing'€™s real. But ' reality'€ is somewhat subjective. Whether our minds are embedded in circuitry or made of carbon, it doesn'€™t necessarily make us any less "real"€. It is even possible that our designers have provided a simulated 'after-life'€.

David J. Chalmers, a philosopher at the Australian National University, says Dr. Bostrom's simulation hypothesis isn'€™t a cause for skepticism, but simply a different metaphysical explanation of our world. Whatever you€'re touching or viewing now is a sheet of paper, a keyboard, a coffee mug is real to you even if it€'s created on a computer circuit rather than fashioned out of wood, plastic or clay.

But here'€™s where the idea gets really trippy: €”our designer might be another virtual being living inside the computer of a still more advanced form of intelligence. There could be layer upon layer of simulations. In a sense, the multi-universe theory of physics would be true, with just a little twist: €”we are both the future creators and the offspring of these multiple realities where anything is possible.

Posted by Rebecca Sato

Related Posts:

Virtual Immortality -How To Live Forever

The "Blue Brain" & Human Consciousness -Scientists Create Artificial Brain

Are Our Brains Hard-wired to Follow the “Golden Rule”?

Robot Evolution: A Parallel to the Origins of Life

"Mind Children": Transhumanism & the Search For Genetic Perfection

Institute for Ethics & Emerging Technologies

Story link


If it is, does it matter?

How he managed to come up with a figure at all, never mind 20%, would be more interesting to see than a rehash of a Matrix theory.

Here you go David

the link will take you to a more detailed rationale of how Bostrom arrived at his theory...or maybe it will lead back to the prime designer.

ATTENTION! Don't watch the "13 floor" movie when drunk or over midnight! (like article author) :-D

It is nice that Dr. Bostrom doesn't claim to know for sure whether his metaphor is accurate. How modest of him.

Once again: This sort of "theory" is little more than metaphor. Worse yet, the metaphor runs backwards. We have invented computers, so now we suppose that the entire universe, in which we are tiny co-players, is like our own invention?

Does anyone else see the hubris and fallacy in such a notion?

Hi Jack! I'm not saying I agree with Bostrom. The interesting part is that there are smart educated people--not just Hollywood sci-fi writers--who think we really could be living in a virtual reality. It's just a trippy little notion to consider, but not anything to get upset about. My post was meant to be fun/interesting more than scholarly. The scholarly aspect is too long and intricate to make into a Daily Galaxy sized post, but if you do want to read Bostrom's whole scientific reasoning behind his ideas then click the link I sent to David. It's pretty convoluted, but there is a logic to it. xx


OK... Thanks for the link Rebecca... but HOLY CRAP. Pretty heady stuff, and like you say, not something which lends itself well to quick discussions in posts like these. I can't say I agree with even 1/2 of (what I think) he postulates... but my! Doesn't his flights of fancy brush horizons on a grand scale! Fun stuff!

Dave (My Mom called me David)

Oh... and the "prime designer" dig? I thought you liked me.


Dave, of course I like you! You're pretty much an honorary DG consultant--that's why I was so sad when you, Jack and Vit all ripped me a new one. :-(

You know I love to cover weird fringe theories and phenomenon. BUT, I'll try to stick to solid science for a few days--just for you! However, my gut feeling tells me I'm only about 20% likely to succeed at that goal. Ha ha!

I don't do "LOL"s much but ok... you made me smile. I wasn't trying to rip you a new one. I love the fringe too. Keep up the awesome work and thanks for the flattery.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)